The study examined how Christians of Dalit origin describe the experience of social dominance while engaging with socio-religious and school milieus, using a qualitative phenomenological enquiry. I purposively selected 30 Dalit Christians for in-depth interviews, from ‘Thachoor’ village in Tamil Nadu with history of violence against Dalit Christians in the recent past. All interviews were audio-taped, transcribed in Tamil and later translated into English. Data were analyzed using narrative thematic analysis. Findings reveal that interactional milieu (viz., social, religious and school milieus) characterized through social dominance of the higher castes. Dalit Christians’ responses included social dominance acceptance, dominance neutral and dominance challenge. High castes strategize social dominance through social distance, conflicts and deprivation of Dalits from help to maintain fear in collective Dalit memory. Collective internalizations of fear seemed to relate with psychosocial disability and social exclusion. The study concludes that high castes considerably exercise social dominance that substantially contribute to compromised agency and increased social exclusion.
AlexanderK.C. (1977). The problem of caste in Christian churches of Kerala. In HarindraH. Singh (Ed.), Caste among non-Hindus in India (p. 54). New Delhi: National Publishing House.
2.
BailyF.G. (1957). Caste and economic frontier. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3.
BoydR.H.S. (1991). An introduction to Indian Christian theology. Delhi: ISPCK.
4.
BrinkH., Van der WaltC., & Van RensburgG. (2006). Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Company Ltd.
5.
BuggeH. (1994). Mission and Tamil society: Social and religious change in south India (1840–1900).
6.
Census (2011). Government of India, New Delhi.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications.
8.
Chidambaram Committee. (1975). Evaluation report on intensive agricultural area programme.Chennai: Government of Tamil Nadu.
9.
CreswellJ.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
10.
CreswellJ.W. (2003). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
11.
CreswellJ.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
CurtisS., GeslerW., SmithG., & WashburnS. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health.Social Science and Medical, 50(2), 1001–1014.
13.
DenzinN.K., & LincolnS.Y. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
14.
De VosA.S. (1998). Research at grass root.Academic: J.L. van Schaik.
15.
De VosA.S., StrydomH., FouchéC.B., & DelportC.S.L. (2005). Research at grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed.). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
16.
DumontL. (1970). Homo Hierarchicus, the caste system and its implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FoucheG.E.Jr (1980). U.S. Patent No. 4,187,332. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Tradem.
18.
HarriesM. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction.Annual Review of Anthropology, 5(1), 329–350.
19.
HubermanA.M., & MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN.K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
20.
Integral Liberation (1998). Retrieved from http:///www.holycrossjustice.org/regionalupdates/Asia/IntegralLiberation.asp
21.
JoseJ.P. (2014). Women with non-dominant identities in India: Validation of a psychosocial model of social exclusion. Doctoral dissertation submitted to Pondicherry University, Puducherry.
22.
JoseJ.P., CherayiS., & SadathA. (2014). Does caste matter for social disability of Dalit women? Evidence from rural Tamilnadu.Voice of Dalits, 7(1), 105–120.
23.
JoseJ.P., & VargheseV.C (2014). Sexual identity and psychosocial disabilities of transgender women in India: A social exclusion perspective.Voice of Dalit, 7(1), 95–104.
24.
JoseJ.P, VargheseV.C. & SabuK.U. (2014). Tribal unwed motherhood in South India: The causes, process and consequences in perspective. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM publishers.
25.
JoseJ.P., VargheseV.C., & SultanaA.S. (2013). Is Dalit identity a cause or an effect of social marginalization? An empirically informed discussion.Voice of Dalits, 6(2), 159–180.
26.
Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1955). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalelkar_Commission
27.
KananaikalJ. (1986). Scheduled castes in search of justice. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
28.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness.American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.
29.
Kumaran Pillai Commission Report (1965). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/banglamissions/home/8-p-paggi/documenti/caste-and-untouchability/unchristian-things-in-the-indian-church
MalikS.K. (2014). Dalit identity: The hermeneutical understanding and an epistemological alternative worldview.Voice of Dalits, 7(1), 45–60.
32.
Mandal Commission Report (1980). Reservations for backward classes. New Delhi: Akaland Publications.
33.
MandelbaumD.G. (1970). Society in India. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
34.
MarshallC., & RossmanG.B. (1999). The ‘what’ of the study: Building the conceptual framework.Designing Qualitative Research, 3, 21–54.
35.
MasonM. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews.Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.
36.
MasseyJ. (1995). Dalits in India: Religion as a source of bondage or liberation with special reference to Dalit Christians. New Delhi: Manohar.
37.
MIDS (2003). Evaluation of the ten point programme for the development of Dalit Christians in Tamilnadu. Chennai: Madras Institute of Development Studies.
38.
MillerW.L., & CrabtreeB.F. (1999). The dance of interpretation.Doing qualitative research, 2, 127–143.
39.
MorseJ.M. (1999). Qualitative generalizability.Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 5–6.
40.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
41.
MoutonJ. (1996). Understanding social research. Van Schaik Publishers.
42.
PeacockJ.L. (1986). The anthropological lens: Harsh light.Soft Focus, 4, 54–55.
43.
PillaiT.G. (1965). Annelida polychaeta from the Philippines and Indonesia.Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological science)5(2), 110–177.
44.
PrattoF., SidaniusJ., StallworthL.M., & MalleB.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
45.
PrattoF., StallworthL., SidaniusJ., & SiersB. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 37–53.
46.
RacineJ.L., & RacineJ. (1998). Dalit identities and the dialectics of oppression and emancipation in a changing India: The Tamil Case and Beyond.Comparative Studies on South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 18(1), 5–19.
47.
RajA. (2001). Social impact of conversion: A comparative sociological study of Christians of scheduled caste origin and scheduled caste Hindus. New Delhi: Indian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
48.
Raj.A. (1992). Betraying the hope of the poor (pp. 10–11). Madurai: DCLM Publications.
49.
RossmanG.B. & RallisS.F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
50.
RubinH., & RubinI. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
ShahG. (2014). Dalit identity and politics. In ShahG. (Ed) Cultural sub-ordination and the dalit challenge (vol. 2, p. 22). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
53.
SrinivasM.N. (1987). The dominant castes and other essays. India: Oxford University Press.
54.
TNBC Commission Report (2000). TNBC Commission for S/C and S/T, Trichy.
55.
VargheseV.C. (2012a). Socio-economic and cultural conditions of Dalit Christians: A case study of Trichy and Chengalpattu of Tamilnadu. PhD thesis submitted to Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi.
56.
VargheseV.C. (2012b). Dalit and tribal life in India: Understanding social exclusion. Lambert Academic Publishing: Germany.
57.
ZelliotE. (2001). The meaning of Ambedkar.Dalit Identity and Politics: Cultural Subordination and the Dalit Challenge, 2, 129–142.
