Smart cities and climate-resilient urban planning

Brunetta G Caldarice O Faravelli M (2022) Mainstreaming climate resilience: A GIS-based methodology to cope with cloudbursts in Turin. Italy. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1431–1447. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221076500

Chien H Hori K Saito O (2022) Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1389–1405. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211066324

Chondrogianni DV Stephanedes YJ (2022) Evaluation of urban planning methods toward bioclimatic and resilient urban spaces. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1354–1370. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211063220

George JS Paul SK Dhawale R (2022) Multilayer network structure and city size: A cross-sectional analysis of global cities to detect the correlation between street and terrain. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1448–1463. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211039853

Haraguchi M Nishino A Kodaka A , et al. (2022) Human mobility data and analysis for urban resilience: a systematic review. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1507–1535. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221075634

Hilty LM Aebischer B Rizzoli AE (2014) Modeling and evaluating the sustainability of smart solutions. Environmental Modelling & Software 56: 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.001

Khatibi H Wilkinson S Eriwata G , et al. (2022) An integrated framework for assessment of smart city resilience. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1556–1577. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221092422

Lassiter A Leonard N (2022) A systematic review of municipal smart water for climate adaptation and mitigation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1406–1430. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211072864

Lima FT Brown NC Duarte JP (2022) A grammar-based optimization approach for walkable urban fabrics considering pedestrian accessibility and infrastructure cost. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1489–1506. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211048496

Lwasa S Seto KC Bai X , et al (2022) Urban systems and other settlements. In: Shukla PR Skea J Slade R , et al. (eds) IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157926.010

Maund K Maund M Gajendran T (2022) Land use planning: an opportunity to avert devastation from bushfires. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1371–1388. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211064291

Quan SJ Chang S Igou T , et al (2022) Planning Decentralized Urban Renewable Energy Systems Using Algal Cultivation for Closed-Loop and Resilient Communities Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

Sharifi A (2016) A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators 69: 629–647. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023

Sharifi A (2019) Urban form resilience: a meso-scale analysis. Cities 93: 238–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010

Sharifi A (2020) Urban resilience assessment: mapping knowledge structure and trends [Review]. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(15): 5918. DOI: 10.3390/SU12155918

Sharifi A Allam Z (2022) On the taxonomy of smart city indicators and their alignment with sustainability and resilience. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(5): 1536–1555. DOI: 10.1177/23998083211058798

Sharifi A Yamagata Y (2016) Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60: 1654–1677. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028

Ulucak R Danish Khan SUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustainable Development 28(4): 857–867. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2041

Wilson C Pettifor H Cassar E , et al. (2019) The potential contribution of disruptive low-carbon innovations to 1.5 °C climate mitigation [journal article]. Energy Efficiency 12(2): 423–440. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-018-9679-8