The degraded social status of Malayali Dalit women, signified by the intersectionality of caste and gender disparities is not well recognized in Kerala so far. Dalit women writers in Kerala gained momentum with a prospectus to challenge misrepresentations and stereotyping by mainstream and Dalit men writers. Their writings criticize the caste order that demonstrates its power through symbolic forms of violence against Dalits in Kerala. This article is an attempt to understand representation and counter-representation of caste-based violence and oppression in three Malayalam short stories by Dalit women writers, Rekha Raj, Reena Sam and M. D. Dhanya. The stories are analyzed on the background of Teresa De Lauretis’s concept of the ‘rhetoric of violence’ that recognizes how the language of violence codifies and constructs objects and subjects of violence to propagate dominant ideologies. The article will also look at how the authors depict the traumatic effect produced by caste-based violence on Dalit psyche.
BoiP. (2016). Transatlantic memories of slavery: Reimagining the past, changing the future. [Review of the book Transatlantic memories of slavery: Reimagining the past, changing the future edited by Elisa Bordin and Anna Scacchi]. European Journal of American Studies. https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/11404
2.
BijukumarV. (2019). Pungent irrationality and troubled modernity in Kerala. History and Sociology of South Asia, 13(1), 19–35.
3.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Feminist Legal Theories, 1989(1), 139–167, Article 8.
4.
De LauretisT. (2014). The violence of rhetoric: Considerations on representation and gender. In ArmstrongN. & TennenhouseL. (Eds.), The violence of representation: Literature and the history of violence (pp. 239–258). Routledge.
5.
DevikaJ. (2010). Egalitarian developmentalism, communist mobilization, and the question of caste in Kerala state, India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(3), 799–820.
6.
DhanyaM. D. (2017). Our men and women. In RenukumarM. R. (Ed.), Don’t want caste: Malayalam stories by Dalit writers (pp. 148–151). Navayana.
7.
GhoshS. (2019). ‘Defying patronage to my desires!’—Women and erotic literature. Feminism in India. https://feminisminindia.com/2019/10/22/defying-patronage
8.
GuruG. (1995). Dalit women talk differently. Economic & Political Weekly, 30(41/42), 2548–2550.
9.
GuruG. (2013). Freedom of expression and the life of the Dalit mind. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(10), 39–45.
10.
GutmanY. (2017). Memory activism: Reimagining the past for the future in Israel–Palestine. Vanderbilt University Press.
11.
HigginbothamE. B. (1992). African-American women’s history and the metalanguage of race. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 17(2), 251–274.
12.
JacobT. G. (2013). The rise of lumpen bourgeoise. Frontier, 46. https://frontierweekly.com/articles/vol-46/46-13-16/46-13-16-The%20Rise%20of%20Lumpen%20Bourgeoise.html
13.
LoganW. (2000). Malabar manual (Vol. 2). Asian Educational Services [1987].
14.
MadhavanK. S. (2008). Formation of Dalit identity in Kerala. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 69, 764–770 [Indian History Congress].
15.
MadhavanK. S., & KomathR. (2023). Dalits and discourses of anti-caste movements in Kerala, India. Caste: A Global Journal on Social Exclusion, 4(2), 351–366.
16.
ManuR. M. (2009) Marginalised in a model of development: Dalit critique of the Kerala development experience [MPhil dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University], JNU’s ETD Repository. https://etd.lib.jnu.ac.in/TH17395.pdf
17.
MateerS. (1883). Native life in Travancore. W. H. Allen & Company.
18.
MathewR. G. (2016). Dalit engagement with missionaries and Syrian Christianity: A study of caste conversions and modernity in Kerala [Doctoral dissertation, EFLU], Shodhganga. https://hdl.handle.net/10603/1089
19.
MenonS. A. (1967). A survey of Kerala history. D. C. Books.
20.
MenonD. M. (2002). Religion and colonial modernity: Rethinking belief and identity. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(17), 1662–1667.
21.
NayarP. K. (2011). The politics of form in Dalit fiction: Bama’s Sangati and Sivakami’s The Grip of Change. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18(3), 365–380.
22.
PanditM. (2017). How three generations of Dalit women writers saw their identities and struggle?The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/gender/how-three-generations
23.
PichlerA. (2010). Memories of slavery: Narrating history in ritual. In ArgentiN. & SchrammK. (Eds.), Remembering violence: Anthropological perspectives on intergenerational transmission (pp. 135–164). Berghahn.
24.
PulpparambilL. (2020). Dalit feminism: Sidhanthavaum Prayogavum. Kerala Bhasha Institute.
25.
RaoA. (2003). Gender & caste (issues in contemporary Indian feminism). Zed Books Ltd.
26.
RajR. (2013). Dalit women as political agents: A Kerala experience. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(18), 56–63.
27.
RajR. (2017a). Dalit Stree Idapedalukal. D. C. Books.
28.
RajR. (2017b). Seedling. In RenukumarM. R. (Ed.), Don’t want caste: Malayalam stories by Dalit writers (pp. 104–109). Navayana.
RooksN. (1989). Writing themselves into existence: The intersection of history and literature in writings on black women. Iowa Journal of Literary Studies, 10(1), 51–63.
31.
SamR. (2017). Thorn strung eye. In RenukumarM. R. (Ed.), Don’t want caste: Malayalam stories by Dalit writers (pp. 129–133). Navayana.
32.
SekherA. (2016). Painting the call of caucal: S Joseph and the Dalit poetic tradition in Kerala. Malayalam Literary Survey, 36(3), 17–26.
33.
SheebaK. M. (2002, January). Modernity in social reform discourse: The women question in colonial Kerala. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 63, 931–938. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44158163
34.
SreekumarS. (2023). Understanding Dalit equity: A critical analysis of primary health care policy discourse of Kerala in the context of ‘Aardram’ mission. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 1–12.
35.
WestC. (1985). The dilemma of the black intellectual. Cultural Critique, 1, 109–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1354283
