ConradsU. (1999). Programs and manifestoes on 20th-century architecture (17th printing). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
CorreaC.MehtaP.PatelS. (1965). Planning for Bombay. MARG, 18(3), 30–56.
3.
De CarloG. (2005). Architecture’s public. In Blundell-JonesPeter (ed.), Architecture and participation. London: Taylor & Francis.
4.
De GraafR. (2015, April24). Architecture is now a tool of capital, complicit in a purpose antithetical to its social mission. Architectural Review. Retrieved 10September2016, from https://www.architectural-review.com/archive/viewpoints/architecture-is-now-a-tool-of-capital-complicit-in-a-purpose-antithetical-to-its-social-mission/8681564.article
5.
DossalM. (2003). Eating up the sky: Private greed versus public need in Mumbai’s housing. In KamatManjiri (Ed.), Mumbai past and present (pp. 161–63). Mumbai: Indus Source Books.
6.
GoodmanR. (1971). After the planners. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
7.
KhilnaniS. (2004). The idea of India [Reprint, with a new introduction] (pp. 137–38). New Delhi [u.a.]: Penguin Books.
8.
LangJ.DesaiM.DesaiM. (1997). Architecture and independence: The search for identity—India 1880 to 1980 (1st ed.). Delhi, New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
MehrotraR. (2011). Architecture in India: Since 1990. Mumbai: Pictor.
10.
MehrotraR.HoskoteR.,MehtaK. (2014). The state of architecture: Practices & processes in India. 6January–20March2016, National Gallery of Modern Art & Urban Design Research Institute (UDRI), Mumbai.
11.
ShahJ. (2008). Contemporary Indian architecture. New Delhi: Roli Books.
12.
SorkinM. (2013). All over the map: Writing on buildings and cities (1st ed.). London: Verso.