Enquiring into social exclusion in operationalization of global models of participatory development, this article makes an exclusive attempt to analyze Dalit women’s access to canal water and exclusion in Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM). Applying Agarwal’s model of participatory exclusions, qualitative and quantitative data of this research reveal that developmental interventions also largely prove to foster social oppression and latent social exclusion in the case of Dalit women as these interventions are not adequately designed to alleviate the deprivation of the marginalized communities on the pretext of institutional efficiency. Consequently, reproduction of caste–class–gender inequalities in user groups and hydraulic networks largely and severally marginalizing Dalit women at all levels of Panipanchayats to a greater extent, engender and perpetuate preclusion of Dalit women in PIM.
AgarwalB. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29, 1623–1648.
2.
AppaduraiArjun. (1988). Putting hierarchy in its place: Place and voice in anthropological theory. Cultural Anthropology, 3(1), 36–39.
3.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2008). Irrigation management transfer: Strategies and best practices. New Delhi: SAGE.
4.
CarlosG. R., DouglasV., & GiovanniM. (2007). Irrigation management transfer: Worldwide efforts and results. Rome: FAO.
5.
ChowdhryPrem. (2010). Gender discrimination in land ownership (p. 314). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
6.
CornwallA., HarrisonE. & WhiteheadA.2004. Introduction: Repositioning feminisms in development. IDS Bulletin (special issue Repositioning Feminisms in Gender and Development), 35(4): 1–10.
7.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2007). Gender and water, securing water for improved rural livelihoods: The multiple-uses system approach, Rome, Italy.
8.
IrudayamAloysius S. J., MangubhaiJayshree P., & LeeJoel G. (2006). Dalit women speak out violence against Dalit women in India. New Delhi: National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights.
9.
JacksonCecile, & PearsonRuth. (1998). Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy. London: Routledge.
10.
KulkarniSeema. (2011). Women and decentralised water governance: Issues, challenges and the way forward. Economic & Political Weekly, xlvi(18), 64–72.
11.
KulkarniS., AhmedS., DatarC., BhatS., MathurY., & MakhwanaD. (2008). Final report of the study titled Water rights as women’s rights?Assessing the scope for women’s empowerment through decentralised water governance in Maharashtra and Gujarat (Research Report 102927). Society for Promoting Participative Eco-system Management (SOPPECOM), Pune, IN.
12.
KulkarniSuresh A., & TyagiAvinash C. (2012). ‘PIM: Understanding the role of cooperative culture. New Delhi: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage.
13.
MajumdarD. N. (1955). Rural profiles. Lucknow: Ethnographic and Folk Culture Society.
14.
Meinzen-DickRuth, & ZwarteveenMargreet. (2001). Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia. Agriculture and Human Values, 18(1), 11–25.
15.
MenonNivedita. (2009). Sexuality, caste, governmentality: Contests over ‘gender’ in India. Feminist Review, 91, 94–112. doi: 10.1057/fr.2008.46.
16.
MunozG., Garces-RestrepoC., VermillionD. L., RenaultD., & SamadM. (2007, May2–5). Irrigation management transfer: Worldwide efforts and results. Paper presented at the 4th Asian Regional Conference & 10th International Seminar on Participatory Irrigation Management, Tehran, Iran.
17.
NWP. (2012). National water policy. Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources. Retrieved 13September2014, from https://www.google.co.in/search?q=national+water+policy++2002&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=Pn_cVa__IsaouwTtiZ7QCg#q=national+water+policy+2012
18.
OomenBarbara. (2011). Small places: The homecoming of human rights in the Netherlands. Inaugural Lecture as Utrecht University Chair in the Sociology of Human Rights, Middelburg.
19.
PantN. (2005). Control and access to groundwater in UP. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(26), 2672–2680.
20.
PrakashAnjal, & SamaR. K. (2006, February18). Contending water uses: Social undercurrents in water scarce village. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(7), 577–579.
21.
RegeSharmila. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of ‘difference’ and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), 39–46.
22.
RegeSharmila. (2000). Real feminism’ and Dalit women, scripts of denial and accusation. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(6), 492–495.
23.
ShahT. (1993). Groundwater markets and irrigation development: Political economy and practical policy. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
24.
TomarR. (2013). Dalit feminism: A transformation of rejection into resistance. The Criterion, 12, 1–8.
25.
Van KoppenB., MoriartyP., & BoeleeE.. (2006). Multiple-Use Water Services to Advance the Millennium Development Goals: (Research Report 98). International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
