Abstract
Category:
Sports; Trauma
Introduction/Purpose:
Syndesmotic ankle injuries are present in one-fourth of all ankle trauma and may lead to syndesmotic instability or posttraumatic ankle osteoarthirtis on the long term. At present, they continue to impose a diagnostic dilemma our clinical practice. While magnetic resonance imaging lacks application of load to the ankle joint, plain weightbearing radiographs are skewed by superposition of the osseous structures. The recent advent of weightbearing cone-beam CT (WBCT) overcomes these drawbacks by imaging both ankles during bipedal stance. However, it remains debated whether syndesmotic ankle injuries should be imaged under weightbearing conditions and/or during application of external rotation. Therefore, we aimed to implement both weightbearing and external rotation in the assessment of syndesmotic ankle injuries using WBCT imaging combined with 3D measurement techniques.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, patients with an acute syndesmotic ankle injury were analyzed using a WBCT (N= 21; Age= 31.64±14.07 years old). Inclusion criteria were an MRI confirmed syndesmotic ligament injury imaged by a WBCT of the ankle during weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. Exclusion criteria consisted of fracture associated syndesmotic injuries. For the external rotation protocol, the patient was asked to internally rotate the shin while ensuring that the foot remained firmly plantigrade until pain (Visual Analogue Scale > 8/10) or a maximal range of motion was reached. 3D models were generated from the CT slices. Tibiofibular displacement and Talar Rotation were quantified by automated 3D measurements using a custom-made Matlab® script; Anterior Tibiofibular distance (ATFD), Alpha angle, posterior Tibiofibular distance (PTFD) and Talar rotation (TR) angle in comparison to the contralateral non-injured ankle.
Results:
The difference in neutral-stressed Alpha angle and ATFD showed a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and contralateral control (P = 0.046 and P = 0.039, respectively). The difference in neutral-stressed PTFD and TR angle did not show a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and healthy ankles (P = 0.492; P = 0.152, respectively).
Conclusion:
Application of combined weightbearing-external rotation reveals an increased ATFD in patients with syndesmotic ligament injuries (Figure 1). This study provides the first insights based on 3D measurements to support the potential relevance of applying external rotation during WBCT imaging. In clinical practice, this could enhance the current diagnostic accuracy of subtle syndesmotic instability in a non-invasive manner. However, future studies are required to determine cut-off values that may indicate the amount of displacement that might lead to chronic instability and require a certain type of treatment strategy.
