Accurately identifying and analyzing cross-boundary regional cooperation remains challenging due to administrative constraints and data limitations. This study utilizes high-resolution human mobility data, network community scanning (NCS), and association rule mining to examine trans-provincial cooperation across 369 Chinese cities, leveraging Location-Based Services (LBS) data from 1.3 billion users. The findings indicate that border-adjacent cooperation dominates trans-provincial interactions in China, while non-adjacent cooperation is embedded within broader cooperative networks formed through adjacent ties reinforcing the interwoven nature of cross-administrative collaborations. Additionally, emerging cooperative clusters extend beyond officially designated urban agglomerations, revealing unrecognized regional synergies not yet captured in planning frameworks. These results highlight discrepancies between actual collaboration linkages and government-defined regional plans, underscoring the need for adaptive, data-driven policymaking and offering practical insights for regional planning and governance.
AddieJ-PDGlassMRNellesJ (2020) Regionalizing the infrastructure turn: a research agenda. Regional Studies, Regional Science7(1): 10–26.
2.
BattyM (2017) Urban studies: diverse cities, successful cities. Nature Human Behaviour1(1): 0022.
3.
CaoWDongLChengY, et al. (2023) Constructing multi-level urban clusters based on population distributions and interactions. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems99: 101897.
4.
CastanhoRAVulevicAFernándezJC, et al. (2017) Accessibility and connectivity – movement between cities, as a critical factor to achieve success on cross-border cooperation (CBC) projects. A European analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society32: 181–190.
5.
CastellsM (2010) Globalisation, networking, urbanisation: reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age. Urban Studies47(13): 2737–2745.
6.
ChenJZhaoDHeB, et al. (2022) How do fiscally created one-city monopolies cause intra-provincial inequality in China?Land Use Policy120: 106228.
7.
ChengLMiZSudmantA, et al. (2022) Bigger cities better climate? Results from an analysis of urban areas in China. Energy Economics107: 105872.
8.
ClausetANewmanMEMooreC (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics70(6): 066111.
9.
DemuynckWZhangWCasetF, et al. (2023) Urban co-opetition in megaregions: measuring competition and cooperation within and beyond the Pearl River Delta. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems101: 101951.
10.
EberleUJHendersonJVRohnerD, et al. (2020) Ethnolinguistic diversity and urban agglomeration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(28): 16250–16257.
11.
Edda HjaltadóttirRMakkonenTMitzeT (2020) Inter-regional innovation cooperation and structural heterogeneity: does being a rural, or border region, or both, make a difference?Journal of Rural Studies74: 257–270.
12.
FilipovitchAJ (2023) Megaregions and America’s future. Journal of Urban Affairs45(4): 899–901.
13.
FuYZhangX (2020) Mega urban agglomeration in the transformation era: evolving theories, research typologies and governance. Cities105: 102813.
14.
GeorgIBlaschkeTTaubenböckH (2023) Spatial delineation of urban corridors in North America: an approach incorporating fuzziness based on multi-source geospatial data. Cities133: 104129.
15.
GlucklerJ (2007) Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography7(5): 619–634.
16.
GolraOARosielloAHarrisonRT (2023) Proximity and its impact on the formation of product and process innovation networks among producer firms. Regional Studies58: 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2023.2249029.
17.
Gomez-LievanoAPatterson-LombaOHausmannR (2016) Explaining the prevalence, scaling and variance of urban phenomena. Nature Human Behaviour1(1): 0012.
18.
GrahamSMarvinS (2022) Splintering urbanism at 20 and the “infrastructural turn”. Journal of Urban Technology29(1): 169–175.
19.
GuoRMiaoCLiX, et al. (2007) Eco-spatial structure of urban agglomeration. Chinese Geographical Science17(1): 28–33.
20.
HanJPeiJYinY, et al. (2004) Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery8(1): 53–87.
21.
HanRCaoHLiuZ (2018) Studying the urban hierarchical pattern and spatial structure of China using a synthesized gravity model. Science China Earth Sciences61(12): 1818–1831.
22.
HarrisonJGuH (2021) Planning megaregional futures: spatial imaginaries and megaregion formation in China. Regional Studies55(1): 77–89.
23.
HarrisonJGuH (2023) Arguing with megaregions: learning from China’s chéngshì qún. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research2(1): 53–70.
24.
HarrisonJGallandDTewdwr-JonesM (2021a) Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies55(1): 6–18.
HazirCSAutant-BernardC (2014) Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: some empirical evidence from Europe in biotechnology. The Annals of Regional Science53(2): 369–393.
27.
HuXQWangCWuJJ, et al. (2020) Understanding interurban networks from a multiplexity perspective. Cities99: 102625.
28.
JarosKATanY (2020) Provincial power in a centralizing China: the politics of domestic and international “development space”. The China Journal83: 79–104.
29.
KimHChunYKimK (2015) Delimitation of functional regions using ap-regions problem approach. International Regional Science Review38(3): 235–263.
30.
KongQChenAShenC, et al. (2021) Has the Belt and Road Initiative improved the quality of economic growth in China's cities?International Review of Economics & Finance76: 870–883.
31.
LiLMaSZhengY, et al. (2022) Integrated regional development: comparison of urban agglomeration policies in China. Land Use Policy114: 105939.
LiuLFuXKötterT, et al. (2024) Geospatial Analytics Extension for KNIME. SoftwareX25: 101627.
34.
LiuLWangF (2025) Delineating urban agglomeration regions in China by network community scanning: structures and policy implications. Cities158: 105721.
35.
LiuLXiaBWuH, et al. (2019) Delimitating the natural city with points of interests based on service area and maximum entropy method. Entropy21(5): 458.
36.
LiuKXueYChenZ, et al. (2022a) Economic spatial structure of China's urban agglomerations: regional differences, distribution dynamics, and convergence. Sustainable Cities and Society87: 104253.
37.
LiuLWangFFuX, et al. (2024) Elevating the RRE Framework for Geospatial Analysis with Visual Programming Platforms: An Exploration with Geospatial Analytics Extension for KNIME. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation130: 103948.
38.
LiuLWangRGuanWW, et al. (2022b) Assessing reliability of Chinese geotagged social media data for spatiotemporal representation of human mobility. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information11(2): 145.
39.
MeijersEJBurgerMJ (2010) Spatial structure and productivity in US metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space42(6): 1383–1402.
40.
MonteroGTannierCThomasI (2021) Delineation of cities based on scaling properties of urban patterns: a comparison of three methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science35(5): 919–947.
41.
NeumanMHullA (2009) The futures of the city region. Regional Studies43(6): 777–787.
42.
NewmanMEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America103(23): 8577–8582.
43.
PurkarthoferEHumerAMäntysaloR (2021) Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations. Regional Studies55(5): 773–777.
44.
PurkarthoferESielkerFSteadD (2022) Soft planning in macro-regions and megaregions: creating toothless spatial imaginaries or new forces for change?International Planning Studies27(2): 120–138.
45.
SaviniF (2012) Who makes the (new) metropolis? Cross-border coalition and urban development in paris. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(8): 1875–1895.
46.
ShiYLianX (2023) The evolution of the planning system in the process of large-scale and rapid urbanization in China. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research2(2–3): 169–187.
47.
SuSLLiuZBXuYF, et al. (2017) China's megaregion policy: performance evaluation framework, empirical findings and implications for spatial polycentric governance. Land Use Policy63: 1–19.
48.
TabuchiT (1998) Urban agglomeration and dispersion: a synthesis of alonso and krugman. Journal of Urban Economics44(3): 333–351.
49.
TaylorPJ (2010) Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis33(2): 181–194.
50.
TraagVAWaltmanLvan EckNJ (2019) From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports9(1): 5233.
51.
TseliosVStathakisD (2020) Exploring regional and urban clusters and patterns in Europe using satellite observed lighting. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(4): 553–568.
52.
van MeeterenMPoorthuisADerudderB, et al. (2016) Pacifying Babel's Tower: a scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies53(6): 1278–1298.
53.
WakefieldS (2022) Critical urban theory in the Anthropocene. Urban Studies59(5): 917–936.
54.
WangFLiuL (2023) Computational Methods and GIS Applications in Social Science. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
55.
WangHZhangBLiuY, et al. (2020a) Urban expansion patterns and their driving forces based on the center of gravity-GTWR model: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Journal of Geographical Sciences30(2): 297–318.
56.
WangSGuoJLuoX, et al. (2020b) Spatial impact of high-speed railway on the urban scale:an empirical analysis from northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science30(2): 366–378.
57.
WoodallBBorowitzMWatkinsK, et al. (2023) The megaregion – forms, functions, and potential? A literature review and proposal for advancing research. International Journal of Urban Sciences28: 1–23.
58.
YeCZhuJLiS, et al. (2019) Assessment and analysis of regional economic collaborative development within an urban agglomeration: Yangtze River Delta as a case study. Habitat International83: 20–29.
59.
YehAG-OChenZ (2019) From cities to super mega city regions in China in a new wave of urbanisation and economic transition: issues and challenges. Urban Studies57(3): 636–654.
60.
YouNZhenjiangSJen-TeP, et al. (2017) Prospects for sub-regional cooperation in Fujian and Taiwan from perspective of urban planning system:A case study of Pingtan experimental area. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development5(2): 60–79.
61.
YouSQFengZMYouZ, et al. (2023) Identification and structural characteristics of urban agglomerations in China based on Baidu migration data. Applied Geography156: 102999.
62.
YuZZuJXuY, et al. (2022) Spatial and functional organizations of industrial agglomerations in China’s Greater Bay Area. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science49(7): 1995–2010.
63.
YuWBShaoZFHuangX, et al. (2023a) Multi-scale cross-city community detection of urban agglomeration using signaling big data. Geo-Spatial Information Science27: 1348–1361.
64.
YuZXiaoZYanY, et al. (2023b) The geographic disparity of agglomeration economies: evidence from industrial activities in China's emerging greater bay area. Applied Geography161: 103128.
65.
YuZDXiaoZYLiuXT (2023c) Characterizing the spatial-functional network of regional industrial agglomerations: a data-driven case study in China's greater bay area. Applied Geography152: 102901.
66.
YueHGuanQPanY, et al. (2019) Detecting clusters over intercity transportation networks using K-shortest paths and hierarchical clustering: a case study of mainland China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science33(5): 1082–1105.
67.
ZengPWeiXDuanZ (2022) Coupling and coordination analysis in urban agglomerations of China: urbanization and ecological security perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production365: 132730.
68.
ZhangFYeJZhangC, et al. (2019) Evolutionary mechanism for subregional cooperation: evidence from provincial subregion in Central China. Progress in Development Studies19(4): 304–326.
69.
ZhangPZhaoYZhuX, et al. (2020a) Spatial structure of urban agglomeration under the impact of high-speed railway construction: based on the social network analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society62: 102404.
70.
ZhangWFangCZhouL, et al. (2020b) Measuring megaregional structure in the Pearl River Delta by mobile phone signaling data: a complex network approach. Cities104: 102809.
71.
ZhangFNingYLouX (2021) The evolutionary mechanism of China's urban network from 1997 to 2015: an analysis of air passenger flows. Cities109: 103005.
72.
ZhangXLiYZhouC, et al. (2022) Rescaling of the land regime in the making of city-regions: a case study of China’s Pearl River Delta. UUrban Studies60(3): 483–500.
73.
ZhongCArisonaSMHuangXF, et al. (2014) Detecting the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science28(11): 2178–2199.
74.
ZhouWYuWQianY, et al. (2022) Beyond city expansion: multi-scale environmental impacts of urban megaregion formation in China. National Science Review9(1): nwab107.
75.
ZhuHLiuRChenB (2023) The rise of specialized and innovative little giant enterprises under China’s ‘dual circulation’ development pattern: an analysis of spatial patterns and determinants. Land12(1): 259.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
