The household electricity consumption (HEC) directly contributes to energy demand and carbon emissions that are crucial in mitigating climate changes. This study applied linear regression and machine-learning models to examine the associations between HEC and green space attributes, individual and household characteristics, and user satisfaction. The city of Xi’an, China, was selected to collect data by residents’ survey and spatial analysis. The linear model results showed that key factors were mainly related to individual and household characteristics, as well as satisfaction with green spaces. In contrast, the random forest model revealed threshold effects, indicating that keeping the distance to the nearest green space within 1,200 m and providing at least four green spaces within a 1 km radius can effectively promote outdoor visits and reduce HEC. The analysis of dual-factor interactions revealed that simultaneously enhancing both accessibility and landscape quality of nearby green spaces represents an effective pathway for reducing HEC. These findings not only elucidate the mechanisms linking green space accessibility and HEC, but also provide quantitative guidance and actionable thresholds for optimizing the spatial configuration, accessibility, and service efficiency of urban green spaces. This study contributes practical guidance on embedding energy-saving and carbon-reduction strategies within green space system planning, advancing the transition toward sustainable and climate-responsive urban development.
BansalPQuanSJ (2024) Examining temporally varying nonlinear effects of urban form on urban heat island using explainable machine learning: a case of Seoul. Building and Environment247: 110957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110957
4.
CaoJTaoT (2023) Using machine-learning models to understand nonlinear relationships between land use and travel. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment123: 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103930
5.
ChenHTZhangBLiuH, et al. (2024) The inequality in household electricity consumption due to temperature change: data driven analysis with a function-on-function linear model. Energy288: 129742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129742
6.
FengXZhouQLuD, et al. (2024) Does increasing income have a positive impact on energy consumption? New evidence from China. Sustainable Futures7: 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100139
7.
HaoPYinSMWangD, et al. (2023) Exploring the influencing factors of urban residential electricity consumption in China. Energy for Sustainable Development72: 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.12.015
8.
HoedemaekersC (2021) ‘selling themselves’: conceptualizing key features of freelance work experience. Culture and Organization27: 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2020.1833206
9.
HortaHLiH (2023) Nothing but publishing: the overriding goal of PhD students in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Studies in Higher Education48: 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764
10.
HouCZhangMZhaoX, et al. (2022) The neural mechanism of food waste behavior in Chinese households from the perspective of gender differences. Journal of Natural Resources37: 2531–2543. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20221005
11.
JoHKimH (2022) Analyzing electricity consumption factors of buildings in Seoul, Korea using multiscale geographically weighted regression. Buildings12(5): 678.
12.
KaraaslanKKesrikliogluEOktayE (2024) Determination of household electricity expenditures using quantile regression with kennedy approach. Energy Efficiency17(4): 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-024-10204-1
13.
KeJCShengNSongQB, et al. (2024) Empirical evidence on the characteristics and influencing factors of carbon emissions from household appliances operation in the pearl River Delta region, China. Applied Energy376: 124191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124191
14.
KimM (2020) Determining the relationship between residential electricity consumption and factors: case of Seoul. Sustainability12(20): 8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208590
15.
KimYKimY (2022) Explainable heat-related mortality with random forest and SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) models. Sustainable Cities and Society79: 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103677
16.
KimSLeeS (2023) Nonlinear relationships and interaction effects of an urban environment on crime incidence: application of urban big data and an interpretable machine learning method. Sustainable Cities and Society91: 104419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104419
17.
KoHSonY (2018) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: a case study in gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecological Indicators91: 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.006
18.
KrishnamurthyCKriströmB (2015) A cross-country analysis of residential electricity demand in 11 OECD-Countries. Resource and Energy Economics39: 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.12.002
19.
KuangBSchellyCOuG, et al. (2023) Data-driven analysis of influential factors on residential energy end-use in the US. Journal of Building Engineering75: 106947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106947
20.
LeeSHHarryKHoLJ (2021) The analysis of urban park catchment areas-perspectives from quality service of Hangang park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture49: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2021.49.6.027
21.
LeeJKimDParkJ (2022) A machine learning and computer vision study of the environmental characteristics of streetscapes that affect pedestrian satisfaction. Sustainability14(9): 5730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095730
22.
LiZYZhouLHongXQ, et al. (2024) Outdoor thermal comfort and activities in urban parks: an experiment study in humid subtropical climates. Building and Environment253: 111361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111361
23.
LiuYWangRYGrekousisG, et al. (2019) Neighbourhood greenness and mental wellbeing in Guangzhou, China: what are the pathways?Landscape and Urban Planning190: 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103602
24.
LiuWZuoBQuC, et al. (2022) A reasonable distribution of natural landscape: utilizing green space and water bodies to reduce residential building carbon emissions. Energy and Buildings267: 112150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112150
25.
LundbergSMLeeSI (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Long Beach, CA.
26.
MallerCTownsendMSt LegerL, et al. (2009) Healthy parks, healthy people: the health benefits of contact with nature in a park context. George Wright Forum26(2): 51–83.
27.
Pais-MagalhaesVMoutinhoVRobainaM (2020) Determinants of the household electricity consumption efficiency of an ageing population: evidence for the EU-28. Energy Reports6: 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.193
28.
PuZNFeiJH (2022) The impact of digital finance on residential carbon emissions: evidence from China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics63: 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.07.006
29.
ShenBWZhangSJ (2022) Determinants of workplace choice: how important is the city's ecological environment in attracting jobseekers in China. Sustainability14(5): 2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052624
30.
SongX-HChoT-DLangX-X, et al. (2013) Influencing the willingness to pay for urban park service functions. Journal of Environmental Science International22: 1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.5322/jesi.2013.22.10.1279
31.
SunXLiuX (2023) Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban carbon emission efficiency in China: based on heterogeneous spatial stochastic frontier model. Geographical Research42: 3182–3201.
TerefeAEHouYT (2024) Determinants influencing the accessibility and use of urban green spaces: a review of empirical evidence. City and Environment Interactions24: 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2024.100159
34.
TselepisTNieuwenhuizenC (2023) Frugal innovations of South African female social entrepreneurs. African Journal of Science Technology Innovation & Development15: 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2023.2177016
35.
WangBWangXMGuoDX, et al. (2018) Analysis of factors influencing residents' habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: egoism or altruism?Energy Policy116: 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.055
36.
WangJYZhuJLDingZK, et al. (2019) Typical energy-related behaviors and gender difference for cooling energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production238: 117846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117846
37.
WangBYuanZYLiuXX, et al. (2021) Electricity price and habits: which would affect household electricity consumption?Energy and Buildings240: 110888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110888
38.
WangJWeiJZhangW, et al. (2022) High-resolution temporal and spatial evolution of carbon emissions from building operations in beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production376: 134272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134272
39.
WangGDNiuJQQinHQ, et al. (2023) Visiting green spaces can reduce considerable carbon emissions during summer: evidence from Chongqing, China. Energy and Buildings301: 113686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113686
40.
WangYPHuLHouLC, et al. (2024) A SHAP machine learning-based study of factors influencing urban residents’ electricity consumption-evidence from Chinese provincial data. Environment, Development and Sustainability26(12): 30445–30476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05263-4
41.
WartmannFMFrickJKienastF, et al. (2021) Factors influencing visual landscape quality perceived by the public. Results from a national survey. Landscape and Urban Planning208: 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104024
42.
WiesmannDAzevedoILFerraoP, et al. (2011) Residential electricity consumption in Portugal: findings from top-down and bottom-up models. Energy Policy39: 2772–2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.047
43.
WojcikS (2019) The determinants of travel mode choice: the case of Lodz, Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series44: 93–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0018
44.
WongLTFongKNKMuiKW, et al. (2009) A field survey of the expected desirable thermal environment for older people. Indoor and Built Environment18: 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x09337044
45.
XuQZhongMR (2023) The impact of income inequity on energy consumption: the moderating role of digitalization. Journal of Environmental Management325: 116464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116464
46.
XuXXXiaoBLiCZ (2020) Critical factors of electricity consumption in residential buildings: an analysis from the point of occupant characteristics view. Journal of Cleaner Production256: 120423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120423
47.
XuRZLiYLuoYT, et al. (2023) Prediction and evaluation of indirect carbon emission from electrical consumption in multiple full-scale wastewater treatment plants via automated machine learning-based analysis. ACS ES&T Engineering3: 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00306
48.
XuSNYuanSYLiJZ, et al. (2024a) Urban park green space use analysis based on trajectory big data: experience from a medium-sized city in China. Heliyon10(4): e26445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26445
49.
XuSTChenMLYuanBF, et al. (2024b) Resident satisfaction and influencing factors of the renewal of old communities. Journal of Urban Planning and Development150(1): 04023061. https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4632
50.
YalcintasMKayaA (2017) Roles of income, price and household size on residential electricity consumption: comparison of Hawaii with similar climate zone states. Energy Reports3: 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.07.002
51.
YeHQiuQYZhangGQ, et al. (2013) Effects of natural environment on urban household energy usage carbon emissions. Energy and Buildings65: 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.001
52.
YinCYShaoCF (2021) Revisiting commuting, built environment and happiness: new evidence on a nonlinear relationship. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment100: 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103043
53.
YinCCaoJSunBD (2020) Examining non-linear associations between population density and waist-hip ratio: an application of gradient boosting decision trees. Cities107: 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102899
54.
ZhaiYJWuHBFanHC, et al. (2018) Using mobile signaling data to exam urban park service radius in Shanghai: methods and limitations. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems71: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.03.011
55.
ZhangXLXiongJBSongJQ (2022) Forecast of China's annual carbon emissions based on two-stage model. Frontiers in Environmental Science10: 895648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.895648
56.
ZhangWWPanSLiZY, et al. (2023) The nonlinear relationship between air quality and housing prices by machine learning. Environmental Science and Pollution Research30: 114375–114390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30123-5
57.
ZhaoSJSongQBWangC (2019) Characterizing the energy-saving behaviors, attitudes and awareness of university students in Macau. Sustainability11(22): 6341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226341
58.
ZhaoWDZhangLWLiXP, et al. (2022) Residents' preference for urban green space types and their ecological-social services in China. Land11(12): 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122239
59.
ZhaoDCaiJXuYM, et al. (2023) Carbon sinks in urban public green spaces under carbon neutrality: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening86: 128037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128037
60.
ZhengXYWeiCQinP, et al. (2014) Characteristics of residential energy consumption in China: findings from a household survey. Energy Policy75: 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
