Revisiting building height restriction policy in the historic center of Seoul: Exploring performance-based height management using view shadow simulation

Abstract

This study empirically explores 3D isovists to explore an alternative approach to a 90 m height cap in Seoul’s historic center. We introduced the concept of “view shadow” in the city center to explore potential room for growth: (1) areas hidden by existing buildings and (2) areas visible but not altering the current skyline. The proposed approach integrates the concept of view shadow cast by existing towers to minimize visual impact and preserve iconic and historic views. The simulation findings indicate that a significant portion, approximately 31 sites or 58.5% of the total, can accommodate taller towers than 90 m without compromising the integrity of the historic skyline. The study demonstrates the ability to increase the floor area by 74% and up to 137% from existing conditions to revitalize Seoul’s historic center.

Keywords

View shadow 3D isovists city center decline urban revitalization height limit Seoul

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlfeldt

Pietrostefani

(2019) The economic effects of density: a synthesis. Journal of Urban Economics 111: 93–107.

Arens

Bosselmann

(1989) Wind, sun and temperature: predicting the thermal comfort of people in outdoor spaces. Building and Environment 24(4): 315–320. DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(89)90025-5.

Arens

Ballanti

Bennett

, et al. (1989) Developing the San Francisco wind ordinance and its guidelines for compliance. Building and Environment 24(4): 297–303.

Baer

Powell

, et al. (2005) Advances in terrain augmented geometric pairing algorithms for operational test. In: ITEA modelling and simulation workshop, Las Cruces, NM, 12–15 Decemeber 2005.

Barr

Mizrach

Mundra

(2015) Skyscraper height and the business cycle: separating myth from reality. Applied Economics 47(2): 148–160.

Batty

(2001) Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 123–150.

Benedikt

(1979) To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6(1): 47–65.

Bertaud

Brueckner

(2005) Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35(2): 109–125.

Bosselmann

Arens

Dunker

, et al. (1990) Sun, wind, and pedestrian comfort: a study of Toronto's Central Area. In: Center for Environmental Design Research. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

10.

Chmielewski

Tompalski

(2017) Estimating outdoor advertising media visibility with voxel-based approach. Applied Geography 87: 1–13.

11.

City of San Francisco (1985) San Francisco general plan: downtown area plan.

12.

City of Vancouver (1989) Protecting vancouver’s views. accessed on 2021-01-26. https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/protecting-vancouvers-views.aspx.

13.

City of Vancouver (2019) Protecting vancouver’s views. accessed on 2021-01-26. https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/protecting-vancouvers-views.aspx.

14.

Dantas

Duarte

da Mota Silveira Neto

, et al. (2018) Height restrictions and housing prices: a difference-in-discontinuity approach. Economics Letters 164: 58–61.

15.

Diana

(2019) “Badung refuses plan to revise building height limits” 2019-02-03, Bali this week. accessed on 2021-01-26. https://balithisweek.com/2019/02/badung-refuses-plan-to-revise-building-height-limits/.

16.

Ding

(2013) Building height restrictions, land development and economic costs. Land Use Policy 30(1): 485–495.

17.

ekathimerini.com (2020) “Ministry wants buildings height limit of 21 meters around acropolis”. accessed on 2021-01-26. https://www.ekathimerini.com/252441/article/ekathimerini/news/ministry-wants-building-height-limit-of-21-meters-around-acropolis.

18.

Fischler

(1998) The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: revisiting the 1916 New York City ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association 64(2): 170–188.

19.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

(2012) 3D models as a platform for urban analysis and studies on human perception of space. Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models–European COST Action TU0801, 01001. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.

20.

Giseop

KIM

Ayoung

KIM

Youngchul

KIM

(2019) A new 3D space syntax metric based on 3D isovist capture in urban space using remote sensing technology. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 74: 74–87.

21.

Glaeser

(2013) A nation of gamblers: real estate speculation and American history. The American Economic Review 103(3): 1–42.

22.

Greater London Authority (2012) London view management framework: supplementary planning guidance. https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/planning/implementing-london-plan/london-plan-guidance-and-spgs/london-view-management.

23.

Hickman

(2020) Landmark ruling forces Athens hotel to demolish view-blocking top floors. The Architect’s Newspaper, accessed on 2021-01-27. https://www.archpaper.com/2020/05/landmark-ruling-forces-hotel-to-demolish-acropolis-blocking-floors/.

24.

Jeon

(2024) More Urban Homes Are Expected in Seoul by Relaxing Height Limit. Medford, NJ: E-Today, ISBN 2024-01-18.

25.

Karmelek

(2015) Will Skyscrapers Ruin Paris? New York, NY: Newsweek. accessed on 2021-01-27. https://www.newsweek.com/will-skyscrapers-ruin-paris-356206.

26.

Kim

Han

(2012) Seoul. Cities 29(2): 142–154.

27.

Kim

Rana

Wise

(2004) Exploring multiple viewshed analysis using terrain features and optimisation techniques. Computers & Geosciences 30(9-10): 1019–1032.

28.

Knowles

(1980) The solar envelope. Solar Law Reporter 2: 263.

29.

Knowles

(2003) The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings. Energy and Buildings 35(1): 15–25.

30.

Koolhaas

(1994). Delirious New York: a Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York, NY: The Monacelli Press, LLC.

31.

KOSTAT (2023) Population and housing census. Statistics Korea.

32.

Kufner

(2011) Tall Building Policy Making and Implementation in central London: Visual Impacts on Regionally Protected Views from 2000 to 2008. PhD thesis. London, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.

33.

Lavrov

Perov

(2016) The problems of high-rise construction in St. Petersburg. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 40(3): 191–197.

34.

Lewis

(2007) There’s nothing sacred about the building height limit. Washington Post, accessed on 2021-01-27. https://www.virtualadjacency.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/18-rlewis-building-heights-washpost-26my07.pdf.

35.

Liu

Rosenthal

Strange

(2018) The vertical city: rent gradients, spatial structure, and agglomeration economies. Journal of Urban Economics 106: 101–122.

36.

Liu

Rosenthal

Strange

(2020) Employment density and agglomeration economies in tall buildings. Regional Science and Urban Economics 84: 103555.

37.

Lonergan

Hedley

(2016) Unpacking isovists: a framework for 3D spatial visibility analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 43(2): 87–102.

38.

Morello

Ratti

(2009) A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(5): 837–853.

39.

Mourato

Mazzanti

(2002) Economic valuation of cultural heritage: evidence and prospects. In: Torre

Marta (eds). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.

40.

National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) (2012) Historical background on the height of building act (draft). https://www.ncpc.gov/heightstudy/docs/Historical_Background_on_the_Height_of_Buildings_Act_(draft).pdf accessed on 2023-06-06.

41.

O’Sullivan

(2013) Could the City of Light Become the City of Height? New York, NY: Bloomberg. accessed on 2021-01-26. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-09-20/could-the-city-of-light-become-the-city-of-height.

42.

Rana

Batty

(2004) Visualising the Structure of Architectural Open Spaces Based on Shape Analysis. International Journal of Architectural Computing 2(1): 123–132.

43.

Seoul Metropolitan Government (2000) Seoul city center management master plan.

44.

Seoul Metropolitan Government (2004) Seoul city center development master plan.

45.

Seoul Metropolitan Government (2015a) Seoul historic city center master plan 1. https://news.seoul.go.kr/citybuild/archives/55225 (accessed on 2021-01-28).

46.

Seoul Metropolitan Government (2015b) “Historic district master plan” 2015-11-06. access on 2021-01-26. https://urban.seoul.go.kr/view/html/PMNU5090400000#view/680.

47.

Smith

(2020) “Athens hotel ordered to demolish top floors blocking Acropolis view” the Guardians, 2020-05-11. accessed on 2021-01-27. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/11/athens-hotel-ordered-demolish-top-floors-blocking-acropolis-view-greece.

48.

Tandy

CRV

(1967) The isovist method of landscape survey. Methods of landscape analysis 10: 9–10.

49.

Tavernor

(2007) Visual and cultural sustainability: the impact of tall buildings on London. Landscape and Urban Planning 83(1): 2–12.

50.

Tavernor

Gassner

(2010) Visual consequences of the plan: managing London’s changing skyline. City, culture and society 1(2): 99–108.

51.

Willis

(1995) Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago. Princeton, UK: Princeton Architectural Press.

52.

Yang

PPJ

Putra

(2007) Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34(6): 971–992.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.48 MB