This article examines how Natchathiram Nagargiradhu (2022) reconfigures Dalit subjectivity by politicizing intimacy. I ask: How does the film mobilize love to contest caste and gender governance? Using qualitative film analysis with scene segmentation and thematic coding of dialogue, mise en scène, sound and metatheatrical address, I analyse moments of caste confrontation, romantic negotiation and collective performance. The analytic lens combines Crenshaw’s structural and political intersectionality with Sharmila Rege’s Dalit feminist standpoint; findings are triangulated with peer-reviewed scholarship. The analysis demonstrates that the film reframes love as a counter-public practice that challenges caste discipline, deploys metatheatre to expose the performative production of purity and stigma, and articulates Rene as an agentive Dalit feminist subject rather than a liberal victim figure. I analyse how a Dalit standpoint reorganizes cinematic form and address, contributing to debates in ethnic and racial studies on representation, intimacy and minoritized publics. The study advances methodized film analysis of caste and speaks to comparative conversations on caste, gender and media.
bell hooks (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. South End Press.
2.
BordwellD., & ThompsonK. (2010). Film art: An introduction (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
3.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
4.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. Routledge.
5.
CrenshawK. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
6.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
7.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
8.
GuruG., & SarukkaiS. (2012). The cracked mirror: An Indian debate on experience and theory. Oxford University Press.
9.
HallS. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications.
10.
KusumaK. (2018). Dalit characters in Telugu cinema: From invisibility to assertion. Studies in South Asian Popular Culture, 16(1), 25–38.
11.
PaikS. (2014). Dalit women’s education in modern India: Double discrimination. Routledge.
12.
RaoA. (2009). The caste question: Dalits and the politics of modern India. University of California Press.
13.
RegeS. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of ‘difference’ and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint. Economic & Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.
RoseG. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
16.
RowenaJ. (2015). Rosy and the limits of representation: The first Dalit woman on the Malayalam screen. Journal of South Asian Film Studies, 7(2), 45–60.
17.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
18.
VenkatesanS., & JamesR. (2019). Reframing the subaltern: Dalit identity and counter-cinema in Papilio Buddha. South Asian Film and Media, 10(2), 123–138.
19.
YengdeS. (2018). Dalit cinema. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(3), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2018.1471848
