The significant advances made in interpreting satellite imagery to monitor urban expansion and informal settlements has made important contributions to urban studies and planning. This paper focuses on the under-examined dimensions of how improvements to classifications of urban areas are not only a technical challenge but lie at the society/technology nexus. We examine why three different research groups produced different urban land use classifications of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam from remote sensing images. We trace how a confluence of factors including how the technology intersects with field conditions, researcher assumptions and discretionary choices, and institutional norms and agendas shaped the differences in their results. The different spatial facts they produced raises the issue of adapting algorithms for not only technical accuracy but appropriate social use. In the case of detecting informal settlements, our study finds that groundtruthing through fieldwork or collaborative partnerships is needed to not systematically overlook vulnerable populations and misinform urban planning decisions.
AngelSSheppardSCivcoDL, et al. (2005) The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion. Washington, DC: World Bank, Transport and Urban Development Department.
3.
Barros FilhoMSobreiraF (2005) Assessing texture pattern in slum across scales: an unsupervised approach. CASA Working Paper 87. London: Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL).
4.
BenjaminR (2019) Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Hoboken: Wiley.
5.
BeckALongGBoydDS, et al. (2020) Automated classification metrics for energy modelling of residential buildings in the UK with open algorithms. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(1): 45–64.
6.
BertaudA (2018) Order without Design: how Markets Shape Cities. Boston: MIT Press.
7.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structure of the Economy. Malden: Polity Press.
8.
CarpJ (2008) ‘Ground-Truthing’ representations of social space : Using Lefebvre’s conceptual triad. Journal of Planning Education and Research Journal of Planning Education and Research28: 129–142.
9.
Carr-HillR (2013) Missing millions and measuring development progress. World Development46: 30–44.
10.
CastellsM (1977) The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.
11.
DeibertRPalfreyJRohozinskiR, et al. (2011) Access Contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12.
DennisSF (2006) Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space38: 2039–2054.
13.
D’IgnazioCKleinLF (2020) Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
ElwoodS (2006) Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS10: 693–708.
15.
EubanksV (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
16.
FalcoEZambrano-VerrattiJKleinhansR (2019) Web-based participatory mapping in informal settlements: the slums of Caracas, Venezuela. Habitat International94(12): 102038.
17.
FernandesE (2007) Constructing the ‘right to the city’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies 16: 201–219.
18.
FieldE (2005) Property rights and investment in urban slums. Journal of the European Economic Association3: 279–290.
19.
FinsterbuschKVan WicklinWA (1987) The contribution of beneficiary participation to development project effectiveness. Public Administration and Development7: 1–23.
20.
FooK, GallagherE, BishopI, Kim A. (2015) Critical Landscape Visualization to LAND SI “Critical pproaches to Landscape Visualization.” Landscape and Urban Planning Landscape and Urban Planning142(2): 80–84. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.014
21.
FriesenJTaubenböckHWurmM, et al. (2018) The similar size of slums. Habitat International 73: 79–88.
22.
GhoseRElwoodS (2003) Public participation GIS and local political context: Propositions and research directions. URISA Journal15: 17–24.
23.
GlassJJ (1979) Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. Journal of the American Planning Association 45: 180–189.
24.
GraesserJCheriyadatAVatsavaiRR, et al. (2012) Image based characterization of formal and informal neighborhoods in an urban landscape. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing5: 1164–1176.
25.
HarveyD (1972) Society, the City and the Space – Economy of Urbanism. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
26.
HofmannP (2001) Detecting informal settlements from IKONOS image data using methods of object oriented image analysis-an example from Cape Town (South Africa). In: Jürgen, C (ed), Remote Sensing of Urban Areas/Fernerkundung in urbanen Räumen, Regensburg: Institut für Geographie an der Universität Regensburg pp.41- 42,
27.
HofmannPStroblJBlaschkeT, et al. (2008) Detecting informal settlements from Quickbird data in Rio de Janeiro using an object based approach. In Blaschke T, Lang S, & Hay, GJ (Eds): Object-Based Image Analysis. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp.531–553.
28.
HofmannPTaubenböckHWerthmannC (2015) Monitoring and modelling of informal settlements – A review on recent developments and challenges. In: 2015 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp.1–4.
29.
HomeR (2004) Outside de Soto’s Bell jar: Colonial/postcolonial land law and the exclusion of the peri-urban poor. In: Home R and Lim H (eds) Demystifying the Mystery of Capital: Land Tenure and Poverty in Africa and the Caribbean. London: Routledge, pp.11–28.
30.
HowarthPJ and BoassonE (1983) Landsat Digital Enhancements for Change Detection in Urban Environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 13(2): 149–160.
31.
HullMS (2008) Ruled by records: The expropriation of land and the misappropriation of lists in Islamabad. American Ethnologist 35: 501–518.
JensenJRTollDL (1982) Detecting residential land-use development at the urban fringe. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 48: 629–643.
34.
JochemWCLeasureDRPannellO, et al. (2020) Classifying settlement types from multi-scale spatial patterns of building footprints. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. DOI: 10.1177/2399808320921208.
35.
KimA, LiuD and GongP (2004) Change Detection from SPOT-Panchromatic Imagery at the Urban-Ruralfringe of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Geographic Information Sciences10(1): 42–48. 10.1080/10824000409480653
36.
KimA (2018)Smarter than Smart Cities: GIS and spatial analysis for socio-economic applications that recover humanistic media and visualization. In: Huang, B (e)Comprehensive Geographic Information Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.360–370. UN Habitat.
37.
KimA (2004) A Market Without the ‘Right’ Property Rights. Economics of Transition12(2): 275–305.
38.
KimA (2008) Learning to Be Capitalists: Entrepreneurs in Vietnam's Transition Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
KitOLüdekeMReckienD (2012) Texture-based identification of urban slums in Hyderabad, India using remote sensing data. Applied Geography32(2): 660–667.
40.
KitchinR (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. Geo Journal79(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8.
41.
KohliDSliuzasRKerleN, et al. (2012) An ontology of slums for image-based classification. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems36(2): 154–163.
42.
KohliDSliuzasRSteinA (2016) Urban slum detection using texture and spatial metrics derived from satellite imagery. Journal of Spatial Science61(2): 405–426.
43.
KufferMWangJNagenborgM, et al. (2018) The scope of earth-observation to improve the consistency of the SDG slum indicator. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information7(11): 428.
44.
KummithaRReddyKCrutzenN (2017) How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities67(7): 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010.
45.
Lamson-HallPAngelSDeGrootD, et al. (2019) A new plan for African cities: The Ethiopia urban expansion initiative. Urban Studies56(6): 1234–1249.
46.
LeFebvreH (1992) The Production of Space. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
47.
LeFebvreH (1996 [1968]). The Right to the City in Writings on Cities (translated; Kofman E and Lebas E (eds)). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
48.
LeiboldJ (2020) Surveillance in China’s Xinjiang region: Ethnic sorting, coercion, and inducement. Journal of Contemporary China29(121): 46–60. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2019.1621529.
49.
LiX and YehA (1998) Principal Component Analysis of Stacked Multi-Temporal Images for the Monitoring of Rapid Urban Expansion in the Pearl River Delta. International Journal of Remote Sensing19(8): 1501–1518.
50.
LiHWeiYDKorinekK (2017) Modelling urban expansion in the transitional greater Mekong region. Urban Studies55(8): 1729–1748.
51.
MasJ-F (1999) Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing20(1): 139–152.
52.
MillerRBSmallC (2003) Cities from space: potential applications of remote sensing in urban environmental research and policy. Environmental Science & Policy6(2): 129–137.
53.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression. New York: NYU Press.
54.
OwenKKWongDW (2013) An approach to differentiate informal settlements using spectral, texture, geomorphology and road accessibility metrics. Applied Geography38: 107–118.
55.
PasqualeF (2015) The Black Box Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
56.
PesaresiM, HuadongG, BlaesX, et al. (2013) A Global Human Settlement Layer from Optical HR/VHR RS Data: Concept and First Results. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing6(5): 2102–2131.
57.
RhinaneHHilaliABerradaA, et al. (2011) Detecting slums from SPOT data in Casablanca Morocco using an object based approach. Journal of Geographic Information System3(3): 217.
58.
RiddMKLiuJ (1998) A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment63(2): 95–100.
59.
SchneiderASetoKCWebsterDR (2005) Urban growth in Chengdu, Western China: Application of remote sensing to assess planning and policy outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32(3): 323–345.
60.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
SethiMYanYRangarajanA, et al. (2015) Scalable machine learning approaches for neighborhood classification using very high resolution remote sensing imagery. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD: 2069-2078. New York: ACM.
63.
SheltonTPoorthuisAZookM (2015) Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning142: 198–211.
64.
SliuzasRMboupGde SherbininA (2008) Report of the expert group meeting on slum identification and mapping. Report by CIESIN UN-Habitat, ITC, pp.36.
65.
SubbaramanRO’brienJShitoleT, et al. (2012) Off the map: The health and social implications of being a non-notified slum in India. Environment and Urbanization24(2): 643–663.
66.
TaubenböckHEschTFelbierA, et al. (2012) Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment117: 162–176.
67.
TaubenböckHKraffNJ (2014) The physical face of slums: A structural comparison of slums in Mumbai, India, based on remotely sensed data. Journal of Housing and the Built EnvironmentJournal of Housing and the Built Environment 29(1): 15–38.
UN-Habitat, and United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2010) State of the World's Cities 2010/11: Bridging the Urban Divide. London: Earthscan.
70.
ValverdeM (2011) Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law & Society Review45: 277–312.
71.
VatsavaiRCheriyadatABhaduriB (2014) Advances in Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery Analysis for Monitoring Human Settlements. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
72.
VermaDJanaARamamrithamK (2019) Transfer learning approach to map urban slums using high and medium resolution satellite imagery. Habitat International88(6): 101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.04.008.
73.
World Bank (2015) East Asia's Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Spatial Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
74.
WridtP (2010) A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37(1): 129–147.
75.
ZhangQWangJPengX, et al. (2002) Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multi-temporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing23(15): 3057–3078.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
