Language is a prerequisite for quotidian human life. For the most part, it plays an instrumental role in defining national, ethnocultural, and caste identifications in a polyglot society like India. Language shapes our views and bestows meanings to our thoughts. However, the analysis of language’s roles, functions, and usefulness, especially in studies grappling with Dalits life in Kerala, has been considerably overlooked by vernacular Dalit scholarship. Against this backdrop, the present article attempts to delve into one of the Dalit languages in Kerala, the Parayans’ language. Drawing insights from two-year-long ethnographic fieldwork, this article sheds light upon the unfolding of Parayans’ everyday life and the process of self-identification besides explicating the ontic properties of the Parayans’ language. In a subtle manner, the article adopts the methodology of ‘linguistic turn’ and urges Dalit scholarship to attune itself to afresh conceptual orientation so that it can bring the linguistic question as the central a priori of discussions in relation to life, identification, and subjectivity of Dalit beings.
AbleyM. (2003). Spoken here, travels among threatened languages. William Heinemann.
2.
AdamsR. F. G. (1947). Obεri Ɔkaimε: A new African language and script. Africa: Journal of International African Institute, 17(1), 24–34.
3.
AppukuttanA. K. (Malayalam) (2015). Arivu, Thirivu, Thiricharivu: Parayarude Pattukal. Kerala Bhasha Institute.
4.
ArendtH. (1944). Jew as a pariah: A hidden tradition. Jewish Social Studies, 6(2), 99–122.
5.
BalakrishnanP. K. (Malayalam) (1983). Jathi Vyavasthayum Kerala Charithravum. Sahitya Pravarthaka Publishing.
6.
BasuR. S. (2011). Nandanar’s children: The Paraiyans’ tryst with destiny, Tamil Nadu, 1850–1956. Sage Publications.
7.
BhattacharyaS. (1957). Field-notes on Nahāli. Indian Linguistics. (17), 245–258.
8.
CleeveB. (1983). The secret language. Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 72(287): 252–262, 363.
9.
Constitution of India, (2022). Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice, https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI_English.pdf
10.
DamesM. L. (Trans) (2016). The book of Duarte Barbosa: An account of the centuries bordering on the Indian Ocean, Volume II. Routledge.
11.
DileepV. (2009). Communication through secret language: A case study of Parayas‗ Secret Language. Proceedings of The Third Students’ Conference of Linguistics in India organised by Centre for Linguistics at Jawaharlal Nehru University. New Delhi on 19th– 21st of February.
12.
DonahueC. J. (1937). Secret languages of Ireland. American Speech, 12(2), 142–143.
13.
EncinasG. L. (2001). Prison argot: A sociolinguistic and lexicographic study. University Press of America.
14.
FitzgeraldE. (1858). On ancient mason marks at Youghal and elsewhere: And the secret language of the craftsmen of the Middle Ages in Ireland. The Journal of the Kilkenny and South East of Ireland Archaeological Society, 2(1), 67–73.
15.
ForsterM. N. (2012). Kant’s philosophy of language. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 74(3), 485–511.
16.
ForsterM. (2007). Hermeneutics. In LeiterB. & RosenM. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of continental philosophy (pp. 1–46). Oxford University Press.
17.
From the Pariahs of Travancore. (1914). Addresses to the Diwan of Travancore with the replays of the Diwan (pp. 91–97). Government Press.
18.
GriersonG. A. (1906). (Ed.)Linguistic survey of India: Munda and Dravidian languages. Vol. IV. Office of the Superintendent Government Printing.
19.
GriersonG. A. (1922). (Ed.)Linguistic survey of India: Gypsy Languages. Vol. XI. Superintendent Government Printing.
20.
GriersonG. A. (1927). (Ed.)Linguistic survey of India: Introductory. Part. I & Vol. I. Government of India Central Publication Branch.
21.
GumperzJ. J. (1958). Dialect differences and social stratification in a North Indian village. American Anthropologist, 60(4), 668–682.
22.
GundertH. (1871). A Malayalam and English, dictionary (Introduction). C Stolz.
23.
GuptaD. (2000). Interrogating caste: Understanding hierarchy and difference in Indian society. Penguin Books.
24.
GuruG. & SarukkaiS. (2012). The cracked mirror: An Indian debate on experience and theory. Oxford University Press.
25.
HamzićV. (2014). The (Un) conscious Pariah: Canine and gender outcastes of British Raj. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 40(2), 185–198.
26.
IyerK. L. A. (1941). Travancore tribes and castes: The aborigines of Travancore, Volume III. Government Press.
27.
KrishnankuttyO. (Malayalam) (2018). Parayar: Kulam, Gothram, Samoohikajivitham, Kerala Bhasha Institute.
28.
KuiperF. B. J. (1962). Nahali: A comparative study. Noord Hollandsche Uitgeversmatschappij.
29.
KuiperF. B. J. (1966). The sources of the Nahali vocabulary. In ZideN. H. (Ed.) Studies in comparative Austro-Asiatic linguistics (pp. 57–81). Mouton & Co.
30.
Mouton de Gruyter. Lafont, Cristina. (1999). Linguistic turn in hermeneutic philosophy. MIT Press.
31.
MacAlisterS. R. A. (1937). The secret languages of Ireland: With special reference to the origin and nature of the Shelta language. The University Press.
32.
MateerS. (1871). The land of charity: A descriptive account of Travancore and its people. John Snow & Co.
33.
MateerS. (1884). The Pariah caste in Travancore,Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland.16(2), 180–195.
34.
MaurerD. W. (1944). Australian‗ Rhyming Argot in the American Underworld. American Speech, 19(3), 183–195.
35.
McGilvrayD. B. (1983). Paraiyar drummers of Sri Lanka: Consensus and constraint in an untouchable caste. American Ethnologist, 10(1), 97–115.
36.
MelikianG. (2002). On the problem of secret languages and slangs in Iran. Iran & Caucasus, 6(1/2), 181–188.
37.
MehrotraR. R. (1977). Sociology of Secret Language. Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
38.
MohanS. (2005). Imagining equality: Modernity and social transformation of lower castes in colonial Kerala. PhD Thesis. Mahatma Gandhi University.
39.
MohanS. (2006). Narrativising oppression and suffering: Theorising slavery. South Asia Research, 26(1), 5–40.
40.
MohanS. (2016a). Social space, civil society and Dalit agency in twentieth-century Kerala. In RawatR. S. & SatyanarayanaK. (Eds.) Dalit Studies (pp. 74–103). Duke University Press.
41.
MohanS. (2016b). Creation of social space through prayers among Dalits in Kerala, India. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 2(1), 40–57.
42.
NorenS. J. (1962). Kant and language. MA Thesis. University of Massachusetts.
43.
O’GradyG. N. (1956). A secret language of Western Australia—A note. Oceania, 27(2), 158–159.
44.
PrakasamV. (1999). Semiotics of language, literature and culture. Allied Publishers.
45.
SadeqpurA. (2009). Notes on the secret language of house builders in Ābāde. Iran and the Caucasus, 13(1), 135–139.
46.
SanalM. P. (2015). Modernity of slavery: Struggles against caste inequality in colonial Kerala. Oxford University Press.
47.
SeizerS. (2005). Stigmas of the Tamil stage: An ethnography of special drama artists in South India. Duke University Press.
48.
SinclairA. T. (1909). The secret language of masons and tinkers. The Journal of American Folklore, 22(86), 353–364.
49.
SmithC. P. (1979). Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and ordinary language philosophy. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review. 43(2), 296–321.
50.
SrinivasM. N. (1952). Religion and society among Coorgs of Southern India. Clarendon Press.
51.
ThurstonE. (1909). Cates and tribes of South India. Government Press.
52.
UnderhillJ. W. (2009): Humboldt, worldview and language, Edinburgh University Press.
53.
VarikasE. (2010). The outcasts of the world—Images of the Pariahs. Estudos Avancados, 24(69), 31–60.
54.
ViswanathR. (2014). The Pariah problem: Caste, religion and the social in modern India. Columbia University Press.
