In this article, Dr Ambedkar’s conversion to Buddhism in the light of Deeksha Bhoomi is discussed in terms of the anti-caste movement. The article also debates the differences in approach to the question of ‘graded inequality’ of casteism between M. K. Gandhi and B. R. Ambedkar in light of ethnographic narratives collected from people in the site and intellectuals based in the city. The difference between the site of Deeksha Bhoomi, which promotes Navayana Buddhism, and Mahabodhi Temple, which promotes Mahayana Buddhism, has been discussed, in relation to the different faces of cultural and political revival movements in India.
AmbedkarB. R. (2014). Annihilation of caste: The annotated critical edition. Verso Books.
2.
BardiaM. (2009). Dr. BR Ambedkar his ideas about religion and conversion to Buddhism. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 70(3), 737–749.
3.
BhabhaH. K. (2013). Postcolonial authority and postmodern guilt. In GrossbergL. (Ed.), Cultural studies (pp. 56–68). Routledge.
4.
BoseN. K. (1941). The Hindu method of tribal absorption. Science and Culture, 7(2), 188–194.
5.
DumontL. (1981). Homo heirarchicus: The caste system and its implications. Chicago University Press.
6.
FoucaultM. (2013). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
7.
GerthH. H., & MillsC. W. (1985). From Weber: Essays in sociology. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
GhuryeG. S. (1957). Caste and class in India. Popular Book Depot.
9.
Guha-ThakurtaT. (2004). Monuments, objects, histories: Institutions of art in colonial and post-colonial India. Columbia University Press.
10.
GuruG. (2009). Archaeology of untouchability. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(37), 49–56.
11.
HarveyD. C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–338.
12.
HuttonJ. H. (1932). Census of India, 1931. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 80(4154), 783–805.
13.
JalM. (2018). The phenomenology of silent blindness: Understanding caste in India, Part I. Critique, 46(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2018.1456622
14.
JosephM. T. (2013). Dr. BR Ambedkar’s views on religion: A sociological analysis. Indian Anthropologist, 43(2), 43–54.
15.
KosambiD. D. (1994). The culture and civilisation of ancient India in historical outline. S. Chand Publishing.
16.
KumarA. (1999). Untouchability removal movement in Bihar. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 60(1999), 582–591.
17.
PalshikarS. (2015). Ambedkar and Gandhi: Limits of divergence and possibilities of conversation. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(15), 45–50.
18.
PhuleJ. G. (1991). Slavery: In the civilized British government under the cloak of Brahminism. Educational Department of the Government of Maharashtra.
19.
SiegelP. N. (1986). The Meek and the militant: Religion and power across the world. Oxford University Press.
20.
SmithL. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
21.
SrinivasM. N. (1956). A note on Sanskritization and Westernization. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 15(4), 481–496.
22.
TurnbridgeJ. E., & AshworthG. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage. The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Belhaven Press.
23.
VidyarthiL. P. (1963). The Maler: A study in nature-man-spirit complex of a hill tribe in Bihar. Bookland Private Limited.
24.
VidyarthiL. P. (1978). The sacred complex in Hindu Gaya. Concept Publishing Company.
