This article aims to explore the role of heritage impact assessment (HIA) as a tool to safeguard world heritage sites from the adverse impacts of proposed projects as well as to recommend effective mitigation measures to create the balance between preservation and development. These mitigations will help the decision makers to take the right decision concerning the potential development.
The methodology adopts a qualitative approach which is based on semi-structured interviews with site managers of two world heritage sites: historic areas of Istanbul in Turkey and the Giza pyramids in Egypt. Other interviews were conducted with some archaeologists and some governmental bodies in both countries to evaluate the level of awareness of HIA and assess the current and potential threats resulting from development proposals. Consequently, the article applies the HIA methodology to evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects in both heritage sites.
HIA can be an effective solution in order to eliminate the contradictions between the stakeholders investing in world heritage sites. The findings revealed that both world heritage sites are threatened by infrastructure and development projects. There is a lack of professionals who are able to conduct HIA methodology, thus Turkey and Egypt depend mainly on foreign experts to conduct it.
AlessandroC. (2015). Istanbul World Heritage property: Representing and cataloguing the material and intangible assets for local sustainable development. In GambardellaC. (Ed.), Heritage and technology. Mind, knowledge, experience. In the proceedings of the XIII International Forum of Studies ‘Le Vie dei Mercanti’, Aversa and Capri (pp. 2261–2269). Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/world_heritage/Analysis%20of%20Threats%201994-2004%20final.pdf
2.
AvdoulosE. (2015). Istanbul’s Hagia Sophia: Challenges of managing sacred places. In CastilloA., (Ed.), Proceedings of the II International Conference on Best Practices in World Heritage: People and Communities (pp. 180–203). Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
3.
Bassetlaw District Council (2013). A guide to heritage impact assessments. Retrieved from https://www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/media/69843/HeritageImpactAssessmentGuidance.pdf
4.
BelkayaH., OzmenI., & KaramutI. (2008). The Marmaray project: Managing a large scale project with various stake holders. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. II, pp. 1268–1272). London: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
5.
BondA., BxterR., LangstaffL., & LundströmS. (2004). Dealing with the cultural heritage aspect of environmental impact assessment in Europe. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(1), 37–45. doi: 10.3152/147154604781766085
6.
Development Bureau (DEVB) (2009). Heritage impact assessment mechanism for capital works projects (DEVB TC(W) No. 6, pp. 1–11). Retrieved from https://www.heritage.gov.hk/images/impact/TC_Heritage.pdf
7.
El-BatranM., NazmyN., & SweedanM. (2006). Impact of informal urban expansion on the pyramids area, Giza-Egypt. In Abdel-HadiA., TolbaM., & SolimanS. (Eds.), Proceedings of Environment, health and sustainable development (IAPS Vol. 19, pp. 193–206). Alexandria: IAPS.
8.
ELC Group Consulting and Engineering Inc (2016). Impact assessment for the Eurasia tunnel project approach road realignment near the Marble Tower (Non Technical Summary [NTS]). Retrieved from https://www.avrasyatuneli.com/_assets/pdf/mermer_kule_tasarim_degisikligi-en.pdf
9.
ErkanY. (2014). Monitoring historic areas of Istanbul: Potentials for historic urban landscape approach. Architecture & Science Journal, 1(3), 1–16.
10.
European Commission (2009). Impact assessment guidelines. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/iag_2009_en.pdf
11.
FlemingA.K. (2008, May4–10). Standards of international cultural and financial institutions for cultural heritage protection and management. Paper presented at the Art and Science of Impact Assessment 28th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Perth Convention Exhibition Centre, Perth, Australia. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.501.9482&rep=rep1&type=pdf
12.
FlemingA.K. (2011, December12–13). Assessing impacts: A constructive relationship between heritage conservation and development. Paper presented at Heritage Conservation and Development—Partners or Rivals? International Conference, Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.gov.hk/conference2011/en/pdf/7_Arlene%20K%20Fleming_ppt.pdf
13.
General Organization for Physical Planning (2012). The strategic plan for the area of the Giza pyramids and the development of Nazlat El Seman area. Retrieved from http://gopp.gov.eg/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NazletEl-SemanDevelopment-AR30-5-2013.pdf
14.
GültekinN. (2012). Cultural heritage management: The case of historical peninsula in Istanbul. Gazi University Journal of Science, 25(1), 235–243. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/83461
15.
Harlow Council (2013). Heritage impact assessment: Temple fields North East. Retrieved from http://www.harlow.gov.uk/sites/harlowcms/files/files/documents/files/LDO-Templefields%20Heritage%20Impact%20Assessment_Part1.pdf
16.
HuidsN., RietE., VeldpausL., & RodersA. (2013). Towards the heritage impact assessment of tourism: The historic route of Macao as case study. In ChenH., LinY., WangL., & RobinsonM. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Tourism and the Shifting Values of Cultural Heritage: Visiting Pasts, Developing Futures (pp. 100–120). England, Ironbridge International Institute for Cultural Heritage, University of Birmingham.
17.
ICOMOS (2005). Threats to world heritage sites 1994–2004: An analysis. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/world_heritage/Analysis%20of%20Threats%201994-2004%20final.pdf
18.
ICOMOS (2011). Guidance on heritage impact assessments for cultural world heritage properties. A publication of the International Council on Monuments and Sites. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/world_heritage/HIA_20110201.pdf
19.
ICOMOS (2017). Addendum evaluations of nominations of cultural and mixed properties. (ICOMOS report for the World Heritage Committee 41st ordinary session, Kracow). Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2017/whc17-41com-inf8B1-Add2-en.pdf
20.
International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) (2009). What is impact assessment? Retrieved from https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/What_is_IA_web.pdf
21.
JonesC., & SlinnP. (2008). Cultural heritage in EIA: Reflections on practice in North West Europe. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 10(3), 215–238. doi: 10.1142/S1464333208003056
22.
KamelM., & HassanM. (2014). Ancient Memphis Mit Rahina Human-induced impact assessment heritage impact assessment: The joint master in heritage conservation and site management. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamed_Amer32/publication/291833417_AncientMemphis_Human-induced_Impact_Assessment/links/56a7463c08ae860e02554f26/Ancient-Memphis-Human-induced-Impact-Assessment.pdf
23.
KloosM. (2016). Heritage impact assessment: The potential impact of the Stockholm bypass and Ekerö road project on the outstanding universal value of the world heritage property of Royal Domain of Drottningholm. Retrieved from https://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/ad8dce3a833f465abc538eff8cf7c010/aktuella-handlingar/hia_drottningholm_web_20161130.pdf
24.
LisitzinK. (2012). Heritage impact assessment: The potential impact of the Stockholm bypass and Ekerö road project on the outstanding universal value of the world heritage property of Royal Domain of Drottningholm Sweden (Report phase I). Retrieved from https://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/8490f85abc0c491e97954d7ec3e3d639/arkiv/hia_forbifart_stockholm_20120201.pdf
25.
Ontario Ministry of Culture (2010). Heritage impact assessment: Terms of reference—City of Toronto’s inventory of heritage properties. Retrieved from http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca
26.
OztaşC., & AkıM. (2014). Istanbul historic peninsula: Pedestrianization project, current state assessment. Retrieved from http://www.wrirosscities.org/sites/default/files/EMB14-Istanbul-Historic-Peninsula-Pedestrianization-EMBARQ-Turkey.pdf
27.
PartalA. (2013). Impact assessment: A tool to assist cultural sustainable development. In DengH. & StandingsC. (Eds.), People and the Planet 2013 Conference proceedings: Transforming the future (pp. 1–12). Melbourne: RMIT University.
28.
PopeJ., BondA., Morrison-SaundersA., & RetiefF. (2013). Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41, 1–9.
29.
RodersA., & OersR. (2012). Guidance on heritage impact assessments learning from its application on world heritage site management. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 104–114.
30.
RodersA., BondA., & TellerJ. (2013). Determining effectiveness in heritage impact assessments. In IAIA13 Conference Proceedings’ Impact Assessment the Next Generation 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Retrieved from https://conferences.iaia.org/2013/pdf/Final%20papers%20review%20process%2013/Determining%20effectiveness%20in%20heritage%20impact%20assessments.pdf
31.
RogersA. (2011). Cultural heritage impact assessment: Making the most of the methodology. Paper presented at Heritage Conservation Conference: Conserving Heritage and development—Partners or Rivals?Development Bureau, Hong Kong SARG. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.gov.hk/conference2011/b5/pdf/5_Dr%20Ayesha%20Pamela%20Rogers.pdf
32.
RuossE., & AlfarèL. (2013). Sustainable tourism as driving force for cultural heritage sites development: Planning, Managing and Monitoring Cultural Heritage Sites in South East Europe. CHERPLAN, EU and South East Europe: National Research Council of Italy. Retrieved from http://www.southeast-europe.net/document.cmt?id=808
33.
SagniaB. (2004). Framework for cultural impact assessment. International Network for Cultural Diversity. Retrieved from http://www.dmeforpeace.org/sites/default/files/FRAMEWORK%20FOR%20CULTURAL%20IMPACT%20ASSESSMENT%20(INCD)_2004.pdf
34.
SaundersM., LewisP., & ThornhillA. (2005). Research methods for business students. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
35.
SeyedashrafiB., RavankhahM., WeidnerS., & ChairM. (2017). Applying heritage impact assessment to urban development: World heritage property of Masjed-e Jame of Isfahan in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 30, 213–224.
36.
ShetawyA., & El KhateebS. (2009). The pyramids plateau: A dream searching for survival. Tourism Management, 30(6), 819–827.
TurgutS. (2012). Site management process and urban renewal in Istanbul: Historical peninsula. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 155, 859–868. doi: 10.2495/SC120722
39.
Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2011). Istanbul historic peninsula site management plan. Retrieved from http://www.alanbaskanligi.gov.tr/files/management_plan_090312_tum.pdf
40.
Turkish National Commission for UNESCO (2016). UNESCO world heritage in Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org.tr/Pages/466/120/UNESCO%20World%20Heritage%20in%20Turkey%202016
41.
UNESCO (n.d.). Historic Areas of Istanbul. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/356/
42.
UNESCO (n.d.). Memphis and its Necropolis: The Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/86
43.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2014). Periodic report: Second cycle. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2015/whc15-39COM-10A-en.pdf.
44.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2017a). Historic areas of Istanbul (Turkey): State of conservation report. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3580
45.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2017b). Historic areas of Istanbul (Turkey): Mission report. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3580
46.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2017c). Memphis and its Necropolis: The pyramids fields from Giza to Dahshur (Egypt), state of conservation report. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/86/documents/
47.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2017d). Memphis and its Necropolis: The pyramids fields from Giza to Dahshur (Egypt), mission report. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/86/documents/
48.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2017e). Decisions adopted during the 41st session of the World Heritage Committee. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2017/whc17-41com-18-en.pdf
49.
VazE., CaetanoM., & NijkampP. (2011). A multi-level spatial urban pressure analysis of the Giza pyramid plateau in Egypt. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 6(2), 99–108.
50.
VeillonR. (2014). State of conservation of world heritage properties. A statistical analysis (1979–2013). Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
51.
VeldpausL., HuidsN., RietE., & RodersA. (2015). Towards the heritage impact assessment of tourism: The historic route of Macao as case study. Eindhoven: Faculty of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4799.9847
52.
WHITRAP (2012). Heritage impact assessments. Report of the training workshop on HIA. Retrieved from http://www.whitr-ap.org/index.php?classid=1462&id=49&t=show
