Diabetic Kidney Disease Is Associated With Increased Complications Following Operative Management of Ankle Fractures

Abstract

Background:

Diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy are established risk factors for complications in operatively treated ankle fractures. Generally, the presence of peripheral neuropathy and diabetic nephropathy have been used as independent variables in studies of diabetic ankle fracture cohorts but are typically treated as binary risk factors. Our purpose was to quantify the effects of risk factors on complication rate specific to diabetic patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation.

Methods:

We identified 617 rotational ankle fractures treated operatively at a single academic medical center from 2010 to 2019, of which 160 were identified as diabetic. Of these, 91 ankle fractures in 90 diabetic patients met criteria for retrospective review of clinical and radiographic data. Criteria included perioperative laboratory studies, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as follow-up radiographs in the electronic record. We defined complications in this surgical cohort as deep surgical site infection, unplanned return to the operating room, and failure of fixation. Logistic regression was performed and odds ratios (ORs) calculated.

Results:

The overall complication rate was 28.6% (26/91) in this cohort. Median follow-up was 29 weeks (range: 5-520 weeks). Mean perioperative HbA_1c in patients who experienced postoperative complications was 7.6% (range: 5.1%-14.2%) compared with 7.8% (range: 5.6%-13.5%) who did not (P = .69). Diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min per body surface area) (OR 5.29, P = .006) and peripheral neuropathy (OR 4.61, P = .003) were at significantly higher risk of all complications compared with diabetic patients without these comorbidities. Of note, we did not find an association between perioperative HbA_1c or body mass index and complication rate.

Conclusion:

Patients with diabetes complicated by chronic kidney disease are at significantly higher risk of complications following operative management of ankle fractures. Our study also corroborated previous reports that within this high-risk cohort, the presence of peripheral neuropathy is a significant risk factor for complications. These sequalae of diabetic disease are manifestations of microvascular disease, glycosylation of soft tissues, and impaired metabolic pathways. Identifying these risk factors in diabetic patients allows for patient-specific risk stratification, education, and management decisions of ankle fractures.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Keywords

ankle fracture diabetes chronic kidney disease peripheral neuropathy postoperative complications failure of fixation surgical site infection

Introduction

Ankle fractures represent 9% of all fractures and are widely known to have an increased risk of complications in diabetic patients.^{9,12,13,19,20,25,26,28,32,34,46,47} An estimated 34.5 million people (10.5%) in the United States are diabetic, a number that is expected to rise to 44.1 million over the next decade.^8,27 Common sequalae of poorly controlled diabetes, most notably peripheral neuropathy, lead to increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI), malunion, nonunion, in-hospital mortality, and amputation.^{19,20,26,28,32,34,46,47} Given the tandem rise of ankle fractures^4,6,14,29 and diabetes mellitus in the United States, we seek to identify factors that may increase complications in diabetic patients.

Broadly, complications from diabetes mellitus are due to microvascular and macrovascular disease secondary to uncontrolled hyperglycemia.⁴⁵ Peripheral microvascular disease can exist in the absence of macrovascular ischemia, increasing the risk of infection, poor healing, and need for further surgery.^11,45 Diabetic neuropathy alters protective sensation and gait biomechanics and contributes to ground-level falls and trauma.⁴⁵ Diabetes has been associated with altered reduced osteoblast function,¹⁵ increased cortical porosity, and risk of fragility fractures despite higher average bone mineral density.^18,37 Additionally, diabetic nephropathy impairs vitamin D metabolism, altering bone healing and likely contributing to the observed increased rate of nonunion in diabetic ankle fractures.^45
-47

Although operative management of diabetic ankle fractures poses greater risks than nondiabetic ankle fractures,^33,35 nonoperative treatment of ankle fractures in diabetic patients is associated with a 21-fold increase in complication rates when compared with operative treatment.³⁴ Additionally, those patients undergoing delayed surgical treatment following failed nonoperative management experience up to a 100% complication rate.³⁴ Given these poor outcomes, unstable ankle fractures in diabetic patients are rarely managed nonoperatively.

Although the presence of symmetric, distal peripheral neuropathy and diabetic nephropathy have been used as independent variables in studies of diabetic ankle fracture cohorts, these factors were generally treated as dichotomous in their analysis.^26,32,38,46 Despite this, the disease severity and diabetic sequelae likely affect complication rates after surgery. Wukich et al’s⁴⁶ single-center retrospective cohort study on postoperative complications in diabetic ankle fractures stratified patients based on the presence of complicated diabetes, defined as diabetes-associated peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, or peripheral arterial disease. Complicated diabetes increased the risk of malunion, nonunion, Charcot arthropathy, and need for revision surgery/arthrodesis when compared to patients with uncomplicated diabetes.⁴⁶ Additionally, Bohl et al⁷ identified end-stage renal disease as a significant risk factor for adverse events including infection and reoperation following ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Preoperative workup for diabetic patients commonly includes glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c), metabolic panels, and complete blood counts.¹⁰ HbA_1c has become the standard biomarker for estimating average glycemic levels for the preceding 3 months.²¹ Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is calculated based on serum creatinine and patient factors such as age, sex, and weight to calculate kidney function without directly measuring GFR.^36,39 Chronic kidney disease is diagnosed when eGFR is less than 60 mL/min per body surface area for at least 3 months with evidence of renal injury such as proteinuria.² The prevalence and severity of diabetic neuropathy, kidney disease, and vascular disease is directly correlated with duration of elevated blood glucose.^3,45 In this study, we seek to quantify and stratify risk of postoperative complications following operative management of diabetic ankle fractures based on perioperative clinical values.

Methods

This was an institutional review board–approved, retrospective review of patient data collected at a single level 1 trauma academic medical center.

Inclusion Criteria

All patients with ankle fractures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were identified. All patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of diabetes who sustained rotational ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation by orthopaedic surgery faculty, had electronically reviewable HbA_1c (measurement of glycated hemoglobin performed by clinical laboratory), and a comprehensive or basic metabolic panel result recorded within 3 months of the index procedure were included. Patients with at least 1 follow-up appointment were included.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients were excluded if they were <18 years old, sustained a pilon fracture, did not have an index procedure at our institution, did not have laboratory results within 3 months of the index procedure, had absence of a diabetes diagnosis, or postoperative ankle radiographs were unavailable for review.

Data Collection

All medical records were reviewed for relevant information including fracture pattern, whether it was an open injury, age at time of surgery, sex, laterality, smoking status, HbA_1c, eGFR, creatinine, end-stage renal disease, peripheral artery disease, body mass index (BMI), insulin dependence status, chronic kidney disease, neuropathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additional data included type of operative treatment (standard ORIF, maximum fixation ORIF, percutaneous fixation, fibular intramedullary nail, external fixator), unplanned return to operating room, unplanned return to surgery in days, revision surgery, days to readmission after discharge, SSI (superficial or deep), failure of fixation (nonunion, malunion), amputation, inpatient days, discharge disposition, and mortality. Maximal fixation ORIF was defined as the use of multiple transsyndesmotic screws and/or rigid locking plate constructs (Figure 1). Race-based eGFR modifiers were not used in our study.^1,17,24 All radiographs were reviewed to identify failure of fixation constructs or malunion if not captured in the clinical documentation alone.

Figure 1.

Example radiographs of a patient who underwent maximum fixation open reduction internal fixation and then experienced loss of reduction and deep infection necessitating irrigation and debridement, removal of hardware, and temporary fixation.

Radiographic Analysis

Plain radiographs were evaluated by 2 authors using Merge PACS software (2018; IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA). All available imaging including postoperative anteroposterior and lateral images of the ankle were reviewed. Anatomic alignment of the tibia was measured on anteroposterior and lateral postoperative radiographs. Failure of fixation was defined based on radiographic criteria outlined by Thordarson et al, which included talar tilt >2 mm, talar subluxation anteriorly or posteriorly >2 mm, eccentric joint space narrowing, asymmetry of the medial or lateral clear space on the mortise view, syndesmotic instability demonstrated by decreased tibiofibular overlap and/or increased tibiofibular clear space and shortening of the fibula assessed with talocrural angles⁴¹ (Figure 1). Radiographic findings were correlated with clinical examination and patient-reported symptoms to clinically define failure of fixation and the decision to return to the operating room.

Sample Size Determination

We identified 617 ankle fractures treated operatively at our institution during the study period. One hundred sixty patients were identified as diabetic; however, 70 were excluded for lacking laboratory studies within 3 months of the index procedure, resulting in a sample size of 91 ankle fractures in 90 patients. A CONSORT diagram depicting the flow of study patients is provided in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

CONSORT diagram depicting flow of patients in the study.

Statistical Methods

Descriptive statistics were applied to the variables presented in Table 1. Continuous variables are presented as means with SDs, and binomial variables are presented in proportions. Data were tested for normal distribution using visual inspection of bar charts and Shapiro-Wilk testing. For comparisons of normally distributed continuous variables between 2 cohorts, we used an independent samples Student t test. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using χ² tests. Comorbidities were analyzed using a univariate logistic regression model to assess association with SSI and complications (coded variable including SSI, unplanned return to operating room, nonunion, malunion). Factors that were found to be significant in the univariate model were then included in a multivariate model. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated using cross-tabulation, and a 2-tailed Fisher exact test was performed to determine statistical significance. All P values were 2 tailed. Statistical significance was determined as P values <.05. All analyses were performed using Stata, version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Table 1.

Patient Demographics.

Demographics
	No Complication (n = 65)	Complication^a (n = 26)	P Value
Age, y, mean (SD)	59.4 (12.8)	60.9 (14.5)	.63
BMI, mean (SD)	31.7 (7.6)	32.5 (9.2)	.69
Sex, n (%)
Male	20 (31)	5 (19)
Female	45 (69)	21 (81)
HbA_1c, %, mean (SD)	7.8 (1.8)	7.6 (2.1)	.69
Insulin dependent, n (%)	32 (49)	16 (62)	.32
Neuropathy, n (%)	18 (28)	15 (58)	.01
Current smoker, n (%)	21 (32)	3 (12)	.04
COPD, n (%)	9 (14)	1 (3.8)	.17
Peripheral arterial disease, n (%)	8 (12)	6 (23)	.19
CKD, n (%)	24 (37)	20 (77)	.001
eGFR, mean (SD)	68.1 (29.5)	43 (31)	.001
Creatinine, mean (SD)	1.4 (1.7)	2.8 (3.7)	.01
ESRD, n (%)	4 (6)	6 (23)	.02

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.

P < .05 in Bold.

Deep surgical site infection, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room.

Results

Patient Characteristics

Of the 160 diabetic ankle fracture patients identified (Figure 2), 90 (56%) had an available HbA_1c and metabolic panel within 3 months of the index procedure and met inclusion criteria. One patient sustained 2 discrete ipsilateral ankle fractures during the study period and met the laboratory criteria for both injuries. Patient characteristics stratified into “complication” (deep SSI, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room) and “no complication” cohorts are detailed in Table 1. There were significantly more patients in the complication cohort with diabetic neuropathy (P = .01) and chronic kidney disease (P = .001). Mean perioperative HbA_1c in patients who experienced postoperative complications was 7.6% (range: 5.1%-14.2%) compared with 7.8% (range: 5.6%-13.5%) who did not (P = .69).

Fracture Characteristics and Fixation Techniques

Bimalleolar fractures had the highest prevalence in both cohorts and 3 fractures were open. Standard ORIF was used in 68% of those without complication vs 50% with complication. The complication group had a higher prevalence of maximum fixation ORIF, percutaneous, intramedullary, and definitive external fixation (Table 2). The overall complication rate was 28.6% (26/91). Fourteen patients required an unplanned return to operating room. The most common unplanned procedures performed were irrigation and debridement, followed by hindfoot fusion. Of the 26 patients included in the complication cohort, 18 (69.2%) were observed to develop a nonunion. Four patients ultimately required amputation (4.4%).

Table 2.

Fracture Characteristics.

	No Complication, (n = 65)	Complication^a (n = 26)
Fracture pattern, n (%)
Unimalleolar	8 (12)	1 (4)
Bimalleolar	35 (54)	13 (50)
Trimalleolar	22 (34)	12 (46)
Open fracture	2 (3)	1 (4)
Closed fracture	63 (97)	25 (96)
Type of fixation, n (%)
Standard ORIF	44 (68)	13 (50)
Maximum fixation ORIF	13 (20)	6 (23)
Percutaneous	2 (4)	2 (7.5)
Fibular IM nail	4 (6)	2 (7.5)
External fixator	1 (2)	3 (12)
Patients with unplanned return to operating room, n (%)	0	15 (58)
Failure of fixation, n (%)	0
Nonunion, n (%)	0	18 (69)
Malunion, n (%)	0	1 (4)
Return to surgery, d, mean	0	123
Unplanned procedures, n
Hindfoot fusion	0	6
I&D	0	13
Revision ORIF	0	2
Amputation	0	4
Free flap	0	1
Local flap	0	2

Abbreviations: I&D, irrigation and debridement; IM, intramedullary; ORIF, open reduction internal fixation.

Deep surgical site infection, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room.

Discharge Disposition

For the complication-free cohort, 60% (39/65) were discharged home compared with 50% (13/26) in the complication cohort. The remainder of patients were discharged to acute or subacute rehabilitation (Table 3). Average inpatient days for the index procedure was longer in the complication cohort (6.7 vs 3.2), and this was statistically significant (P = .001). Average orthopaedic follow-up was 60 weeks postoperatively, with a median of 29 weeks and range 5-520 weeks.

Table 3.

Discharge Disposition.

Discharge Disposition	No Complication,n (%) or Mean (SD)	Complication,^a n (%) or Mean (SD)	P Value
Home	39 (60)	13 (50)
Acute rehab	10 (15)	4 (15)
Skilled nursing facility	16 (25)	9 (35)
Inpatient days, d, mean (SD)	3.2 (4.5)	6.7 (5.9)	.001
Duration of orthopaedic follow-up, wk mean (SD)	48.7 (77.4)	89 (93)
Mortality	7 (11)	2 (8)
Time to mortality postoperation, wk	181	117

Deep surgical site infection, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room.

P < .05 in Bold.

Logistic Regression

eGFR ≤60 was associated with deep SSI (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0-25; P = .05) as well as all complications (deep SSI, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room) (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.7-16; P = .003) (Table 4). Increasing creatinine level was also associated with deep SSI with a lesser effect size (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5; P = .04). Unplanned return to operating room (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99; P = .01) and failure of fixation (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98; P = .002) were inversely associated with GFR. Increasing creatinine level was directly associated with failure of fixation (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6; P = .02). Deep SSI was associated with peripheral artery disease (OR 7, 95% CI 1.7-28; P = .007). Amputation was associated with superficial SSI (OR 12.4, 95% CI 1.2-126; P = .03), deep SSI (OR 34.3, 95% CI 3.1-374; P = .004), and failure of fixation (OR 15.6, 95% CI 1.5-161; P = .02). Peripheral neuropathy was associated with total complications (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.6-12.7; P = .003). Of note, HbA_1c level and BMI were not associated with the complication, deep or superficial infection, return to operating room, or failure of fixation in our population (P > .05).

Table 4.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Ankle Fracture Surgery in Diabetic Patients.

Risk Factor	Deep SSI		Complication^a
	OR (95% CI)	P Value	OR (95% CI)	P Value
eGFR	0.97 (0.94-0.99)	.02	0.97 (0.95-0.99)	.003
Creatinine	1.2 (1.0-1.5)	.04	1.3 (1.0-1.6)	.05
eGFR ≤90	2.2 (0.26-18.8)	.46	1.6 (0.4-6.2)	.49
eGFR ≤80	4.8 (0.6-39.5)	.14	3.8 (1-14.2)	.04
eGFR ≤70	6.2 (0.74-51.2)	.09	5.2 (1.4-19.1)	.01
eGFR ≤60	4.11 (1.0-25)	.05	5.3 (1.7-16)	.003
eGFR ≤50	5.5 (1.3-23.3)	.019	4.1 (1.5-11.2)	.006
eGFR ≤40	8.8 (2.1-37.6)	.003	5.7 (2-16.2)	.001
Peripheral neuropathy	1.89 (0.50-7.1)	.34	4.6 (1.7-12.7)	.003
BMI ≥30	0.5 (0.14-2)	.36	0.6 (0.2-1.7)	.37
BMI ≥40	2.1 (0.5-8.9)	.34	1.4 (0.4-4.5)	.58
HbA_1c ≥7%	2.3 (0.6-9.4)	.26	1.1 (0.4-2.9)	.85
HbA_1c ≥8%	1.6 (0.4-6.1)	.51	0.8 (0.3-2.3)	.68
	Superficial SSI		Failure of Fixation
Peripheral neuropathy	1.5 (0.4-5.5)	.51	8.8 (2.6-30)	.001
eGFR	0.99 (0.9-1)	.81	0.96 (0.9-0.9)	.002
Creatinine	0.98 (0.7-1.3)	.92	1.3 (1-1.7)	.03

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SSI, surgical site infection.

Deep SSI, failure of fixation, unplanned return to operating room.

P < .05 in Bold.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to quantify and stratify risk of postoperative complications in diabetic ankle fractures based on commonly obtained perioperative laboratory values and the presence of diabetic sequela. Previous studies have classified the sequalae of prolonged hyperglycemia through the binary diagnoses of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, vascular disease, and nephropathy.^9,32,38,46 This study is the first to report that diabetic patients with a perioperative eGFR ≤80 mL/min per body surface area demonstrated a significantly higher rate of developing complications (OR 3.8, P = .04). The risk further increases for eGFR of 40 mL/min per body surface area or less (OR of 5.7, P = .003). Our overall complication rate (28.6%) was similar to rates reported by other retrospective studies (14.2%-34.2%),^12,46 and peripheral neuropathy was a significant factor for complication in our patients. Lastly, this study did not demonstrate a significant relationship between perioperative HbA_1c or BMI and complications. The cohort that did not experience complications had a higher mean perioperative HbA_1c; however, the difference was not statistically significant (7.8% vs 7.6%, P = .69).

Neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy are manifestations of microvascular tissue damage due to prolonged hyperglycemia.³ Endothelial cells are damaged through direct nonenzymatic glycosylation, increased reactive oxygen species, and multiple dysregulated cellular pathways.³ Following the operative management of ankle fractures, healing is impeded by neuropathic loss of protective sensation and renal osteodystrophy. Additionally, nephropathy and neuropathy are signs of increased bodywide microvascular disease burden, suggesting impaired oxygen and nutrient delivery to the operative site. This slows healing and likely predisposes the patient to infection and nonunion.

The biology of bone healing is altered in patients with diabetes, especially when nephropathy is present. In animal models, hyperglycemia and its resultant tissue alterations has been shown to decrease fracture callus cellularity and tensile strength,⁵ alter bone mineralization and crystalline structure,¹⁶ and decrease soft tissue healing and tensile strength.²² Nephropathy also directly alters bone composition via renal osteodystrophy. The kidneys, in response to parathyroid hormone, directly regulate calcium and phosphate levels and produce 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol which regulates intestinal absorption and inhibits parathyroid hormone secretion.⁴⁰ Additionally, the kidneys secrete multiple regulators of bone metabolism and healing, including bone morphogenetic protein 7 and erythropoietin.⁴⁴ In chronic kidney disease, altered mineral handling by the kidney leads to increased secretion of parathyroid hormone, driving demineralization of bone. These factors increase the risk of pathologic fractures, poorer bone quality at the time of surgery, and disruption of minerals and signaling pathways needed for healing. Perioperative eGFR serves as a surrogate for pathologies of bone metabolism in diabetic patients.

Unfortunately, operative management of diabetic ankle fractures cannot be indefinitely delayed so actions may be taken to mitigate risk. Principles from Charcot foot reconstruction including rigid locking constructs and prolonged immobilization have been adapted to ankle fractures in diabetic patients.²³ In revision cases, arthrodesis serves as a salvage procedure to enable ambulation.^42,43 Second, strict glycemic control should be maintained in the postoperative setting. Although not demonstrated in our series, other authors have demonstrated increased risk of infection following ankle ORIF for patients with HbA_1c greater than 6.5%.³¹ Postoperative hyperglycemia is a demonstrated risk factor for prosthetic joint infections.^30,48 When appropriate, surgeons should collaborate with internal medicine and/or endocrinology to optimize perioperative glucose control. Additionally, in our study, average length of stay was significantly longer in the complication cohort (6.7 vs 3.2), which warrants further investigation whether prolonged hospitalization is an additional risk factor for poor outcome.

As a retrospective cohort study, this investigation has several limitations. First, because peripheral neuropathy and neuropathy have shared pathogenesis, they are likely not independent variables. Second, our institution does not have a standardized pathway of perioperative management of diabetic ankle fractures, and although many patients were managed by the Foot and Ankle and Trauma subspecialty groups, a large subset of fractures were treated by surgeons of other subspecialties. Thus, perioperative assessment including obtaining laboratory studies, fixation constructs and postoperative protocols were variable among surgeons. This provided a pragmatic approach, although it potentially introduces additional confounders. We excluded patients with incomplete preoperative laboratory workup, which may have introduced selection bias; however, for the study endpoints, this was critical to allow for a comparison between groups. Our assessment of kidney function is at a single time point and did not include other markers for renal dysfunction such as proteinuria. Additionally, although our median follow-up was 29 weeks, some patients were discharged from care 5-8 weeks postoperatively by their surgeon and did not have additional follow-up. Lastly, this study solely focuses on surgical outcomes and did not collect patient-reported outcomes.

Ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus are at risk for potentially devastating complications, putting patients at risk of permanent disability, infection, complex limb salvage operations, and/or amputation. Extended durations of hyperglycemia lead to permanent microvascular damage manifesting as peripheral neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and other sequelae. Although acknowledged, it can be difficult to stratify the risk posed by a history of diabetes. Perioperative eGFR is an easily obtained laboratory value that can function as a surrogate indicator of a patient’s microvascular disease burden, including underlying neuropathy and altered bone metabolism in the setting of diabetic ankle fractures. This information allows both for the surgeon’s acknowledgment of risk as well as education of the patient and family members regarding perioperative risks and expected outcomes. The findings of our study highlight the importance of treating and preventing diabetic nephropathy. The authors advocate for close primary care follow-up for medical optimization of diabetic patients with ankle fractures. Future studies should investigate medical optimization of diabetic nephropathy in patients with ankle fractures and the effect on postoperative complications.

Footnotes

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division Institutional Review Board (IRB20-0431).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

William S. Polachek, MD,

Jason A. Strelzow, MD,

References

Ahmed

Nutt

Eneanya

, et al. Examining the potential impact of race multiplier utilization in estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation on African-American care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(2):464-471. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06280-5

Ammirati

AL.

Chronic kidney disease. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020;66(Suppl 1):s03-s09. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.66.S1.3

Barrett

Liu

Khamaisi

, et al. Diabetic microvascular disease: an endocrine society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(12):4343-4410. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01922

Bauer

Bengnér

Johnell

Redlund-Johnell

Supination-eversion fractures of the ankle joint: changes in incidence over 30 years. Foot Ankle. 1987;8(1):26-28. doi:10.1177/107110078700800107

Beam

Parsons

Lin

SS.

The effects of blood glucose control upon fracture healing in the BB Wistar rat with diabetes mellitus. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(6):1210-1216. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00066-9

Bengnér

Johnell

Redlund-Johnell

Epidemiology of ankle fracture 1950 and 1980. Increasing incidence in elderly women. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(1):35-37. doi:10.3109/17453678608993211

Bohl

Idarraga

Holmes

Hamid

Lin

Lee

Validated risk-stratification system for prediction of early adverse events following open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(19):1768-1774. doi:10.2106/JBJS.19.00203

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Published online 2020. Accessed March 20, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html

Chaudhary

Liporace

Gandhi

Donley

Pinzur

Lin

SS.

Complications of ankle fracture in patients with diabetes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(3):159-170. doi:10.5435/00124635-200803000-00007

10.

Cheisson

Jacqueminet

Cosson

, et al. Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients. Preoperative period. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(Suppl 1):S9-S19. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.020

11.

Chew

Tan

Sivathasan

Pavanni

Tan

SK.

Vascular assessment in the neuropathic diabetic foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:95-100.

12.

Costigan

Thordarson

Debnath

UK.

Operative management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):32-37. doi:10.3113/FAI.2007.0006

13.

Court-Brown

Caesar

. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-697. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130

14.

Daly

Fitzgerald

Melton

Ilstrup

DM.

Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(5):539-544. doi:10.3109/17453678709146395

15.

Ehnert

Freude

Ihle

, et al. Factors circulating in the blood of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients affect osteoblast maturation—description of a novel in vitro model. Exp Cell Res. 2015;332(2):247-258. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.12.011

16.

Einhorn

Boskey

Gundberg

Vigorita

Devlin

Beyer

MM.

The mineral and mechanical properties of bone in chronic experimental diabetes. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(3):317-323. doi:10.1002/jor.1100060303

17.

Eneanya

Yang

Reese

PP.

Reconsidering the consequences of using race to estimate kidney function. JAMA. 2019;322(2):113-114. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5774

18.

Farr

Drake

Amin

Melton

McCready

Khosla

In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(4):787-795. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2106

19.

Flynn

Rodriguez-del Rio

Pizá

PA.

Closed ankle fractures in the diabetic patient. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(4):311-319. doi:10.1177/107110070002100407

20.

Ganesh

Pietrobon

Cecílio

WAC

Pan

Lightdale

Nunley

JA.

The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1712-1718. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02625

21.

Goodney

Newhall

Bekelis

, et al. Consistency of hemoglobin A1c testing and cardiovascular outcomes in medicare patients with diabetes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(8):e003566. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003566

22.

Goodson

Hung

TK.

Studies of wound healing in experimental diabetes mellitus. J Surg Res. 1977;22(3):221-227. doi:10.1016/0022-4804(77)90137-8

23.

Gougoulias

Oshba

Dimitroulias

Sakellariou

Wee

Ankle fractures in diabetic patients. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(8):457-463. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.5.200025

24.

Grubbs

Precision in GFR reporting: let’s stop playing the race card. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(8):1201-1202. doi:10.2215/CJN.00690120

25.

Guyer

AJ.

Foot and ankle surgery in the diabetic population. Orthop Clin North Am. 2018;49(3):381-387. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2018.02.012

26.

Haddix

Clement

Tennant

Ostrum

RF.

Complications following operatively treated ankle fractures in insulin- and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018;11(3):206-216. doi:10.1177/1938640017714867

27.

Huang

Basu

O’Grady

Capretta

. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2225-2229. doi:10.2337/dc09-0459

28.

Jones

Maiers-Yelden

Marsh

Zimmerman

Estin

Saltzman

CL.

Ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):489-495. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15724

29.

Kannus

Palvanen

Niemi

Parkkari

Järvinen

Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people: Finnish statistics during 1970-2000 and projections for the future. Bone. 2002;31(3):430-433. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00832-3

30.

Kheir

Tan

Kheir

Maltenfort

Chen

AF.

Postoperative blood glucose levels predict infection after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(16):1423-1431. doi:10.2106/JBJS.17.01316

31.

Liu

Ludwig

Ebraheim

NA.

Effect of the blood HbA_1c level on surgical treatment outcomes of diabetics with ankle fractures. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):203-208. doi:10.1111/os.12047

32.

Liu

Ahn

Raspovic

, et al. Increased rates of readmission, reoperation, and mortality following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures are associated with diabetes mellitus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(3):470-474. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.023

33.

Loder

RT.

The influence of diabetes mellitus on the healing of closed fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:210-216.

34.

Lovy

Dowdell

Keswani

, et al. Nonoperative versus operative treatment of displaced ankle fractures in diabetics. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(3):255-260. doi:10.1177/1071100716678796

35.

McCormack

Leith

JM.

Ankle fractures in diabetics. Complications of surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(4):689-692. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.8648

36.

Miller

WG.

Reporting estimated GFR: a laboratory perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(4):645-648. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.032

37.

Patsch

Burghardt

Yap

, et al. Increased cortical porosity in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(2):313-324. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1763

38.

SooHoo

Krenek

Eagan

Gurbani

Zingmond

DS.

Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1042-1049. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00653

39.

Stevens

Coresh

Greene

Levey

AS.

Assessing kidney function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2473-2483. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054415

40.

Tejwani

Schachter

Immerman

Achan

Renal osteodystrophy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(5):303-311. doi:10.5435/00124635-200605000-00006

41.

Thordarson

DB.

Patients with a crooked radiograph after ankle fracture: what to do?

Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(4):355-358. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0355

42.

Vaudreuil

Fourman

Wukich

DK.

Limb salvage after failed initial operative management of bimalleolar ankle fractures in diabetic neuropathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(3):248-254. doi:10.1177/1071100716676063

43.

Wallace

Liskutin

Schiff

Pinzur

MS.

Ankle fusion following failed initial treatment of complex ankle fractures in neuropathic diabetics. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26(2):189-192. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.010

44.

Wei

Yin

Xie

Roles of the kidney in the formation, remodeling and repair of bone. J Nephrol. 2016;29(3):349-357. doi:10.1007/s40620-016-0284-7

45.

Wukich

DK.

Diabetes and its negative impact on outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop. 2015;6(3):331-339. doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i3.331

46.

Wukich

Joseph

Ryan

Ramirez

Irrgang

JJ.

Outcomes of ankle fractures in patients with uncomplicated versus complicated diabetes. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(2):120-130. doi:10.3113/FAI.2011.0120

47.

Wukich

Kline

AJ.

The management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1570-1578. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01673

48.

Yang

Sun

Liu

Is hemoglobin A1c and perioperative hyperglycemia predictive of periprosthetic joint infection following total joint arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(51):e8805. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000008805