Chennai’s governance network plays a critical role in shaping the city’s waterscape. Through an urban political ecology (UPE) lens, this article investigates the intersection between water as part of nature and water as shaped by social context, with a focus on existing governance networks. Using a combination of social network analysis and thematic analysis, the article studies data gathered from in-depth semi-structured interviews, workshop discussions with stakeholders, and extensive literature and policy reviews. The analysis reveals a need to reconfigure the urban governance network and the relationships therein to work towards a sustainable future for Chennai’s water system. The article concludes by offering policy recommendations to leverage the strengths and weaknesses of the complex inter-agency relations that shape Chennai’s current waterscape.
AhlersR., CleaverF., RuscaM., & SchwartzK. (2014). Informal space in the urban waterscape: Disaggregation and co-production of water services. Water Alternatives, 7(1), 1–14.
2.
AnsellC., & GashA. (2017). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. 10.1093/jopart/mux030
3.
AnsellC. K., & TorfingJ. (Ed.). (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. Routledge.
4.
ArabindooP. (2011). Mobilising for water: Hydro-politics of rainwater harvesting in Chennai. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 3(1), 106–126.
BakkerK. (2002). From state to market? Water mercantilización in Spain. Environment and Planning A, 34, 767–790.
7.
BevirM. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton University Press.
8.
BenzA., & PapadopoulosY. (2006). Governance and democracy: Comparing national, European and international experience. Routledge.
9.
BodinO., CronaB., & ErnstsonH. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective?Ecology & Society, 11, r2.
10.
BodinO., & CronaB. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relation patterns make a difference?Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.
11.
BremnerL. (2020). Planning the 2015 Chennai floods,EPE: Nature and Space, 3(3), 732–760.
12.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
13.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications.
14.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
15.
BrotoV. C., & BulkeleyH. (2013). Maintaining climate change experiments: Urban political ecology and the everyday configuration of urban infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1934–1948.
16.
BunceS., & DesforG. (2007). Introduction of ‘political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations’. Cities, 24(4), 251–258.
17.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
18.
CaniatoM., VaccariM., VisvanathanC., & ZurbruggC. (2014). Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: A step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Management, 34, 938–951.
19.
CoelhoK., NarayananS., VenkatT., & VijayabaskarM. (2011). State level background paper on Tamil Nadu. Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
20.
CoelhoK., KamathL., & VijayabaskarM. (2013). Participolis: Consent and contention in neoliberal urban India. Routledge.
21.
CoelhoK. (2018). Reading history and power in urban landscapes: The lens of urban political ecology. Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal, 1(2), 19–30.
22.
CookeJ., & LewisR. (2010). The nature of circulation: The political ecology of Chicago’s Michigan Avenue Bridge, 1909–1930. Urban Geography, 31(3), 348–368.
23.
CopeM. (2010). Coding qualitative data. In HayI. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (3rd ed., pp. 223–233). Oxford University Press.
24.
CorneaN., ZimmerA., & VéronR. (2016a). Ponds, power and institutions: The everyday governance of accessing urban water bodies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 395–409.
25.
CorneaN., VéronR., & ZimmerA. (2016b). Clean city politics: An urban political ecology of solid waste in West Bengal, India. Environment and Planning, 1–17. 10.1177/0308518X166820
26.
DevasahayamM. G. (2019, 15July). Chennai’s crisis is of governance, not water. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/chennais-crisis-is-of-governance-not-water/articleshow/70220266.cms
27.
DrewG. (2020). Political ecologies of water capture in an Indian ‘smart city’. Ethnos, 85(3), 435–453.
28.
D’SouzaR. & NagendraH. (2011). Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: The Agara Lake in Bangalore, India. Environmental Management, 47(5), 840–850.
29.
EdelenbosI., & van MeerkerkJ. (2016). Introduction: Three reflecting perspectives on interactive governance. In Critical reflections on interactive governance self-organization and participation in public governance (pp. 1–28). Edward Elgar Publishing.
30.
ErnstonH., SorlinS., & ElmqvistT. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services: The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13. 10.5751/ES-02589-130239
31.
ErnstonH., BarthelS., AnderssonE., & BorgströmS. T. (2010). Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 28.
32.
EstherS., & DevadasM. D. (2016). A calamity of a severe nature: Case study—Chennai, India. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 165, 227–236.
33.
GoldmanM., & NarayanD. (2019). Water crisis through the analytic of urban transformation: An analysis of Bangalore’s hydrosocial regimes. Water International, 44(2), 95–114.
34.
GoTN (Government of Tamil Nadu). (2017). Flood management and response in Chennai and its suburban areas. Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Performance Audit of Flood Management and Response in Chennai and Its Suburban Areas. Indian Audit and Accounts Department.
35.
GraftA., MahalingamA., RamachandranA., AyyangarA., HemasreeO., MankarD., SaiU. N., & RoyP. (2018). Chennai: State of water. Okapi Research and Advisory, Fields of View, Centre for Urbanisation, Buildings and Environment, IIT Madras.
36.
HarveyD. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Blackwell.
37.
HerzogC., HandkeC., & HittersE. (2019). Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis. In Van den BulckH., PuppisM., DondersK., & van AudenhoveL. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 385–401). Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
HeynenN., KaikaM., & SwyngedouwE. (Eds.). (2006a). In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. Routledge.
39.
HeynenN., PerkinsH., & RoyP. (2006b). The political ecology of uneven urban green space. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 3–25.
40.
HeynenN. (2014). Urban political ecology I: The urban century. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 598–604. 1177/0309132513500443
41.
HommesL., BoelensR., HarrisL. M., & VeldwischG. J. (2019). Rural–urban water struggles: Urbanizing hydrosocial territories and evolving connections, discourses and identities. Water International, 44(2), 81–94.
42.
JamesonS., & BaudI. (2016). Varieties of knowledge for assembling an urban flood management governance configuration in Chennai, India. Habitat International, 54, 112–123.
43.
JanakarajanS., ButterworthJ., MoriartyP., & BatchelorC. (2007). Strengthened city, marginalised peri-urban villages: Stakeholder dialogues for inclusive urbanisation in Chennai, India. In ButterworthJ., DucrotR., FaysseN., & JanakarajanS. (Eds.), Peri-urban water conflicts: Supporting dialogue and negotiation (pp. 51–76). IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre.
KooimanJ. (2003). Governing as governance. SAGE Publications.
46.
LakshmiK. (2019a, 28June). Chennai’s day zero: It’s not just meteorology but mismanagement that’s made the city run dry. The Hindu. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210105-day-zero-how-chennais-wetlands-could-save-it-from-drought
47.
LakshmiK. (2019b, 15November). Work of Chitlapakkam Lake to begin by end of November. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/work-on-chitlapakkam-lake-to-begin-by-november-end/article29976300.ece
48.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
49.
Le MeurP.-Y., & LundC. (2001). Everyday governance of land in Africa. Bulletin de l’APAD, 22. 10.4000/apad.48
50.
LonghurstR. (2016). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In CliffordN., CopeM., GilespieT., & FrenchS., (Eds.), Key methods in geography. SAGE Publications.
51.
McCarthyJ., & PrudhamS. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35, 275–283.
52.
MonstadtJ. (2009). Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: Insights from technology and urban studies. Environmental and Planning A, 41(8), 1924–1942.
53.
MukundanT. M. (2005). The ery systems of South India. Akash Ganga Trust.
54.
NarasimhanN. E. (2015, 11December). Chennai floods are the world’s 8th most expensive natural disaster in 2015. The Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/chennai-floods-are-world-s-8th-most-expensive-natural-disaster-in-2015-115121100487_1.html
55.
NarayanA. S., FischerM., & LuthiC. (2020). Social network analysis for water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH): Application in governance of decentralized wastewater treatment in India using a novel validation methodology. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7, 198.
56.
NDMA (National Disaster Management Authority of India). (n.d.). Tamil Nadu floods: Lessons learnt and best practices, a report. Government of India.
57.
PerreaultT. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–245.
58.
PortugaliJ. (2011). Complexity, cognition and the city. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
59.
RanganathanM., & BalazsC. (2015). Water marginalization at the urban fringe: Environmental justice and urban political ecology across the North–South divide. Urban Geography, 36(3), 403–423.
60.
Resilient Chennai. (2019). Chennai city resilience strategy. Rockefeller Foundation.
61.
RoumeauS., SeifelislamA., JamesonS., & KennedyL. (2015). Water governance and climate change issues in Chennai (USR 3330 ‘Savoirs et Mondes Indiens’ Working Papers Series No. 8). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01144122
62.
RoyP., KumarK., KarunakaranZ., AyyangarA., RamachandranA., BanerjeeA., GraftA., & MahalingamA. (2018a). Chennai: Urban visions. Okapi Research and Advisory, Fields of View, Centre for Urbanisation, Buildings and Environment. IIT Madras and Tamil Nadu State Land Use Research Board.
63.
RoyP., KumarK., KarunakaranZ., & AyyangarA. (2018b) Chennai: Emerging tensions in land, water, and waste governance. Okapi Research and Advisory, Fields of View, Centre for Urbanisation, Buildings and Environment. IIT Madras and Tamil Nadu State Land Use Research Board.
64.
RoyP., KumarK., KarunakaranZ., AyyangarA., RamachandranA., BanerjeeA., GraftA., MahalingamA., HemasreeO., MankarD., SaiU. N., PalavalliB. M., & KrishnaH. (2019). A platform for integrated water governance in metropolitan chennai: Developing future scenarios and strategies through participatory simulations. Okapi Research and Advisory, Fields of View, Centre for Urbanisation, Buildings and Environment. IIT Madras and Tamil Nadu State Land Use Research Board.
65.
SmithL. (2001). The urban political ecology of water in Cape Town. Urban Forum, 12(2), 204–224.
66.
Sofia JulietR. (2019, 1June). Chitlapakkam Rising asked to spearhead efforts to restore lake. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/chitlapakkam-rising-asked-to-spearhead-efforts-to-restore-lake/article27400216.ece
SorensenE., & TorfingJ. (2019). Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463. 10.1080/14719037.2018.1559342
69.
SrinivasanV., GorelickS. M., & GoulderL. (2010). Sustainable urban water supply in South India: Desalination, efficiency improvement, or rainwater harvesting?Water Resources Research, 46. 10.1029/2009WR008698
70.
SwyngedouwE., & HeynenN. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), 898–918.
71.
SwyngedouwE. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford University Press.
72.
SwyngedouwE. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
73.
SwyngedouwE. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: The production of nature, water, modernization in Spain. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 443–465.
74.
SwyngedouwE. (1997). Power, nature, and the city. The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador—1880–1990. Environmental Planning A, 29, 311–332.
75.
SwyngedouwE., KaikaM., & CastroJ. E. (2002). Urban water: A political-ecology perspective. Built Environment, 28(2), 124–137.
76.
SwyngedouwE. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 9–28.
77.
SteinC., ErnstsonH., & BarronJ. (2011). A social network approach to analysing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 1085–1092.
78.
SandstromA. (2008). Policy networks: The relation between structure and performance. Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
79.
SandstromA., & RovaC. (2010). Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 14.
80.
The Economic Times. (2019, 21June). Why Chennai’s water crisis should worry you. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/why-chennais-water-crisis-should-worry-you/articleshow/69885986.cms
81.
The Hindu. (2022a, 22April). Water storage comfortable. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/water-storage-comfortable/article65341917.ece
82.
The Hindu. (2022b, 4March). Encroachments from Chitlapakkam Lake removed, Govt. tells HC. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/encroachments-from-chitlapakkam-lake-removed-govt-tells-hc/article65188100.ece
83.
The Hindu Bureau. (2021, 31December). Chennai reels as rain arrives without notice. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/chennai-gridlocked-for-hours-after-intense-rains/article38073692.ece
84.
TorfingJ., PetersB. G., PierreJ., & SørensenE. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press.
85.
VaidyanathanA. (2001). Tanks of South India. Centre for Science and Environment.
86.
VerrebesT. (2014). Masterplanning the adaptive city. In Computational urbanism in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
87.
WassermanS., & FaustF. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
88.
YoungI. M., (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
89.
ZimmerA., VéronR., & CorneaN. (2020). Urban ponds, environmental imaginaries and (un)commoning: An urban political ecology of the pondscape in a small city in Gujarat, India. Water Alternatives, 13(2), 225–247.
90.
ZwarteveenM., Kemerink-SeyoumJ. S., KooyM., EversJ., GuerreroT. A., BatubaraB., BizaA., Boakye-AnsahA., FaberS., FlaminiA. C., Cuadrado-QuesadaG., FantiniE., GuptaJ., Hasan HorstR. T., JamaliH., JaspersF., ObaniP., SchwartzK., ShubberZ., SmitH., TorioP., TutusausM., & WesselinkA. (2017). Engaging with the politics of water governance. WIREs Water, 4(6), 1–9.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
