Abstract
Category:
Bunion
Introduction/Purpose:
The original fixation for minimally invasive Chevron-Akin ( MICA) was described with two screws: a proximal screw reaching two cortices before fixing the metatarsal head and a distal parallel screw that can reach only one cortical before fixing the head. Despite this, some authors questioned the need for two screws and were able to reproduce good results from this technique using only one screw to fix the osteotomy. Notably, no biomechanical studies evaluate this osteotomy's most stable and safe fixation. This work aims to perform a biomechanical analysis based on finite element analysis (FEM) to compare different MICA fixation configurations using screws. Our hypothesis is that the fixation of the original technique with two screws is the safest.
Methods:
A Three-dimensional (3D) virtual model of a foot computer tomography (CT) image was made using the Rhinoceros™ program. The element finite analysis was performed with the SimLab™ program using the Optistruct solver. From these 3D virtual models, an extracapsular chevron osteotomy with 130 degrees with 70% of lateral translation was done and fixated. Five internal fixation configurations with screws were used for fixation of MICA and assessed by FEM -: original MICA fixation with 2 screws, 2 intramedullary screws, 2 bicortical screws, 01 intramedullary screw, and 01 bicortical screw. The simulated 150 N and 300 N loads were applied to the middle foot. The FEM evaluated the total and localized displacements of the osteotomy site. For the analysis of stresses, the variables maximum principal (traction) and minimum principal (compression) were used. The equivalent von Mises stress (VMS -S) was used for the metallic implants and for the bone (VMS -O).
Results:
The classical fixation for MICA showed the lowest values for total and localized displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and VMS-S and VMS-o in both conditions( 150 and 300 N). The localized displacement was statistically lower for MICA screws compared to the other fixation configurations (p < 0.05) The maximum total stress was statistically lower for MICA screws compared to the other fixation configurations (p < 0.05)
Conclusion:
The classical fixation for MICA yields better results in terms of total and localized displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and VMS in both conditions. These results demonstrate that the classical fixation for MICA described in the original technique is biomechanically the most efficient and safe.
