Rooted Identities: A Study on Tribal Human Development in Karnataka,South India

Abstract

The Scheduled Tribal communities in India today face significant underdevelopment due to policies and practices initiated during British colonialism, which began their exclusion and marginalization. The aim of the current study is to frame the first ever Human Development Index (HDI) of the tribals from the Karnataka state exclusively using primary data from 50 Scheduled Tribals. The data collected data from 1,255 tribal households focused on three basic human development indices: health, education and livelihood. This is the second effort in India after the state of Kerala in 2010. The study has provided a human development ranking both tribal- and district-wise. In the case of education, tribals such as the Yarava, Nayaka, Panniya, Meda, Malai Kudi, Gonda, Raj Gonda, Kuruba and Marathi have achieved a high level of educational status in the state. In terms of health, the Yarava, Paradi, Malaikudi, Gonda, Harni Shikar, Rajgonda, Kuruba and Takri Koli tribals have shown good health achievements. For the standard of living index, the Nayaka, Paradi, Malaikudi, Gonda, Harni Shikari, Rajgonda, Takri Koli and Kuruba have achieved a good standard of living index in Karnataka. Regarding the HDI ranking, Bangalore Rural, Kolara and Chikkaballapura districts have secured the first three places, while Hassan district is in the last position. In terms of tribal-wise human development ranking, Kuruba, Nayaka and Meda have taken the first three positions, respectively. The study concludes that despite slightly better scores than the state average in health and education, forest-based tribals are highly backward compared to their counterparts and need more urgent policy attention.

Keywords

Human development tribals health education ranking index

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aruna

(2018). Does social capital make a difference for Dalit women representatives in local self-governance? Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 10(1), 1–8.

Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Good Governance and Policy Analysis. (2018). An exploratory study to identify gaps in select sectors in tribal districts of Madhya Pradesh: Report.

Bapuji

(2003). Tribal development and administration in Andhra Pradesh—A critical study. In Vasudeva Rao

B. S.

& Sekhar

(Eds.), Evaluation studies (pp. 145–149). The Associated Publishers.

Beck

, & Mishra

B. K.

(2011). Anthropometric profile and nutritional status of selected Oraon tribals in and around Sambalpur Town, Orissa. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 9(1), 1–9.

Bharti

N. K.

(2018). Wealth inequality, class and caste in India, 1961–2012 (World working paper no. 14). https://wid.world/document/n-k-bharti-wealth-inequality-class-and-caste-in-india-1961-2012/

Datta

(2009). Disparities in human development and economic development: The case of Assam. In Rout

H. S.

& Panda

P. K.

, Human development: Dimensions and strategies (pp. 48–53). New Century Publications.

Dubey

, Thorat

, & Tiwari

(2017). Growth and poverty across states in India: The social group dimension. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 1(2), 3–29.

Fukuda

, & Shiva Kumar

A. K.

(2009). Handbook of human development concepts, measures and policies. Oxford University Press.

Ghoosh

(2016). Development programmes and the tribal: A study on the Santals of Birbhum District. Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics, 1(5), 35–39.

10.

Government of India. (2011). National human development report. Planning Commission of India.

11.

Government of India. (2014). Tribal health report. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and the Ministry of Tribal Affairs.

12.

Greyling

, & Construction

T. F.

(2017). Analysis of a composite quality of life index for a region of South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 131(3), 887–930.

13.

Human Development Report of Tribal Communities. (2010). Kerala [Unpublished Report]. Tribal Cultural Heritage in India.

14.

Jana

N. C.

, & Ghosh

P. K.

(2015). Socio-economic conditions and quality of life in the tribal areas of Orissa with special reference to Mayurbhanj district. Space and Culture, India, 3(2), 25–41.

15.

Karnataka Human Development Report. (2022). [Unpublished Report]. Center for Social Inclusion, Mysore University.

16.

Mandal

(2003). Inter-state comparisons of human development in India: An alternative measures. In Dutt

(Ed.), Human development and economic development (pp. 42–48). Deep and Deep Publication.

17.

Mishra

S. K.

(2009). A note on human development indices with income equalities, human development: dimensions and strategies. In Rout

H. S.

& Panda

P. K.

(Eds.), Human development: Dimensions and strategies (pp. 145–149). New Century Publications.

18.

Mohanty

A. K.

, Nayak

, & Chatterjee

(2009). Human development in Orissa: An inter-district analysis from the perspective of infrastructure. In Rout

H. S.

& Panda

P. K.

(Eds.), Human development: Dimensions and strategies (pp. 13–18). New Century Publications.

19.

Shah

, Vijayshankar

P. S.

, & Rural

(2022). Tribal development report: Human development and governance. Routledge India.

20.

Sreeramulu

, & Marilingappa. (2019). Tribal development in Karnataka: A study with special reference to implementation of policies and programmes. International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Economic Research, 7(2), 35–40.

21.

Vijaya

K. K.

, & Rani

S. V.

(2005). The status of development of tribals during the plan period. In Tataji

(Ed.), Five decades of development experience in India (pp. 67–71). Andhra University Press.

22.

Yadav

, & Kumar

(2019). An empirical study of determining factors of tribal household income: A case study of Tharu tribals in India. Human Social Science Studies, 28(1), 108–112.