India became a forerunner country for introducing the National Family Planning Programme (NFPP) in 1952, which has now witnessed shifts in policy approach and implementation. This requires re-examining programme commitment and investment for realization of fulfilling women’s reproductive rights. This narrative review article, using an intersectional feminist perspective, aims to analyze the policy approach of the Indian Family Planning Programme (FPP) and understand contraceptive practices of women within their social contexts. The analysis of the study reveals that the family planning in India has emerged not merely as a population control measure but as a state-led health intervention intending to bring social transformation in terms of fertility choices and practices. However, viewed through an intersectional perspective, while the policy discourse is framed with empowering intent and means for reshaping health and well-being, it is often found with overemphasis on female methods, producing feminization of contraception. Moreover, the policy lacks male involvement and the empowering effects are deeply unequal, stratified and gendered. Therefore, the pathway to achieve greater family planning practices among women with gender equality lies in promoting a right, choice and consent-based policy implementation.
AliB. (2011). Salafism and overpopulation: A challenge for Indonesia. In RanF., UnisaS., & SekherT. V. (Eds.), Population, gender and reproductive health. Rawat Publications.
2.
AmonkerR. G. (1975). Family planning performance in India. Asian Survey, 15(7), 586–597.
3.
AnthiasF. (2013). Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities, 13(1), 3–19.
4.
CharA., SaavalaM., & KulmalaT. (2010). Influence of mothers-in-law on young couples’ family planning decisions in rural India. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 154–162.
5.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press.
6.
CohenS. A., & RichardsC. L. (1994). The Cairo consensus: Population, development and women. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(6), 272–277.
7.
ColemanI., & LemmonG. (2011). Family planning and US foreign policy: Ensuring US leadership for healthy families and communities and prosperous, stable societies. Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep24184.5
8.
ContractorS. Q., DasA., DasguptaJ., & Van BelleS. (2018). Beyond the template: The needs of tribal women and their experiences with maternity services in Odisha, India. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 134.
9.
DeRoseL. F., & EzehA. C. (2010). Decision-making patterns and contraceptive use: Evidence from Uganda. Population Research and Policy Review, 29(3), 423–439.
10.
DevarajK., GausmanJ., MishraR., KumarA., KimR., & SubramanianS. V. (2024). Trends in prevalence of unmet need for family planning in India: Patterns of change across 36 states and union territories, 1993–2021. Reproductive Health, 21(1), 48.
11.
DharmalingamA. (1995). The social context of family planning in a South Indian village. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(3), 98–103.
12.
Diamond-SmithN., CampbellM., & MadanS. (2012). Misinformation and fear of side-effects of family planning. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14(4), 421–433.
13.
DonaldsonP. J. (2002). The elimination of contraceptive acceptor targets and the evolution of population policy in India. Population Studies, 56(1), 97–110.
14.
ElmusharafK., ByrneE., & O’DonovanD. (2017). Social and traditional practices and their implications for family planning: A participatory ethnographic study in Renk, South Sudan. Reproductive Health, 14, 1–11.
15.
EwerlingF., McDougalL., RajA., FerreiraL. Z., BlumenbergC., ParmarD., & BarrosA. J. (2021). Modern contraceptive use among women in need of family planning in India: An analysis of the inequalities related to the mix of methods used. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 173.
16.
FollettC. (2020). Neo-malthusianism and coercive population control in China and India (Policy Analysis No. 897). Cato Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26887
17.
FreedmanR., & BerelsonB. (1976). The record of family planning programs. Studies in Family Planning, 7(1), 1–40.
18.
GargS., & SinghR. (2014). Need for integration of gender equity in family planning services. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 140(1), S147–S151.
19.
GayleH., & HammergrenJ. (Eds.). (2017). Her health, her lifetime, our world: Unlocking the potential of adolescent girls and young women. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
20.
HankivskyO., ReidC., CormierR., VarcoeC., ClarkN., BenoitC., & BrotmanS. (2010). Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9(1), 5.
21.
JainA., DwyerS. C., MozumdarA., & TobeyE. (2021). Not all women who experience side effects discontinue their contraceptive method: Insights from a longitudinal study in India. Studies in Family Planning, 52(2), 165–178.
22.
JejeebhoyS. J., SanthyaK. G., & ZavierA. F. (2014). Demand for contraception to delay first pregnancy among young married women in India. Studies in Family Planning, 45(2), 183–201.
23.
KavanaughM. L., & AndersonR. M. (2013). Contraception and beyond: The health benefits of services provided at family planning centers. Guttmacher Institute.
24.
LancetT. (2017). Family planning: Accelerating the way ahead. The Lancet, 390(10112), 2527.
25.
LedbetterR. (1984). Thirty years of family planning in India. Asian Survey, 24(7), 736–758.
26.
MacQuarrieK. L., & AzizA. (2021). Women’s decision-making and contraceptive use in Pakistan. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(2), 212–229.
27.
MaharatnaA. (2002). India’s family planning programme: An unpleasant essay. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(10), 971–981.
28.
MatthewsZ., PadmadasS. S., HutterI., McEachranJ., & BrownJ. J. (2009). Does early childbearing and a sterilization-focused family planning programme in India fuel population growth?Demographic Research, 20, 693–720.
29.
McIntoshC. A., & FinkleJ. L. (1995). The Cairo conference on population and development: A new paradigm?Population and Development Review, 21(2), 223–260.
30.
MenonN. (2012). Seeing like a feminist. Penguin Books.
31.
MOHFW. (2022, March). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21 India report. Retrieved, 12April2026, from https://dhsprogram.com/
32.
NairS. S., & KalarivayilR. (2017). ‘Saved a generation’: Campaigns against hazardous contraceptives in India. Asian Journal of Social Science, 45(1–2), 126–148.
33.
NashJ. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.
34.
OnonokponoD. N., OdimegwuC. O., & UsoroN. A. (2020). Contraceptive use in Nigeria: Does social context matter?African Journal of Reproductive Health, 24(1), 133–142.
35.
PakrashiD., MaitiS. N., GautamA., NandaP., BorkotokyK., & DattaN. (2022). Family planning campaigns on television and contraceptive use in India. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(3), 1492–1511.
36.
PandaS. N., BarikM., AcharyaA. S., KanungoS., & PatiS. (2023). Spatial distribution and factors influencing modern contraceptive practice among tribal married women in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey 5 (2019–2021). BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 318.
37.
PathareR. (1966). The family planning programme: A sociological analysis. Sociological Bulletin, 15(2), 44–62.
38.
RajanS., SpeizerI. S., CalhounL. M., & NandaP. (2016). Counseling during maternal and infant health visits and postpartum contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh, India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(4), 167–179.
39.
RegeS. (2000). ‘Real feminism’ and Dalit women: Scripts of denial and accusation. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(6), 492–495.
40.
RileyT., SullyE., AhmedZ., & BiddlecomA. (2020). Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 73–76.
41.
RobinsonW. C., & RossJ. A. (2007). Family planning: The quiet revolution. Population Council.
42.
RothS., & DashperK. (2016). Sociology in the 1980s: The rise of gender (and intersectionality). Sociology, 50(6), NP1–NP12.
43.
SahayA. (2021). Gender and family planning: A close reading of forty years of India’s family planning policies (1977–2019). Social and Political Research Foundation.
44.
SalkeldG. F. (1981). Communicating family planning in India. India International Centre Quarterly, 8(3/4), 277–288.
45.
SangarS. (2018). Bringing a women’s perspective to family planning. Current Science, 115(4), 633–637.
46.
SanthyaK. G. (2003). Changing family planning scenario in India: An overview of recent evidence. Population Council. https://doi.org/10.31899/rh5.1037
47.
SchulerS. R., HashemiS. M., CullumA., & HassanM. (1996). The advent of family planning as a social norm in Bangladesh: Women’s experiences. Reproductive Health Matters, 4(7), 66–78.
48.
SeltzerJ. R. (2002). The origins and evolution of family planning programs in developing countries. Rand Corporation.
49.
SenderowiczL., & HigginsJ. (2020). Reproductive autonomy is nonnegotiable, even in the time of COVID-19. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 147–151.
50.
SenderowiczL., & ValleyT. (2023). Fertility has been framed: Why family planning is not a silver bullet for sustainable development. Studies in Comparative International Development, 58, 1–32.
51.
SheykhiM. T. (2022). Population vs family planning in developing world: A sociological appraisal. Investigation in Gynecology Research & Women’s Health, 4(3), 334–346.
52.
SinghA., OgollahR., RamF., & PallikadavathS. (2012). Sterilization regret among married women in India: Implications for the Indian national family planning program. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(4), 187–195.
53.
SinghS. K., KashyapG. C., SharmaH., MondalS., & LegareC. H. (2023). Changes in discourse on unmet need for family planning among married women in India: Evidence from NFHS-5 (2019–2021). Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20464.
54.
SrinivasanK. (2014). Family planning programs in India: An overview and need for a revision. Madras Institute of Development Studies.
55.
SrinivasanK., SaxenaP. C., RoyT. K., & VermaR. K. (1991). Effect of family planning program components on contraceptive acceptance in four Indian states. International Family Planning Perspectives, 17(1), 14–24.
56.
Tiwari, & Tiwari. (2011). Gender bias and family planning programme in India. In PalM., BharatiP., GhoshB., & VasuluT. S. (Eds.), Gender and discrimination: Health, nutritional status, and role of women in India. Oxford India Paperbacks.
57.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). World family planning 2022: Meeting the changing needs for family planning: Contraceptive use by age and method. United Nations.
58.
UnnithanM. (2011). Learning from infertility: Gender, health inequalities and faith healers in women’s experiences of disrupted reproduction in Rajasthan. In DoronA. S. S. A. & BroomA. (Eds.), Health, culture, and religion in South Asia: Critical perspectives. Routledge.
59.
ViczianyM. (1982a). Coercion in a soft state: The family-planning program of India: Part I: The myth of voluntarism. Pacific Affairs, 55(3), 373–402.
60.
ViczianyM. (1982b). Coercion in a soft state: The family-planning program of India: Part 2: The sources of coercion. Pacific Affairs, 55(4), 557–592.
61.
VisariaL., JejeebhoyS., & MerrickT. (1999). From family planning to reproductive health: Challenges facing India. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 44–49.
62.
VishwakarmaM., & ShekharC. (2022). Covert use of reversible contraceptive methods and its association with husband’s egalitarian gender attitude in India. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 460.
63.
VoraK. S., SaiyedS., & NatesanS. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on family planning services in India. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 1785378.
64.
WarwickD. P. (2023). Culture and the management of family planning programs. Medical Anthropology, 42(4), 359–376.
65.
WeberL., & Parra-MedinaD. (2003). Intersectionality and women’s health: Charting a path to eliminating health disparities. In Gender perspectives on health and medicine (pp. 181–230). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
66.
World Health Organization. (2021). Policies, programme and services for comprehensive abortion care in South-East Asia region.
