The Making of Two Intellectuals: Caste,Epistemology and the Question of Dissent

Abstract

Caste has an unspeakable presence in the ‘Kerala model’ development discourse. Over the years, Dalits have countered the upper-caste imagination of Kerala. The discontent with the popular imagination of Kerala started to gain momentum in the 1980s and 1990s. By then, the less privileged groups, such as women and Dalits, found reasons to contest the false promises of a modern secular society and the principles of socialist ideology. The study focuses on the intellectual engagements of two Dalit intellectuals from Kerala. K. K. Kochu and M. Kunjaman trace their epistemological framework through dissent and disagreement. Their discontent creates a rift in the hegemonic discourses produced by upper castes, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Kerala and other power structures. K. K. Kochu’s Dalithan (Dalit) and M. Kunjaman’s Ethiru (Dissent) are two autobiographical accounts that map out the intellectual life of these two prominent public figures.

Keywords

Caste Dalit intellectual epistemology dissent

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biswas

S. K.

(2008). Nine decades of Marxism in the land of Brahminism. Other Books.

Christensen

, & Lackey

(Eds.). (2013). The epistemology of disagreement: New essays. Oxford University Press.

Dasan

, Pratibha

, Pampirikunnu

, & Chandrika

C. S.

(Eds.). (2012). The Oxford India anthology of Malayalam dalit writing. Oxford University Press.

Devika

(2010). Egalitarian developmentalism, communist mobilization, and the question of caste in Kerala State, India. Journal of Asian Studies, 69(3), 799–820. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40929193.

Drake

(2005). French intellectuals and politics from the Dreyfus affair to the occupation. Palgrave Macmillan.

Fricker

, Graham

P. J.

, Henderson

, & Pedersen

N. J. L. L.

(Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of social epistemology. Routledge.

Guru

(2013). Limits of the organic intellectual: A Gramscian reading of Ambedkar. In Zene

(Ed.), The political philosophies of Antonio Gramsci and B. R. Ambedkar (pp. 87–100). essay. Routledge.

Hoare

, & Smith

G. N.

(Eds.). (1992). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.

Jeffrey

(1992). Politics, women and well-being: How Kerala became a ‘model’. Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Johnson

C. R.

(Ed.). (2018). Voicing dissent: The ethics and epistemology of making disagreement public. Routledge.

11.

Kochu

K. K.

(2019). Dalithan. DC Books.

12.

Kunjaman

(2020). Ethiru. DC Books.

13.

Menon

(1999). Being a Brahmin the Marxist way: E.M.S. Nambutiripad and the pasts of Kerala. In Ali

(Ed.), Invoking the past: The uses of history in South Asia (pp. 55–87). essay. Oxford University Press.

14.

Narake

, Kasare

M. L.

, & Kamble

N. G.

(Eds.). (2020). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and speeches (Vol. 17, 1 & 3). Dr. Ambedkar foundation.

15.

Nigam

(2000). Secularism, modernity, nation: Epistemology of the dalit critique. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(48), 4256–4268. http://jstor.org/stable/4410008

16.

Osella

, & Osella

(2000). Social mobility in Kerala: Modernity and identity in conflict, 3. Pluto Press.

17.

Ravi Raman

(2010). Development, democracy and the state: Critiquing the Kerala model of development. Routledge.

18.

Said

E. W.

(1996). Representations of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. Vintage Books.

19.

Shils

(1961). The intellectual between tradition and modernity: The Indian situation. Mouton, and Co.