The purpose of this research is to extend our understanding of children’s walking behavior to school in an understudied region of the world, Istanbul, Turkey. Children (aged 11–17) and their parents were surveyed to comprehend subjective and objective factors on walking behavior to school when alone or with someone. Using participatory mapping and GIS, a route detour index was first created to highlight differences in walking behaviors. A robust spatial analysis, consisting of spatial statistics and a hierarchical spatial error model, then signified important survey responses, urban design factors from space syntax, and neighborhood composition and contextual variables on between-group route choices. Empirical and geovisual analysis confirmed that accompanied children deviated more from GIS shortest routes to school than their unaccompanied peers, and “hot-spot” analysis showed it was dependent on where children reside. The spatial error models exhibited notable relations among route choice, children’s age, health, and gender. Parent attitudes concerning greenspace positively affected children’s longer route choices, while street connectivity had the opposite influence. Surprisingly, neighborhood walkability did not impact children’s route choice decisions for either group. The results provide new insights on how to encourage additional walking trips to school.
AhernSMArnottBChattertonT, et al. (2017) Understanding parents’ school travel choices: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Journal of Transport & Health4: 278–293.
2.
AlauddinMNghiembHS (2010) Do instructional attributes pose multicollinearity problems? An empirical exploration. Economic Analysis and Policy40(3): 351–361.
3.
BroachJBigazziAY (2017) Existence and use of low-pollution route options for observed bicycling trips. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2662(1): 152–159.
4.
BuckoAGPorterDESaundersR, et al. (2021) Walkability indices and children’s walking behavior in rural vs. urban areas. Health & Place72: 102707.
5.
BuliungRHessPFlowersL, et al. (2021) Living the journey to school: conceptual asymmetry between parents and planners on the journey to school. Social Science & Medicine284: 114237.
6.
BuliungRNLarsenKFaulknerG, et al. (2017) Children’s independent mobility in the city of toronto, Canada. Travel Behaviour and Society9: 58–69.
7.
BuliungRNLarsenKFaulknerGEJ, et al. (2013) The “path” not taken: exploring structural differences in mapped-versus shortest-network-path school travel routes. American Journal of Public Health103(9): 1589–1596.
8.
CarverATimperioACrawfordD (2013) Parental chauffeurs: what drives their transport choice?Journal of Transport Geography26: 72–77.
9.
CDC (2022). In: Services USDoHH (ed) Childhood Obesity Facts: Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States.
10.
CerinESaelensBESallisJF, et al. (2006) Neighborhood environment walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise38(9): 1682–1691.
11.
ClarkAFBentEAGillilandJ (2016) Shortening the trip to school: examining how children’s active school travel is influenced by shortcuts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43(3): 499–514.
12.
DasRBanerjeeA (2021) Identifying the parameters for assessment of child-friendliness in urban neighborhoods in Indian cities. Journal of Urban Affairs45: 217–235.
13.
DavisonKKWerderJLLawsonCT (2008) Children’s active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Preventing Chronic Disease5(3): A100.
14.
De VosJMokhtarianPLSchwanenT, et al. (2016) Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation43(5): 771–796.
15.
DemirelF (2017) My Neighborhood istanbul: data-driven project that captures the socio-economic picture of the city. Webrazzi, October 17, 2017.
16.
DessingDde VriesSIHegemanG, et al. (2016) Children’s route choice during active transportation to school: difference between shortest and actual route. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity13(1): 1–11.
17.
DiasCAbdullahM.LovreglioR., et al. (2022) Exploring home-to-school trip mode choices in Kandy, Sri Lanka. Journal of Transport Geography99: 103279.
18.
DingDSallisJFKerrJ, et al. (2011) Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth: a review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine41(4): 442–455.
19.
EastonSFerrariE (2015) Children’s travel to school—the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors. Transport Policy44: 9–18.
20.
EversCBolesSJohnson-SheltonD, et al. (2014) Parent safety perceptions of child walking routes. Journal of Transport & Health1(2): 108–115.
21.
FrankLDSallisJFSaelensBE, et al. (2010) The development of a walkability index: application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine44(13): 924–933.
22.
FraserLKClarkeGPCadeJE, et al. (2012) Fast food and obesity: a spatial analysis in a large United Kingdom population of children aged 13–15. American Journal of Preventive Medicine42(5): e77–e85.
23.
GetisAOrdJK (2010) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis24(3): 189–206.
24.
GolgherABVossPR (2016) How to interpret the coefficients of spatial models: spillovers, direct and indirect effects. Spatial Demography4(3): 175–205.
25.
HanLXuZSabelC (2021) Exploring the potential of urban (re) form: modifying gated communities to shorten school travel distance in Nanjing, China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(9): 2536–2553.
26.
HillierBIidaS (2005) Network and psychological effects in urban movement. Proceedings of Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT3693: 14–18.
27.
HillmanMAdamsJWhiteleggJ (1990) One False Move. London, UK: Policy Studies Institute.
28.
HinoKIkedaESadahiroS, et al. (2021) Associations of neighborhood built, safety, and social environment with walking to and from school among elementary school-aged children in Chiba, Japan. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity18(1): 152–213.
29.
HumeCBallKSalmonJ (2006) Development and reliability of a self-report questionnaire to examine children’s perceptions of the physical activity environment at home and in the neighbourhood. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity3(1): 1–6.
30.
IkedaEMavoaSHincksonE, et al. (2018) Differences in child-drawn and GIS-modelled routes to school: impact on space and exposure to the built environment in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography71(C): 103–115.
31.
ITMPPM (2012) Istanbul Transportation Master Plan Performance Monitoring Household Survey 2012. In: TransportationIMMDo (ed) Istanbul, Turkey.
32.
JonesLDavisAEyersT (2000) Young people, transport and risk: comparing access and independent mobility in urban, suburban and rural environments. Health Education Journal59(4): 315–328.
33.
KaplanSNielsenTASPratoCG (2016) Walking, cycling and the urban form: a Heckman selection model of active travel mode and distance by young adolescents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment44: 55–65.
34.
KwanMPWeberJ (2008) Scale and accessibility: implications for the analysis of land use–travel interaction. Applied Geography28(2): 110–123.
35.
LeeSLeeM-H (2021) Impact of neighborhood environment on pedestrian route selection among elementary schoolchildren in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(13): 7049.
36.
MadsenKAGoslinerWWoodward-LopezG, et al. (2009) Physical activity opportunities associated with fitness and weight status among adolescents in low-income communities. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine163(11): 1014–1021.
37.
MahSKNettlefoldLMacdonaldHM, et al. (2017) Does parental support influence children's active school travel?Preventive Medicine Reports6: 346–351.
38.
MammenGFaulknerGBuliungR, et al. (2012) Understanding the drive to escort: a cross-sectional analysis examining parental attitudes towards children’s school travel and independent mobility. BMC Public Health12(1): 862–912.
39.
MarziIDemetriouYReimersAK (2018) Social and physical environmental correlates of independent mobility in children: a systematic review taking sex/gender differences into account. International Journal of Health Geographics17(1): 1–17.
40.
MavoaSBadlandHMEaglesonS, et al. (2018) Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index. Journal of Transport and Land Use11(1): 681–700.
41.
MedeirosAClarkAMartinG, et al. (2021) Examining how children’s gender influences parents’ perceptions of the local environment and their influence on children’s independent mobility. Wellbeing, Space and Society2: 100062.
42.
MitraRBuliungRN (2014) The influence of neighborhood environment and household travel interactions on school travel behavior: an exploration using geographically-weighted models. Journal of Transport Geography36: 69–78.
43.
MitraRBuliungRNFaulknerGEJ (2010) Spatial clustering and the temporal mobility of walking school trips in the greater toronto area, Canada. Health & Place16(4): 646–655.
44.
MoranMPlautPBaron-EpelO (2016) Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children’s walking and bicycling. Journal of Transport and Land Use9(2): 43–65.
45.
MoranMRRodríguezDACorburnJ (2018) Examining the role of trip destination and neighborhood attributes in shaping environmental influences on children’s route choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment65: 63–81.
46.
MoranPA (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika37(1/2): 17–23.
47.
MüllerSMejia-DorantesLKerstenE (2020) Analysis of active school transportation in hilly urban environments: a case study of Dresden. Journal of Transport Geography88: 102872.
48.
NolandRBParkHVon HagenLA, et al. (2014) A mode choice analysis of school trips in New Jersey. Journal of Transport and Land Use7(2): 111–133.
49.
Ortegon-SanchezAMcEachanRRCAlbertA, et al. (2021) Measuring the built environment in studies of child health—a meta-narrative review of associations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(20): 10741.
50.
OzbilAYesiltepeDArginG, et al. (2021) Children’s active school travel: examining the combined perceived and objective built-environment factors from space syntax. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(1): 286.
51.
PageASCooperARGriewP, et al. (2010) Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children’s participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the PEACH Project. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity7(1): 1–10.
52.
PanterJRJonesAPVan SluijsEMF, et al. (2010) Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children’s active commuting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine38(3): 268–278.
53.
PeponisJ. BSBafnaSZhangZ (2008) The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(5): 881–901.
54.
PfleddererCDBurnsRDByunW, et al. (2021) Parent and child perceptions of barriers to active school commuting. The Journal of School Health91(12): 1014–1023.
55.
PoitrasVJGrayCEBorgheseMM, et al. (2016) Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism41(6): S197–S239.
56.
PutraIGNEAstell-BurtTCliffDP, et al. (2020) The relationship between green space and prosocial behaviour among children and adolescents: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology11: 859.
57.
RossAKurkaJM (2021) Predictors of active transportation among safe routes to school participants in arizona: impacts of distance and income. Journal of School Health92: 282–292.
58.
RossNJ (2007) ‘My Journey to School…’: Foregrounding the meaning of school journeys and children’s engagements and interactions in their everyday localities ’: foregrounding the meaning of school journeys and children’s engagements and interactions in their everyday localities. Children's Geographies5(4): 373–391.
59.
SallisJFBullFGutholdR, et al. (2016) Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet (London, England)388(10051): 1325–1336.
60.
SchlossbergMGreeneJPhillipsPP, et al. (2006) School trips: effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association72(3): 337–346.
61.
SchoeppeSDuncanMJBadlandH, et al. (2013) Associations of children’s independent mobility and active travel with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and weight status: a systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport16(4): 312–319.
62.
ShannonCE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal27(3): 379–423.
63.
SmithMHoskingJWoodwardA, et al. (2017) Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport–an update and new findings on health equity. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14(1): 158–227.
64.
SunGHanXSunS, et al. (2018) Living in school catchment neighborhoods: perceived built environments and active commuting behaviors of children in China. Journal of Transport & Health8: 251–261.
65.
TUIK (2019) Geographic statistical portal: population and demography. Available at: https://cip.tuik.gov.tr/# (accessed 26 January 2022).
66.
VaroudisTLawSKarimiK, et al. (2013) Space Syntax Angular Betweenness Centrality Revisited. Seoul: Proceedings of 9th International Space Syntax Symposium.
67.
WHO (2007) Growth Reference Data for 5-19 Years. Geneva: Report.
68.
WHO (2019) Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. World Health Organization.
69.
WongBY-MFaulknerGBuliungR (2011) GIS measured environmental correlates of active school transport: a systematic review of 14 studies. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity8(1): 1–22.
70.
YangXLiuHHeK (2016) The significant impacts on traffic and emissions of ferrying children to school in Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment47: 265–275.
71.
YarlagaddaAKSrinivasanS (2008) Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation35(2): 201–218.
72.
ZhaoJSuWLuoJ, et al. (2021) Evaluation and optimization of walkability of children’s school travel road for accessibility and safety improvement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(1): 71.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
