AcutoMParnellSSetoKC (2018) Building a global urban science. Nature Sustainability1(1): 2–4.
2.
AgyemangFSSilvaEFoxS (2022) Modelling and simulating ‘informal urbanization’: an integrated agent-based and cellular automata model of urban residential growth in Ghana. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 863–877. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211068843
3.
BettencourtLWestG (2010) A unified theory of urban living. Nature467: 912–913.
4.
de Carvalho FilhoLSulisP (2022) Understanding and predicting the occurrence of void street interfaces. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 911–926. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221093067
5.
DurantonG (2016) Agglomeration effects in Colombia. Journal of Regional Science56(2): 210–238.
6.
Garcia-ArteagaJDLoteroL (2023) A network-based analysis to assess COVID-19 disruptions in the Bogotá BRT system. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 983–999. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221150646
7.
GlaeserELKolkoJSaizA (2001) Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography1(1): 27–50.
8.
Graells-GarridoESchifanellaROpitzD, et al. (2022) Measuring the local complementarity of population, amenities and digital activities to identify and understand urban areas of interest. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 942–957. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221117830
9.
GuanCGómezJATripathyP, et al. (2023) Evaluating the impact of water protection policy on urban growth: a case study of Jiaxing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 1000–1019. DOI: 10.1177/23998083231163182
10.
HeroySLoaizaIPentlandA, et al. (2021) COVID-19 policy analysis: labour structure dictates lockdown mobility behaviour. Journal of the Royal Society Interface18(176): 20201035.
11.
HeroySLoaizaIPentlandA, et al. (2022) Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 958–982. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221141439
12.
KeithMO'CleryNParnellS, et al. (2020) The future of the future city? The new urban sciences and a PEAK Urban interdisciplinary disposition. Cities105: 102820.
13.
LeeWDQianMSchwanenT (2021) The association between socioeconomic status and mobility reductions in the early stage of England’s COVID-19 epidemic. Health & Place69: 102563.
14.
LiuKZhaoPWanD, et al (2022) Using mobile phone big data to discover the spatial patterns of rural migrant workers’ return to work in China’s three urban agglomerations in the post-COVID-19 era. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 878–894. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211069375
15.
Neto-BradleyAPChoudharyRChallenorP (2022) A microsimulation of spatial inequality in energy access: a bayesian multi-level modelling approach for urban India. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 895–910. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211073140
16.
RandolphGFStorperM (2023) Is urbanisation in the Global South fundamentally different? Comparative global urban analysis for the 21st century. Urban Studies60(1): 3–25.
17.
RoyA (2016) Who's afraid of postcolonial theory?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(1): 200–209.
18.
TomasielloDBGiannottiM (2022) Unfolding time, race and class inequalities to access leisure. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(4): 927–941. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221111405
19.
XiongCHuSYangM, et al. (2020) Mobile device data reveal the dynamics in a positive relationship between human mobility and COVID-19 infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(44): 27087–27089.