Arribas-BelDAlvanidesSBattyM, et al. (2021) Urban data/code: a new EP-B section. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(9): 2517–2519. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211059670
2.
BeechamRLovelaceR (2023) A framework for inserting visually-supported inferences into geographical analysis workflow: application to road safety research. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis55: 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12338
3.
BeechamRDykesJHamaL, et al. (2021) On the use of ‘glyphmaps’ for analysing Covid-19 reported cases. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10(4): 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040213
4.
BeechamRTennekesMWoodJ (2026) gridmappr: an R package for creating small multiple gridmap layouts. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251374737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251374737
5.
CreditKFarahITalenE, et al. (2026) The Walkable Accessibility Score (WAS): a spatially granular open-source measure of walkability for the continental US from 1997 to 2019. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251377116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251377116
DeakinWWangZParryJ, et al. (2026) Route network simplification for transport planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251387986. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251387986
FleischmannMVybornovaAGaboardiJ, et al. (2026) Adaptive continuity-preserving simplification of street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems123: 10235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2025.102354
10.
GoodchildMFLiW (2021) Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118: e2015759118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015759118
11.
HuckJ (2026) The QGIS polygon divider: polygon partition into an irregular equal area grid. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251378340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251378340
12.
MorganM (2026) Carbon & place: data and tools to understand the spatial variation in carbon footprints. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251401613. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251401613
13.
NelsonRWarnierMVermaT (2026) MAP: mapping accessibility for ethically informed urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(3): 23998083251387382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251387382
14.
NosekBAEbersoleCRDeHavenAC, et al. (2018) The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115: 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
15.
OSGeo (2026) OSGeo: the open source geospatial foundation. https://www.osgeo.org/ (accessed: 12.02.2026).
Walk Score (2011) Walk Score: Walk Score Methodology. Walk Score.
19.
WolfLJ (2023) The right to rule by thumb: a comment on epistemology in “a route map for successful applications of geographically-weighted regression”. Geographical Analysis55: 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12346