Abstract
Category
Ankle; Trauma
Introduction/Purpose:
Critical Sized Defects (CSD) defined as bone loss greater than 1-2 cm in length or greater than 50% loss in circumference of bone remains a significant challenge in orthopaedic surgery. Patients can acquire these defects through trauma, nonunion post fracture, tumor removal, avascular necrosis, and congenital abnormalities. Custom 3D printed porous Titanium scaffolds are increasingly being used to treat CSD in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Implantation of 3D printed cages is considered a salvage procedure offered after the patient has failed other procedures. Implants fill the space of the defect, provide mechanical strength and provide opportunity for osseous integration. As implementation of this surgical technique is relatively new, further research is needed to assess surgical outcomes and inform future surgical decision making.
Methods:
This is a retrospective chart review study which examines surgical outcomes after using 3D printed Titanium cages. Patients who received a 3D printed Titanium cage between 1/1/2013 and 11/01/2018 with at least 1 year follow-up were included in this study. Primary outcome is device failure defined as removal of implant for any reason. If applicable, mechanism of failure was recorded for each case. Patient specific factors such as age, gender, race, BMI, diabetes status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, number of foot and ankle surgeries, prior limb infections and laterality of defect were recorded in addition to surgical variables including geometry of implant, duration of surgery, and perioperative antibiotics
Results:
18 patients who received custom 3D printed Titanium cages were included in this study. Of the 18 patients, 5 patients (27.8%) had device failure, defined as removal of implant. Of the 5 failures, 2 were removed due to infection while the other 3 were removed due to hardware failure including fractured cage, broken screw and loose fixation.
Conclusion:
Custom 3D printed Titanium was successfully implemented in 72.2% of patients. Implants were only removed due to infection (2 patients) or mechanical failure of device (3 patients). Future studies need to be powered to determine if certain patient specific factors are associated with device failure. Data from this study and subsequent studies can be used to design better implants, decide who is a good surgical candidate, and create preoperative therapies to improve modifiable risk factors
