This article argues that the trajectory of transgender rights, especially the quest for transgender reservations is shrouded by the spectre of Brahmanical governmentality perpetuated by the state. Through an anti-caste analysis of the recent developments in this issue, it attempts to demonstrate that the denial of horizontal reservations for trans persons by the state fulfils the conditions of Brahmanical governmentality. It is characterized by a lack of a refusal to engage with trans persons’ lived realities, ignoring trans voices about vital issues pertaining to their community and the promulgation of legal and policy decisions which inimically affect the material interests of trans persons and perpetuate their oppression.
AmbedkarB. R., & MoonV. (1979). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and speeches (Vol. 1). Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. https://www.mea.gov.in/Images/attach/amb/Volume_01.pdf
2.
Chand. (2022, January5). ‘Bengal Trans* & Queer Charter of Demands’ released | Varta Trust. Varta Trust. https://vartagensex.org/2021/03/31/bengal-trans-queer-charter-of-demands-released/
3.
ChandrachudA. (2023). These seats are reserved: Caste, quotas and the Constitution of India. Penguin Random House India Private Limited.
4.
DasS. (2023, April22). An equal stake in the nation: Why transgender people are demanding horizontal reservation. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/equal-stake-nation-transgender-people-demanding-horizontal-reservation-8570321/
5.
DattaS. (2018, November28). We refuse to be subjects of experiment for those who do not understand US: Transgender persons bill. Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.epw.in/engage/article/transgender-persons-bill-we-refuse-be-subjects-experiment-those-who-do-not-understand
6.
DuttaA. (2014). Contradictory tendencies: The Supreme Court’s NALSA judgment on transgender recognition and rights. Journal of Indian Law & Society, 5, 225.
7.
FoucaultM. (2008). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. In SenellartM. (Ed.), BurchellG. (Transl.), Foucault studies (pp. 90–100). Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
KarthikK., SuleimanG. A., & VidyaL. S. (2013, March2). (Trans)gender and caste lived experience—Transphobia as a form of Brahmanism: An interview of Living Smile Vidya. Round Table India. https://www.roundtableindia.co.in/transgender-and-caste-lived-experience-transphobia-as-a-form-of-brahminism-an-interview-of-living-smile-vidya/
9.
KhaitanT. (2014, May26). Tarunabh Khaitan: NALSA v Union of India: What Courts Say, What Courts Do. UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/04/24/tarnabh-khaitan-nalsa-vunion-of-india-what-courts-say-what-courts-do/
10.
KhannaA., & SawhneyD. (2020, December12). Nalsa judgment: Critique of the Indian perspective beyond the adams-and-eves worldview. Georgetown University Undergraduate Law Review. https://guulr.com/2020/08/25/nalsajudgment-critique-of-the-indianperspective-beyond-the-adams-andeves-worldview/
11.
KothazhamE. A. (2019). Criminal no more [Online]. The YP Foundation.
12.
LiveLaw News Network. (2023, March28). Horizontal reservation for transgender persons: Supreme court refuses to clarify NALSA judgment. LiveLaw. https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/horizontal-reservation-for-transgender-persons-supreme-court-refuses-to-clarify-nalsa-judgment-224932
13.
National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) vs Union of India. (2014). National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) vs Union of India, SCC 438.
14.
ParikhA., & MillerC. (2019). Holy cow! Beef ban, political technologies, and Brahmanical supremacy in Modi’s India. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 18(4), 835–874. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1758
15.
Rajya Sabha. (2014). The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2016/Transgender_Bill,_2015_-_PMB_passed_in_RS_2.pdf
