Abstract
Category:
Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot
Introduction/Purpose:
Medial longitudinal arch collapse is one of the key clinical and radiographic features of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) and can occur anywhere within its three constituents: first tarsometatarsal (TMT1), naviculo- cuneiform (NC), and talonavicular (TN) joints. Medial column osteotomy or fusion has typically been utilized to address this instability. A new procedure involving transferring the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon to the 1st metatarsal base has shown promising results in restoring radiographic alignment of the entire medial column in conjunction with a hindfoot procedure.
However, the mechanism of correction in a dynamic environment is unclear. Thus, this study examined the effect of medial column stabilization using FHL transfer on the foot and ankle kinematics during stance phase.
Methods:
Twelve mid-tibia cadaveric specimen (6 male; Age 48 ± 16 years) underwent stance phase simulations using a validated six-degree of freedom robotic gait simulator. Three conditions were tested each cadaveric specimen: pre-deformity (Intact), after creating a simulated progressive collapsing foot deformity (sPCFD), and after an FHL transfer (FHL). Motion capture cameras tracked the motion of retroreflective markers inserted into bones of the foot and ankle. The FHL transfer was performed on each specimen by harvesting the FHL tendon at its distal insertion and fixing it in the 1st metatarsal with a biotenodesis screw (Figure 1A). Outcome measures include joint rotations of the TMT1, NC, TN, subtalar, and ankle joint. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in joint kinematics were statistically analyzed by constructing 95% confidence intervals of the repeated measures difference between both the sPCFD and FHL conditions and the intact condition.
Results:
The FHL condition demonstrated significant differences in the kinematics of the medial column compared to the sPCFD condition (Figure 1B). The TMT1 joint showed increased plantarflexion in early and late stance, as well as increased eversion during early and mid-stance. The NC joint demonstrated increased plantarflexion, eversion, and abduction during early stance. At the TN joint, there was increased inversion during early and late stance, as well as increased adduction during mid-stance. At the subtalar joint, subtalar eversion was decreased during early stance, and no significant differences were observed from the intact condition throughout stance. No differences were found in the ankle joint kinematics across all conditions.
Conclusion:
The results of our study demonstrate that the medial column stabilization procedure with FHL transfer can improve the kinematics of the medial column in sPCFD. Additionally, the correction at the TN and subtalar joint demonstrates the potential efficacy of this procedure for hindfoot correction. The correction occurred during the earlier stance phase as well when the FHL is not active, suggesting that this procedure provides correction in both a dynamic and static manner. This procedure can be used in conjunction with hindfoot corrective procedures in PCFD, particularly when preoperative imaging suggests multiple levels of instability within the medial column.
