Abstract
The sustainable preservation of historical heritage requires balancing cultural, environmental and socioeconomic factors. This study proposes an innovative framework integrating Explainable AI (XAI) and game theory to address the complexity of assessing preservation boundaries in historic districts. Focusing on the Chongqing Two-River Confluence Historic Urban Area, we applied a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). This approach facilitates a three-step process: factor analysis, multi-party game equilibrium, and preservation boundary assessment. The findings reveal that (1) historical heritage elements dominate conservation core zone decisions, underscoring the importance of prioritizing cultural value; (2) natural-geographical features, particularly river and mountain proximities, are crucial for ensuring environmental harmony in boundary design; (3) socioeconomic factors, though less influential, contribute to balancing preservation with urban development; (4) boundary assessment should integrate natural-geographical elements that maintain the spatial integrity of historical environments, moving beyond rigid artificial boundaries such as roads or administrative divisions; and (5) irregular and fragmented preservation boundaries correlate with increased likelihood of becoming zones of frequent gaming and adjustment. This study demonstrates the adaptability and interpretability of XAI in sustainable urban planning, providing a scientifically validated framework for heritage conservation.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
