AlessandrettiLNatera OrozcoLGSaberiM, et al. (2023) Multimodal urban mobility and multilayer transport networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2038–2070.
2.
ArasRLOuelletteNTJainRK (2023) A barrier too far: understanding the role of intersection crossing distance on bicycle rider behavior in Chicago. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2118–2132.
3.
BeechamRYangYTaitC, et al. (2023) Connected bikeability in London: which localities are better connected by bike and does this matter?Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2103–2117.
4.
BruwerMMAndersenSJ (2023) Exploiting COVID-19 related traffic changes to evaluate flow dependency of an FCD-defined congestion measure. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2220–2237.
5.
ConwayMWByrdAvan der LindenM (2017) Evidence-based transit and land use sketch planning using interactive accessibility methods on combined schedule and headway-based networks. Transportation Research Record2653(1): 45–53.
6.
CorcoranPLewisR (2023) A navigability entropy model for street networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2171–2186.
7.
de JongTBöckerLWeberC (2023) Road infrastructures, spatial surroundings, and the demand and route choices for cycling: evidence from a GPS-based mode detection study from Oslo, Norway. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2133–2150.
8.
DerudderBLiuXHongS, et al. (2019) The shifting position of the journal of transport geography in ‘transport geography research’: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Transport Geography81: 102538
9.
DillmanKJCzepkiewiczMHeinonenJ, et al. (2021) A safe and just space for urban mobility: a framework for sector-based sustainable consumption corridor development. Global Sustainability4: e28.
10.
FolcoPGauvinLTizzoniM, et al. (2023) Data-driven micromobility network planning for demand and safety. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2087–2102.
11.
FranklinR (2022) Quantitative methods I: reckoning with uncertainty. Progress in Human Geography46(2): 689–697.
12.
GiulianoGHansonS (2017) The Geography of Urban Transportation. 4th edition. New York: Guilford Publications.
13.
HandySNiemeierD (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A29(7): 1175–1194.
14.
HansonS (2006). Imagine. Journal of Transport Geography14(3): 232–233.
15.
HeinenEMattioliG (2019) Multimodality and CO2 emissions: a relationship moderated by distance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment75: 179–196.
16.
LaiYSunWSchmöckerJ-D, et al. (2022) Explaining a century of swiss regional development by deep learning and SHAP values. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2238–2253.
17.
LevinsonDWuH (2020) Towards a general theory of access. Journal of Transport and Land Use13(1): 129–158.
18.
LoweK (2021) Undone science, funding, and positionality in transportation research. Transport Reviews41(2): 192–209.
19.
LunkeEBFearnleyNAarhaugJ (2023) The Geography of public transport competitiveness in thirteen medium sized cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2071–2086.
20.
PalominosNSmithDA (2022) Examining the geometry of streets through accessibility: new insights from streetspace allocation analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2203–2219.
21.
PoorthuisAZookM (2023) Moving the 15-minute City beyond the urban core: the role of accessibility and public transport in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography110: 103629.
22.
PrignanoLFont-PomarolLMorerI, et al. (2023) Infrastructures connecting people: a mechanistic model for terrestrial transportation networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2254–2272.
23.
ReggianiGVermaTDaamenW, et al. (2023) A multi-city study on structural characteristics of bicycle networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2017–2037.
24.
SchwanenT (2017) Geographies of transport II: reconciling the general and the particular. Progress in Human Geography41(3): 355–364.
25.
SchwanenT (2018) Geographies of transport III: new spatialities of knowledge production?Progress in Human Geography42(3): 463–472.
26.
StewartAFByrdAM (2023) Half-(head)way there: comparing two methods to account for public transport waiting time in accessibility indicators. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2187–2202.
Thompson SargoniOManleyE (2023) Neighbourhood-level pedestrian navigation using Construal Level Theory. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(8): 2151–2170.
29.
TropeYLibermanN (2012) Construal Level Theory. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1: Sage Publications Ltd. London, pp. 118–134.
30.
von ThünenJH (1826) Der isolirte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirthschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg: Perthes.
31.
WillbergETenkanenHMillerHJ, et al. (2023) Measuring just accessibility within planetary boundaries. Transport Reviews1–24. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2023.2240958