AbiramiSChitraP (2023) Probabilistic air quality forecasting using deep learning spatial–temporal neural network. GeoInformatica27(2): 199–235.
2.
BiljeckiF (2023) GeoAI for Urban Sensing. CRC Press, pp. 351–366. Ch. 17.
3.
CalabreseFDiaoMDi LorenzoG, et al. (2013) Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: a mobile phone trace example. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies26: 301–313.
4.
CaprottiFCugurulloFCookM, et al. (2024) Why does urban artificial intelligence (AI) matter for urban studies? Developing research directions in urban AI research. Urban Geography45(5): 883–894.
5.
ChenHLiuXLiS, et al. (2025) Spatiotemporal dynamics of violence in social unrest events based on geo-social media data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 303–318.
6.
ChengSLeiBFujiwaraK, et al. (2026) Walking through green and grey: exploring sequential exposure and multisensory environmental effects on psychological restoration. Building and Environment287: 113748.
7.
DasSSunQZhouH (2022) GeoAI to implement an individual tree inventory: framework and application of heat mitigation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening74: 127634.
8.
DubeyANaikNParikhD, et al. (2016) Deep learning the city: quantifying urban perception at a global scale. In: LeibeBMatasJSebeN, et al. (eds) Computer Vision – Eccv 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9905. Springer International Publishing, pp. 196–212.
9.
GaoSHuYLiW (2023a) Handbook of Geospatial Artificial Intelligence. CRC Press.
10.
GaoSHuYLiW, et al. (2023b) Special issue on geospatial artificial intelligence. GeoInformatica27(2): 133–136.
11.
GoodchildMFLiW (2021) Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(35): e2015759118.
12.
HuangLOkiT (2025) Enhancing people’s walking preferences in street design through generative artificial intelligence and crowdsourcing surveys: the case of Tokyo. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 435–452.
13.
HuangXWangSYangD, et al. (2024) Crowdsourcing geospatial data for Earth and human observations: a review. Journal of Remote Sensing4(0105): 0105.
14.
HuangYLiHZengX (2025) Assessing preservation boundaries for historic districts: an integrated framework of explainable AI and game theory. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 398–417.
15.
KedronPLiWFotheringhamS, et al. (2021) Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science35(3): 427–445.
16.
KnoblauchSSu YinMChatrinanK, et al. (2024) High-resolution mapping of urban Aedes aegypti immature abundance through breeding site detection based on satellite and street view imagery. Scientific Reports14(1): 18227.
17.
KnoblauchSHeideckeJde A RochaAA, et al. (2025a) Modeling intraday aedes-human exposure dynamics enhances dengue risk prediction. Scientific Reports15(1): 7994.
18.
KnoblauchSMukaratirwaRTPimentaPFP, et al. (2025b) Urban Aedes aegypti suitability indicators: a study in Rio de Janeiro, brazil. The Lancet Planetary Health9(4): e264–e273.
19.
KnoblauchSMuthusamyRKMoritzM, et al. (2025c) Crime-associated inequality in geographical access to education: insights from the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Cities160: 105818.
20.
LeiBLiuPFujiwaraK, et al. (2026) Multidimensional analysis of human outdoor comfort: integrating just-in-time adaptive interventions (Jitais) in urban digital twins. Cities168: 106443.
21.
LiW (2020) GeoAI: where machine learning and big data converge in giscience. Journal of Spatial Information Science20: 71–77.
22.
LiWHsuCY (2022) GeoAI for large-scale image analysis and machine vision: recent progress of artificial intelligence in geography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information11(7): 385.
23.
LiWArundelSGaoS, et al. (2024) GeoAI for science and the science of GeoAI. Journal of Spatial Information Science29: 1–17.
24.
LimSLeeG (2025) Spatiotemporal analysis for travel patterns of the personal mobility using an explainable machine learning approach: a case of Seoul, South Korea. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 363–376.
25.
LiuPBiljeckiF (2022) A review of spatially-explicit GeoAI applications in urban geography. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation112: 102936.
26.
LiuPWangYDe SabbataS, et al. (2025a) Living upon networks: a heterogeneous graph neural embedding integrating waterway and street systems for urban form understanding. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 453–469.
27.
LiuYWangZRenS, et al. (2025b) Physical urban change and its socio-environmental impact: insights from street view imagery. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems119: 102284.
28.
MaHZhangYCuiQ, et al. (2025) Perceived distance to greenery affects psychological restoration. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 319–335.
29.
MaiGYaoXXieY, et al. (2024) Srl: towards a general-purpose framework for spatial representation learning. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM international conference on advances in geographic information systems. ACM, pp. 465–468.
30.
MoserMKSchmidtSGrafDRM, et al. (2025) Understanding the influence of urban characteristics on cyclists’ stress measured through wearable sensors: a quantitative open data approach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 336–362.
31.
NoymanAHuKLarsonK (2025) Travelagent: generative agents in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 377–397.
32.
QuintanaMGuYLiangX, et al. (2025) Global urban visual perception varies across demographics and personalities. Nature Cities2: 1092–1106.
33.
SanchezTWBrenmanMYeX (2025) The ethical concerns of artificial intelligence in urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association91(2): 294–307.
34.
ShiW (2021) Introduction to urban sensing. In: ShiWGoodchildMFBattyM, et al. (eds) Urban Informatics. The Urban Book Series. Springer Singapore, pp. 311–314.
35.
ShinDAliagaDTunçerB, et al. (2015) Urban sensing: using smartphones for transportation mode classification. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems53: 76–86.
36.
UllahTLautenbachSHerfortB, et al. (2023) Assessing completeness of openstreetmap building footprints using mapswipe. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information12(4): 143.
37.
WangTYanFMaJ, et al. (2025) Using a machine learning framework for natural language processing to create a high-resolution carbon emission map for urban manufacturing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 284–302.
38.
XuSLiSHuangW, et al. (2022) Detecting spatiotemporal traffic events using geosocial media data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems94: 101797.
39.
YangYChenXGaoS, et al. (2023) Embracing geospatial analytical technologies in tourism studies. Information Technology & Tourism25(2): 137–150.
40.
YeXYigitcanlarTGoodchildM, et al. (2025) Artificial intelligence in urban science: why does it matter?Annals of GIS31(2): 181–189.
41.
YuanKHuangCYeY (2025) Large-scale measurement of street interface transparency based on street view data and deep learning: a study of first-tier cities in China (Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou). Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 263–283.
42.
YueYYanGLanT, et al. (2025) Shaping future sustainable cities with ai-powered urban informatics: toward human-AI symbiosis. Computational Urban Science5(1): 31.
43.
ZhangFFanZKangY, et al. (2021) “perception bias”: deciphering a mismatch between urban crime and perception of safety. Landscape and Urban Planning207: 104003.
44.
ZhangDMuSMangoJ, et al. (2025) Deep reinforcement learning for spatial resource allocation: a case study of school districting. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science53(2): 418–434.