In the information age, digital platforms, such as social media and local lifestyle service platforms, have deeply integrated into urban life, subtly shaping spatial regeneration and playing an important role in the process of gentrification, a form of socio-spatial “upgrading” process. This paper takes the central urban area of Nanjing, China as a case study, integrates diverse digital platform data, and employs a Random Forest machine learning model together with SHAP analysis to examine how “physical–virtual” factors jointly contribute to the process of gentrification. The findings reveal that the structure of neighborhoods remains a strong explanatory factor for gentrification (38.64%), while variables related to digital platforms account for a cumulative explanatory power of 46.09%, and the number of neighborhood service facilities contributes the least (15.26%). Digital platforms convert UGC into digital capital that shapes investment and regeneration, while reinforcing segregation through algorithmic visibility. To address these challenges, urban renewal and governance policies should prioritize zoning protections and rent control measures, enhance platform transparency and fair visibility, and simultaneously promote digital literacy programs.
BoeingGBesbrisMWachsmuthD, et al. (2021) Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies. Urban Transformations3(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2
BronsvoortIUitermarkJL (2022) Seeing the street through Instagram: digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification. Urban Studies59(14): 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539
4.
CaoL (2024a) From online to onsite: wanghong economy as the new engine driving China’s urban development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space56(4): 1061–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x231224142
5.
CaoL (2024b) Influencers and social media: gentrification aesthetics and prosumption through China’s wanghong economy. Urban Geography46(5): 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2024.2396758
CastellsM (2004) The Network Society. Edward Elgar.
8.
ChenTLZhangYE (2024) Exploring the composition features of commercial gentrification: a case study of Taipei city. Cities154: 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105391
9.
ChoASeoJKimS, et al. (2024) Assessing the effectiveness of sustainable strategies to bridge the digital divide in the mobility sector: a pilot test in Seoul. Sustainability16(10): 4078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104078
10.
Cocola-GantA (2018) Tourism gentrification. In: LeesLPhillipsM (eds) Handbook of Gentrification Studies. Edward Elgar, pp. 281–293.
DebDSmithRM (2021) Application of random forest and SHAP tree explainer in exploring spatial (in)justice to aid urban planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10(9): 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090629
13.
DeSenaJN (2018) Women and gentrification: a call for further research. Urbanities: Journal of Urban Ethnography8(2): 62–68.
14.
FastK (2024) Who has the right to the coworking space? Reframing platformed workspaces as elite territory in the geomedia city. Space and Culture27(1): 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312221090429
15.
GibbonsJNaraAAppleyardB (2018) Exploring the imprint of social media networks on neighborhood community through the lens of gentrification. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(3): 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317728289
16.
GlaeserELLucaMMoszkowskiE (2020) Gentrification and Neighborhood Change: Evidence from Yelp. National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
GlassR (1964) London: Aspects of Change. MacGibbon & Kee.
GrahamMZookM (2013) Augmented realities and uneven geographies: exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web. Environment and Planning45(1): 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44674
JeljeliRFarhiFHamdiME (2022) The mediating role of gender in social media shopping acceptance: from the WOM perspective. Heliyon8(10): e11065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11065
22.
JelksNTOJenningsVRigolonA (2021) Green gentrification and health: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(3): 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030907
23.
JiaLHeXSunS (2024) Exploring factors influencing the agglomeration of implicit consumption space: a comparison with explicit consumption space. Applied Geography169: 103340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103340
24.
KatoH (2025) Multidimensional factors correlated with population changes according to city size in Japan. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science52(4): 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241274381
25.
KimYKimY (2022) Explainable heat-related mortality with random forest and SHAP models. Sustainable Cities and Society79: 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103677
26.
KnoxPPinchS (2014) Urban Social Geography: An Introduction. Routledge.
27.
LeesL (2012) The geography of gentrification: thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography36(2): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511412998
LiFLuoJLuXM, et al. (2016) Influencing factors for the asset distribution and changing trend of Chinese households [in Chinese]. Management World2: 45–56.
30.
LiangZXBaoJG (2015) Tourism gentrification in Shenzhen, China: causes and socio-spatial consequences. Tourism Geographies17(3): 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2014.1000954
31.
LundbergSMLeeS-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 4765–4774.
32.
MazorraÁNofreJGarcía-RuizM (2025) Gentrification and touristification in lavapiés: causes and consequences of a unique interplay in today’s Southern Europe. Journal of Urban Affairs1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2025.2473956
PreisBJanakiramanABobA, et al. (2021) Mapping gentrification and displacement pressure: an exploration of four distinct methodologies. Urban Studies58(2): 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020903011
ShanLHeSWanC (2023) Unraveling the dynamic Airbnb–gentrification interrelation before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Beijing, China. Cities137: 104270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104270
39.
ShapiroA (2023) Platform urbanism in a pandemic: dark stores, ghost kitchens, and the logistical-urban frontier. Journal of Consumer Culture23(1): 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211069983
40.
SöderströmOMermetAC (2020) When Airbnb sits in the control room: platform urbanism as actually existing smart urbanism in Reykjavík. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities2: 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00015
41.
SunSWangXHuM (2022) Spatial distribution of Airbnb and its influencing factors: a case study of Suzhou, China. Applied Geography139: 102641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102641
42.
TörnbergPUitermarkJ (2022) Urban mediatization and planetary gentrification: the rise and fall of a favela across media platforms. City & Community21(4): 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841211068521
WangJLauSSY (2009) Gentrification and Shanghai’s new middle-class: another reflection on the cultural consumption thesis. Cities26(2): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.01.004
45.
WuQZhangXWaleyP (2016) Jiaoyufication: when gentrification goes to school in the Chinese inner city. Urban Studies53(16): 3510–3526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015613234
46.
ZaarMH (2017) El derecho a la vivienda en el contexto del plan especial urbanístico de alojamientos turísticos (PEUAT) de Barcelona y de sus planes antecesores. Biblio3W Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales22: 1–38.
47.
ZouS (2025) Transcoding a wanghong city: mediatized culturalization of urban places in China. Media, Culture & Society47(1): 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241271009
48.
ZukinSLindemanSHursonL (2017) The omnivore’s neighborhood? Online restaurant reviews, race, and gentrification. Journal of Consumer Culture17(3): 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515611203
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
