After the abolition of the landlord system in the Indian Sundarban islands, the Munda people have concentrated more on agricultural activities. The tribal people have gone through changing sociocultural and economic processes to cope with the socio-physical environment in the Indian Sundarban but do not wish to convert to Hinduism. The enrichment of tribal identity and the development of a strong social consciousness among tribal people have created a space for interaction and symbiotic relationships within the community. The social consciousness of tribal identity is mainly a characteristic of the middle class, rather than the tribal community at large, but economic dependency governs the interactions between tribal and non-tribal people rather than concepts of purity and pollution. The infrastructural development in the Sundarban islands increases the flow of resources and the mobility of outsiders. Tribal villages are facing challenges due to the presence of new communities and settlements near the tribal hamlets. They have realized that tribal communities cannot be isolated from the socio-economic and political changes in Sundarban islands. It allows them to assimilate more with non-tribal people to adjust and adapt to changes. Socio-economic adaptation of the Munda people is a way to adjust to socio-economic changes in the Sundarban region without compromising much with their sociocultural identity. However, sociocultural adaptation is more about individual choices than community choices.
BarrS. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: Citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227–240.
2.
BaviskarA. (2005). In the belly of the river: Tribal conflicts over displacement in the Narmada Valley. Oxford University Press.
3.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34.
4.
BoseN. K. (1941). The Hindu method of tribal absorption. Science and Culture, 7(5), 188–194.
5.
BristolL. M. (1915). Social adaptation: A study in the development of the doctrine of adaptation as a theory of social progress. Harvard University Press.
6.
CliffordJ. (1988). The predicament of culture. Harvard University Press.
7.
DasguptaD. (2018, October31). Fish population declining in the Sundarbans. Dialogue Earth. https://dialogue.earth/en/nature/fish-population-declining-in-the-sundarbans/
8.
ElwinV. (1964). The tribal world of Verrier Elwin: An autobiography. Oxford University Press.
9.
FanL. (2004). Acculturation strategies among Chinese overseas students in America [Unpublished master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology].
10.
FernandesW. (2005). Development induced displacement: Impact on tribal women. In PfefferG. & BeheraD. K. (Eds.), Contemporary society: Tribal studies—Tribal situation in India (pp. 211–229). Concept Publishing Company.
11.
FettermanD. M. (1989). Ethnography step by step: Applied social research methods, Series 17. Sage Publications.
12.
FordhamM. (1998). The politics of language and the survival of indigenous culture: From suppression to reintroduction in the formal classroom. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(1), 40–47.
13.
GaventaJ. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Clarendon Press.
14.
GenzukM. (2001). A synthesis of ethnographic research. University of Southern California.
15.
GollnickD. M., & ChinnP. C. (1998). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society. Prentice Hall.
16.
Government of India (GoI). (2001). Census of India 2001. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Retrieved 15October2023, from https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/en/data/census-tables
17.
GudykunstW. B. (1995). Anxiety uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In WisemanR. L. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Sage Publications.
18.
GuptaA., & FergusonJ. (1992). Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23.
19.
GuptaA., & FergusonJ. (Eds.). (2001). Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology. Duke University Press.
20.
HiềnN. T. (2016). Cultural adaptation, tradition, and identity of diasporic Vietnamese people: A case study in Silicon Valley, California, USA. Asian Ethnology, 75(2), 441–459.
21.
JalaisA. (2007). The Sundarbans: Whose world heritage site?Conservation and Society, 5(3), 335–342.
22.
JayaramN. (2009). The study of Indian diaspora. In AtalY. (Ed.), Sociology and social anthropology in India. ICSSR.
23.
KimY. Y., & GudykunstW. B. (1988). Cross cultural adaptation: Current approaches. International and Intercultural Communication Annual 11. Sage Publications.
24.
KosambiD. D. (1975). The culture and civilization of ancient India in historical outline. Vikas Publishing House.
25.
LahiriJ. (2003). The Namesake. Houghton Mifflin Company.
26.
LeonardK. (1992). Finding one’s own place: The imposition of Asian landscapes on rural California. In RouseR., FergusonJ., & GuptaA. (Eds.), Power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 113–136). Westview Press.
27.
MajumdarD. N. (1994). Races and cultures of India. Universal Publishers.
28.
MalinowskiB. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays. The Free Press.
29.
MukhopadhyayS. (1976). A profile of Sunderban tribes. Frima KLM.
30.
NairK. S. (1978). Ethnicity and urbanization: A study of South Indian immigrants in Pune. Ajanta Publications.
31.
NandaS., & WarmsR. L. (2002). Cultural anthropology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
32.
PetersJ. (1992). Near-sight and far-sight: Media, place, and culture. In RouseR., FergusonJ., & GuptaA. (Eds.), Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 75–92). Westview Press.
33.
RahaM. K. (1999). The tribes of India: Patterns and problems of identity. In BeheraD. K. & PfefferG. (Eds), Contemporary society: Tribal studies (pp. 75–92). Concept Publishers.
34.
RayR., ChakrabortyI., & BhattacharyyaN. (2002). A study among some ‘Meendharas’ of Sunderbans, West Bengal. The Anthropologist, 1(2), 83–89.
35.
RedfieldR., LintonR., & HerskovitsM. J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149–152.
36.
RoyS. C. (1970). The Mundas and their country. Asia Publishing House.
37.
Roy-BurmanB. K. (1972). Tribal demography: A preliminary appraisal. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), Tribal situation in India (pp. 39–58). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
38.
SarkarS. K., & BhattacharyaA. K. (2003). Conservation of biodiversity of the coastal resources of Sundarbans, Northeast India: An integrated approach through environmental education. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47(1–6), 260–264.
39.
SchleiterM., & de MaakerE. (2010). Indigenous India indignity as a cultural practice: ‘Tribe’ and the state in India. The Focus, 53, 53–57.
40.
SinghK. S. (1985). Tribal society in India. Manohar.
41.
SrinivasM. N. (1966). Religion and society among the Coorgs of South India. Asia Publishing House.
42.
StappD. C., & BurneyM. S. (2002). Tribal cultural resource management: The full circle to stewardship. AltaMira Press.
43.
SundarN. (2010). Subalterns and sovereigns: An anthropological history of Bastar (1854–2006). Oxford University Press.
44.
TopalH. F., HuntD. V. L., & RogersC. D. F. (2021). Exploring urban sustainability understanding and behaviour: A systematic review towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 13, 1139.
45.
WenjingX. (2005). Virtual space, real identity: Exploring cultural identity of Chinese diaspora in virtual community. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 395–404.
46.
XaxaV. (1999). Transformation of tribes in India terms of discourse. Economic & Political Weekly, 34(24), 1519–1524.
47.
XaxaV. (2005). Politics of language, religion and identity: Tribes in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 40(13), 1363–1370.
