Singer was the first to draw attention to the fact that the Pareto Law (originally employed to describe income inequality) could also be applied to the size distribution of urban centres. His argument was illustrated with evidence from seven nations at various points in time. As part of his study, Singer attempted to demonstrate two propositions relating to the Pareto distribution of centre size. One was that the populations of larger centres could be described by the Pareto distribution, while the other was that the populations of the smaller (non-urban) centres would also conform to this distribution. It is argued that neither proposition can be regarded as valid.
AitchisonJBrownJAC (1957) The Lognormal Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AllenGR (1954) The “courbe des populations”: A further analysis. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics16 (5/6): 179–189.
3.
BerryBJLKasardaJD (1977) Contemporary Urban Ecology. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
4.
DentinhoT (2017) Urban concentration and spatial allocation of rents: A Zipf curve approach. Region4(3): 77–86.
5.
EeckhoutJ (2004) Gibrat’s law for all cities. American Economic Review94(5): 1429–1451.
6.
FazioGModicaM (2015) Pareto or lognormal? Best fit and truncation in the distribution of all cities. Journal of Regional Science55 (5): 736–756.
7.
GibratR (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques. Paris: Libraire de Receuil Sirey.
8.
LotkaAJ (1925) Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
9.
MillsES (1972) Urban Economics. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
10.
MillsESSongBN (1979) Urbanization and Urban Problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
ParetoV (1896) Cours D’économie Politique. Genève: Libraire Droz.
12.
ParrJB (2021) Two centre-size distributions compared. In: ReggianiASchintlerLACzamanskiD, et al. (eds) Handbook on Entropy, Complexity and Spatial Dynamics: A Rebirth of Theory? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
13.
ParrJBSuzukiK (1973) Settlement populations and the lognormal distribution. Urban Studies10(3): 335–352.
14.
ReggianiANijkampP (2015) Did Zipf anticipate spatial connectivity structures?Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design42 (3): 468–489.
15.
RosenKTResnickM (1980) The size distribution of cities: An examination of the pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics8 (2): 165–186.
16.
SingerHW (1936) The “courbe des populations”. A parallel to Pareto’s law. The Economic Journal46(182): 254–263.
