India left aside the economic philosophy of the import-substitution-led growth model in 1991, and increasingly integrated itself with the world economy.1
The views expressed by the authors are personal and in no way represent the same of their respective institutes.
While the country’s GDP growth is commendable in global comparison, devolution of actual development at the state level is a relevant research question. It is argued that India’s poor growth prospect in recent times is a result of the counterproductive policies adopted over the last decade, particularly since 2009. The present analysis contributes to this debate by exploring two key questions. First, it enquires how the government’s social sector policies, measured by inflation-adjusted average per capita social sector expenditure (PCSSE) and per capita grants-in-aid disbursement (PCGAD), contribute to economic development, as reflected through inflation and inequality-adjusted monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE), across various states over the last two decades. Second, the paper also attempts to explain the influence of development dynamics, as reflected through growth in MPCE, on general election outcomes. The analysis indicates that government policies in the social sector influence the development process, which in turn may affect general election outcomes. Given these findings, it is argued that there is room for introspection on recent restructuring of centre–state financial devolutions.
AshtekarS. (2008). The National Rural Health Mission: A stocktaking. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(37), 23–26.
2.
BajpaiN. (2002). A decade of economic reforms in India: The unfinished agenda. Center for International Development Working Paper No. 89, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
3.
BalajiS.J.PalS. (2014). Is there regional convergence? Agricultural Productivity Growth, 49(52), 74–80.
4.
BasoleA.BasuD. (2015). Non-food expenditures and consumption inequality in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(36), 43–53.
5.
BhandariL.KhareA. (2002). The geography of post-1991 Indian economy. Global Business Review, 3(2), 321–340.
6.
ChadhaG.K.SahuP. (2002). Post-reform setbacks in rural employment. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(21), 1998–2026.
7.
ChakrabortyP.GuptaM. (2016). Evolving centre–state financial relations: Role of the new framework for grants. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(16), 43–46.
8.
CoudouelA.DaniA.A.PaternostroS. (Eds) (2006). Poverty and social impact analysis of reforms: Lessons and examples from implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
9.
DashB.B.MukherjeeS. (2015). Political competition and human development: Evidence from the Indian states. Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 1–14.
10.
DeatonA.DrezeJ. (2002). Poverty and inequality in India: A re-examination. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(33), 3729–3748.
11.
EckausR.S. (1967). Planning in India. In M.Millikan, Economic planning (pp. 305–378). NBER, New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Government of India (GoI). (2002). National human development report 2001. New Delhi: Planning Commission.
13.
Government of India (GoI). (2009). Report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty. New Delhi: Planning Commission.
14.
Government of India (GoI). (2012). Press note on poverty estimates, 2009–10. New Delhi: Planning Commission.
15.
Government of India (GoI). (2013). Press note on poverty estimates 2011–12.New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
Government of India (GoI)
(2016). Union budget documents 2016–17. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.
18.
KheraR. (2006). Mid-day meals in primary schools: Achievements and challenges. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(46), 4742–4750.
19.
MohanN.C. (2014). Unemployment in an era of jobless growth. Working Paper No. 159, New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
20.
MorrisS.BasantR. (2006). Small and medium enterprise in India today: Observing policy constraints to achieving rapid growth in a globalizing economy. Working Paper No. 2006-07-03, Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
21.
MukherjeeS. (2017). Changing Tax Capacity and Tax Effort of Indian States in the Era of High Economic Growth 2001–2014. NIPFP Working Paper No. 196. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP).
22.
MukherjeeS.ChakrabortyD. (2011). Is there any interdependence between economic growth and human development? Evidence from Indian States. Indian Journal of Human Development, 5(2), 467–494.
23.
NITIAayog. (2015). Report of the sub-group of chief ministers on rationalisation of centrally sponsored schemes. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India.
24.
PanagariyaA. (2016 May 4). Miracle growth will return: The Modi government has been battling a flawed inheritance in its first two years. >The Times of India, New Delhi.
25.
PapolaT.S. (2012). Structural changes in the Indian economy: Emerging patterns and implications. Working Paper No. 2012/02, New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
26.
RanawareK.DasU.KulkarniA.NarayananS. (2015). MGNREGA works and their impacts: A study of Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(13), 53–61.
27.
SainiS.GulatiA. (2015). The National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013—Challenges, buffer stocking and the way forward. Working Paper No. 297, New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
28.
SaxenaN.C. (2000). How have the poor done? Mid-term review of ninth plan. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(41), 3627–3630.
29.
SenA. (2000). Estimates of consumer expenditure and its distribution: Statistical priorities after NSS 55th Round. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(51), 4499–4518.
30.
SharmaV.P. (2011). India’s agricultural development under the new economic regime: Policy perspective and strategy for the 12th five year plan. Working Paper No. 2011-11-01, Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
31.
SidhuH.S. (2002). Crisis in agrarian economy in Punjab: Some urgent steps. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(30), 3132–3138.
32.
SugdenJ. (2016 January 8). India leads World Bank growth forecast amid global economic heavy weather. The Wall Street Journal, New York.
33.
SundaramK. (2001). Employment-unemployment situation in nineties: Some results from NSS 55th Round Survey. Economic & Political Weekly, 36(11), 931–940.
34.
TilakJ.B.G (2007). Inclusive growth and education: On the approach to the eleventh plan. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(38), 3872–3877.
35.
VaidyaC. (2009). Urban issues, reforms and way forward in India. Working Paper No. 4/2009-DEA, New Delhi: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
36.
WilsonD.PurushothamanR. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050. Global Economics Paper No: 99, New York: Goldman Sachs.
37.
World Bank (n.d.). World development indicators. Retrieved 12 March 2016, from data.worldbank.org/indicator