BattyM (2018) Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(5): 817–820.
2.
BattyM (2024) Digital twins in city planning. Nature Computational Science4(3): 192–199.
3.
BennettDParisLSteffiD, et al. (2024) Children in Care in the North of England: A Report Prepared for the Child of the North All-Party Parliamentary Group. Health Equity North.
4.
BoccardoPLa RicciaLYadavY (2024) Urban echoes: exploring the dynamic realities of cities through digital twins. Land13(5): 635.
5.
FengHLvHLvZ (2023) Resilience towarded digital twins to improve the adaptability of transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice173: 103686. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103686.
6.
FerrariAWillcoxK (2024) Digital twins in mechanical and aerospace engineering. Nature Computational Science4(3): 178–183.
7.
Ferré-BigorraJCasalsMGangolellsM (2022) The adoption of urban digital twins. Cities131: 103905. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103905.
8.
FotheringhamAS (2023) Digital twins: the current “Krays” of urban analytics?Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 1020–1022.
9.
Francis-DevineBDanechSMalikX (2003) Food Poverty: Households, Food Banks and Free School Meals. House of Commons Library.
10.
McCullochJGeJWardJA, et al. (2022) Calibrating agent-based models using uncertainty quantification methods. The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation25: 1. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4791.
11.
Nat Comput Sci (2024) The increasing potential and challenges of digital twins. Nature Computational Science4(3): 145–146.
12.
NochtaTWanLSchoolingJM, et al. (2021) A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: the case of city-scale digital twins. Journal of Urban Technology28(1-2): 263–287. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2020.1798177.
13.
PapyshevGYarimeM (2021) Exploring city digital twins as policy tools: a task-based approach to generating synthetic data on urban mobility. Data & Policy3: e16.
14.
SchrotterGHurzelerC (2020) The digital twin of the city of Zurich for Urban planning. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science88(1): 99–112.
15.
ShahatEHyunCTYeomC (2021) City digital twin potentials: a review and research agenda. Sustainability13(6): 3386.
16.
SpoonerFAbramsJFMorrisseyK, et al. (2021) A dynamic microsimulation model for epidemics. Social Science & Medicine291: 114461. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114461.
17.
TaoFQiQ (2019) Make more digital twins. Nature573(7775): 490–491.
18.
TomkoMWinterS (2019) Beyond digital twins – a commentary. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(2): 395–399.
19.
TrimbleS (2022) Digital twin helps Pratt expand F119 Performance for F-22. Aviation Week.
20.
WaggDBurrCShepherdJ, et al. (2024) The philosophical foundations of digital twinning.