Contextualizing Identity and Exclusion and the Unheard Voices of Kolkata’s Migrant Hand-rickshaw-pullers

Abstract

The intrigues of global capital are certain to drive out thousands of atrociously marginalized Dalit and Muslim hand-rickshaw-pullers from their livelihood in Kolkata (previously Calcutta) on the ground that not only are hand-rickshaws outdated, but their plying on the city-roads is an indication of retrogression as well as antithetical to development while global capital needs fast-paced smart-cities, supportive to unhindered capitalist development. In line with such exclusionary course of action, the State intends to rule out their continuance which would evict those marginal people from their livelihood. But this is utterly in contrast with the policy of inclusive growth. The plan is likely to play havoc with their livelihood since most of the pullers, belonging to the Hindi-and Urdu-speaking Dalit and Muslim groups are unskilled and old-aged. How would they survive when the government imposes overall ban on the hand-rickshaws, only to be replaced by motorized vehicles. Amidst the controversies, the vulnerable rickshaw-pullers meekly raise their voice of protest. But their voice fails to reach the portals of power.

Keywords

Global capital Dalit Muslim smart-city right to the city traffic-congestion unwanted oral expression political society counter-hegemonic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alam

(2004). Who wants democracy (p. 126). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

Baxi

(2011). Philosophical reading of the right to the city. In Faetenini

(Ed.). Urban policies and the right to the city in India: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship (p. 18). United Nations Scientific, Educational and Cultural Organization. Retrieved 22 December 2016, from www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002146/21462epdf

Bhagat

R. B.

(2011). Migrants (denied) the right to the city. In Faetenini

(Ed.). Urban policies and the right to the city in India: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship (p. 53). United Nations Scientific, Educational and Cultural Organisation. Retrieved 23 December 2016, from www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002146/21462epdf

Castells

(1978). City, class and power (p. 3). London: Macmillan.

Chatterjee

(2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world (pp. 64–78). New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Debolina

& Dibyendu

(2011). Redefining the inclusive urban agenda in India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI(5), 55–63.

De Souza

M. L.

(2015). From the ‘right to the city’ to the right to the planet: Reinterpreting our contemporary challenges for socio-spatial development. City, 19(4), 409–412.

Elliot

C. M.

(Ed.). (2003). Civil society and democracy: A reader (p. 11). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ghose

(1960, August 13). The colonial beginnings of Calcutta: Urbanisation without industrialisation. The Economic Weekly, 1255. Retrieved 28 November 2016, from www.epw.in/.../1960.../the_colonial_beginnings_of_calcuttaurbanisation_without_ind

10.

Gudavarthy

& Vijay

(2007). Antinomies of political society: Implications of uncivil development. Economic and Political Weekly, XLII(29), 3052–3059.

11.

Harvey

(2008). The right to the city (pp. 7, 13, 14). Retrieved 2 November 2016, from hdavidharvey.org/media/righttothecity.pdf

12.

Lefebvre

(1996). Writings on city (p. 65, Kofman

& Lebas

Trans. and Eds). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

13.

Mehra

(2011). Urban spatial exclusion: A historical perspective. In Faetenini

(Ed.), Urban policies and the right to the city in India: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship (p. 61). Retrieved 22 December 2016, from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002146/21462epdf

14.

Ong

W. J.

(1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.

15.

Scott

J. C.

(1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Sen

(1996). The left front and the unintended city: Is a civilised transition possible. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXI(45–46), 2971–2982.