Assessing the Poverty Impact of India’s Largest Livelihood Security Programme: A Study Based on 68th Round of NSSO

Abstract

The enactment of India’s historic livelihood guarantee programme in the form of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) has been coterminous with a phase of rapid decline in India’s rural poverty rates. This naturally motivates the question as to whether the observed decline in rural poverty can be attributed, at least partly, to efficient targeting and implementation of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MNREGS). This study underscores the fact that the welfare impact of anti-poverty programmes such as the MNREGS is critically dependent on whether these programmes actually reach the intended beneficiaries. Using the unit-level data from the 68th round of the NSSO survey on Employment and Unemployment, the article first investigates the possible ‘capture’ of the MNREGS at the national and also at the state levels and the consequent ‘crowding out’ of asset poor rural households. Statistical analysis of household data reveals that although at the national level, the scheme seems to be predominantly directed towards the poor, considerable variations exist among states. After correcting for confounders in treatment and control groups, the study finds that access to MNREGS employment significantly lowers the probability of a rural household of falling in the poverty trap. The article, therefore, concludes that the scheme has the potential of favourably impacting and protecting consumption standards among rural poor. Maximisation of this potential, however, would depend upon proper identification of needy households and rooting out of the pseudo-poor from the ambit of the programme.

Keywords

MNREGS targeting rural poverty CBPS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhatia

Dreze

(2006). Employment guarantee in Jharkhand: Ground realities. Economic and Political Weekly , 41(29), 3198–3202.

Bhatti

(2012). Aadhar enabled payments for NREA workers. Economic and Political Weekly , 47(49), 16–19.

Dewan

Somanathan

(2004). Poverty targeting in public programmes: A comparison of alternative nonparametric methods (Discussion Paper 4–16). New Delhi: Indian Statistical Institute.

Fong

Ratkovic

Imai

(2014). CBPS: R package for covariate balancing propensity score . Retrieved from CRAN http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CBPS/index.html

Ghaia

Imai

Kaushik

P. D.

(2001). On the targeting and cost effectiveness of anti-poverty programmes in rural India. Development and Change , 32(2), 309–342.

Government of India. (2013). Press notes on poverty estimates 2011–12 . New Delhi: Planning Commission.

Imai

Ratkovic

(2014). Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology) , 76(1), 243–246.

Jha

Bhattacharyya

Gaiha

Shankar

(2009). Capture of anti-poverty programs: An analysis of national employment guarantee program in India. Journal of Asian Economics , 20(4), 456–464.

Jha

Gaiha

Shankar

Pandey

M.K.

(2013). Targeting accuracy of the NREG: Evidence from Madhya Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. The European Journal of Development Research , 25(5), 758–777.

10.

Malla

M.A.

(2014). NREGA in Kashmir: Opportunity for social protection derailed. Economic and Political Weekly , 49(52), 109–114.

11.

Ranaware

Das

Kulkarni

Narayanan

(2015). MNREGA works and their impacts. Economic and Political Weekly , 50(1), 53–61.

12.

Rosebaum

P.R.

Rubin

(1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician , 39(1), 33–38.