The goal of this research is to assess environmental quality at the neighbourhood level through a multi-dimensional and multi-sensory approach that combines social and physical methodologies. For this purpose, an interdisciplinary protocol has been designed to simultaneously collect physical parameter measurements (related to microclimate and acoustics) and survey data on perceptions (involving residents and non-residents). The cross-referenced analysis of data collected at six contrasting places in a district in Toulouse (France) enabled us (i) to better understand and prioritise the factors that influence residents' assessment of the quality of their living environment and (ii) to understand to what extent the differentiation of the places by the inhabitants converges with the differentiation of these places based on acoustic and micrometeorological measurements. The statistical analysis based on individuals showed the importance of noise and air quality that rank just after the aesthetic dimension for all respondents. Nevertheless, the quality of maintenance and the feeling of security that the place inspires seem to be as crucial as these environmental criteria for the inhabitants. The analysis focused on the sites highlighted the consistency between the typology of places based on perceptions and that based on acoustic measurements, which confirms the high inhabitants' sensitivity to this environmental component.
AlettaFKangJ (2015) Soundscape approach integrating noise mapping techniques: a case study in Brighton, UK. Noise Mapping2(1): 1–12.
2.
AlvesSEstévez-MaurizLAlettaF, et al. (2015) Towards the integration of urban sound planning in urban development processes: The study of four test sites within the SONORUS project. Noise Mapping2: 57–85.
3.
AndradeHAlcoforadoMOliveiraS (2011) Perception of temperature and wind by users of public outdoor spaces: Relationships with weather parameters and personal characteristics. International Journal of Biometeorology55(5): 665–680.
4.
AumondPCanALavandierC, et al. (2017) Modeling soundscape pleasantness using perceptive assessments and acoustic measurements along paths in urban context. Acta Acustica United with Acustica103(3): 430–443.
Berry-ChikhaouiIDebouletA, andRoulleau-BergerL (2007) Villes internationals: Entre tensions et réactions des habitants. Paris: La découverte, coll. Recherches, 328p (in French).
7.
Berry-ChikhaouiIDorierEHaouès-JouveS, et al. (2014a) Foreword. Méditerranée123: 13–20.
8.
Berry-ChikhaouiIDorierEHaouès-JouveS, et al. (2014b) La qualité environnementale au prisme de l’évaluation par les habitants. Méditerranée123: 89–105 (in French).
9.
BonaiutoMAielloAPeruginiM, et al. (1999) Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology19(4): 331–352.
10.
BonaiutoMFornaraFBonnesM (2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning65(1–2): 41–52.
11.
BrödePFialaDBlazejczykK, et al. (2012) Deriving the operational procedure for the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). International Journal of Biometeorology56: 481–494.
12.
BrodySDPeckBMHighfieldWE (2004) Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: A spatial and statistical analysis. Risk Analysis24: 1561–1574.
13.
CanAGauvreauB (2015) Describing and classifying urban sound environments with a relevant set of physical indicators. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America137(1): 208.
14.
CanAL’HostisAAumondP, et al. (2020) The future of urban sound environments: Impacting mobility trends and insights for noise assessment and mitigation. Applied Acoustics170: 107518.
15.
CanARademakerMvan RenterghemT, et al. (2011) Correlation analysis of noise and ultrafine particle counts in a street canyon. Science of the Total Environment409: 564–572.
16.
Economica/Anthropos, Villes, 978-2-7178-6881-4. (hal-02098837) (in french)
17.
Eliasson I et al. (2007) Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landscape and Urban Planning 82(1-2): 72–84.
18.
EmelianoffC (2007) La ville durable: l’hypothèse d’un tournant urbanistique en Europe. L'Information Géographique71(3): 48–65 (in French).
19.
EngelMSPaasBSchneiderC, et al. (2018) Perceptual studies on air quality and sound through urban walks. Cities83: 173–185.
20.
FangerPO (1972) Thermal Comfort. New York: McGraw Hill.
21.
FialaDHavenithGBrödeP, et al. (2012) UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulation. International Journal of Biometeorology56(3): 429–441.
22.
FloridaR (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books, 404p.
23.
GauvreauBGuillaumeGCanA, et al. (2016) Environmental quality at district scale: A transdisciplinary approach within the EUREQUA project. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on urban physics (FICUP), Quito, Galapagos, 26–30 September 2016122–134.
24.
Gidlöf-GunnarssonAÖhrströmE (2007) Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning83(2–3): 115–126.
25.
Haouès-Jouve S et al. (2016) De la mesure des climats périurbains : entre science et culture. in Sabine Barles (dir.), Écologies urbaines: sur le terrain.
26.
HöppeP (1999) The physiological equivalent temperature – A universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. International Journal of Biometeorology43(2): 71–75.
27.
JacobsonM (2005) Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Kabisch S, Ueberham M, Schlink U, Hertel D and Mohamdeen A.(2018) Local Residential Quality from an Interdisciplinary Perspective: Combining Individual Perception and Micrometeorological Factors. In: Kabisch S. et al. (eds) Urban Transformations. Future City, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_13
29.
KangJAlettaFGjestlandTT, et al. (2016) Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment. Building and Environment108(Supplement 455C): 284–294.
30.
KlemmWHeusinkveldBGLenzholzerS, et al. (2015) Psychological and physical impact of urban green spaces on outdoor thermal comfort during summertime in The Netherlands. Building and Environment83: 120–128.
31.
KlemmWLenzholzerSBrink van denA (2017) Developing green infrastructure design guidelines for urban climate adaptation. Journal of Landscape Architecture12(3): 60–71.
32.
KweonBSEllisCDLeeSW, et al. (2005) Large-scale environmental knowledge: Investigating the relationship between self-reported and objectively measured physical environments. Environment and Behavior38: 72–91.
33.
LemonsuAAmosséAChouillouD, et al. (2018) Comparison of microclimate measurements and perceptions as part of a global evaluation of environmental quality at neighbourhood scale. International Journal of Biometeorology64: 265–276.
34.
La Malva et al. (2015) Livingscape: a multi-sensory approach to improve the quality of urban spaces. Energy Procedia 78: 37–42.
35.
Lenzholzer S and Koh J (2010) Immersed in microclimatic space: microclimate experience and perception of spatial configurations in Dutch squares. Landscape and Urban Planning 95: 1–15.
36.
LinTPde DearRHwangR-L (2011) Effect of thermal adaptation on seasonal outdoor thermal comfort. International Journal of Climatology31: 302–312.
37.
Lin TP et al. (2014) Outdoor thermal perception in different climatic regions. Initial results from Taichun (Taiwan) and Lisbon (Portugal). Finisterra, XLiX 98: 49–58.
38.
MakaremiNSallehEJaafarMZ, et al. (2012) Thermal comfort conditions of shaded outdoor spaces in hot and humid climate of Malaysia. Building and Environment48(1): 7–14.
39.
MaransRW (2003) Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning65: 73–83.
40.
MatzarakisAMayerHIziomonMG (1999) Applications of a universal thermal index: Physiological equivalent temperature. International Journal of Biometeorology43(2): 76–84.
41.
MusyMRodriguezFGutlebenC, et al. (2012) VegDUD project: Role of vegetation in sustainable urban development. In: 8th International conference on urban climates, Dublin, Ireland, 6–10 August 2012.4p. hal-01350717
42.
Ng and Cheng (2012) Urban human thermal comfort in hot and humid Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings 55: 51–65.
43.
NapoléoneC (2006) Prix fonciers et immobiliers, et localisation des ménages au sein d’une agglomération urbaine. PhD Thesis, École Des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), France (in French).
44.
Nikolopoulou M and Lykoudis S (2006) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Analysis across different european countries. Building and Environment 41(11): 1455–1470.
45.
NikolopoulouMKleisslJLindenPF, et al. (2011) Pedestrians' perception of environmental stimuli through field surveys: Focus on particulate pollution. Science of the Total Environment409: 2493–2502.
46.
OltraCSalaR (2014) A review of the social research on public perception and engagement practices in urban air pollution. Informes Tecnicos CIEMAT 55p.
47.
PaasBSchmidtTMarkovaS, et al. (2016) Small-scale variability of particulate matter and perception of air quality in an inner-city recreational area in Aachen, Germany. Meteorologische Zeitschrift25(3): 305–317.
48.
PacioneM (2003) Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing, a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning65(1–2): 19–30.
49.
PantavouKLykoudisSPsiloglou (2017) Air quality perception of pedestrians in an urban outdoor Mediterranean environment: A field survey approach. The Science of the Total Environment574: 663–670.
50.
ParsonsK (2014) Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort, and Performance, 3rd ed.Boca Raton: CRC Press, 635p.
51.
RobertPEscoufierY (1976) A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient. Applied Statistics25(3): 257–265.
52.
Thorsson S et al. (2007) Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in japanese urban public places. Environment and Behavior 39(5): 660–684.
53.
ThibautJP (2011) The three dynamics of urban ambiances. In: LaBelle B and Martinho C (eds) Sites of Sound: Of Architecture and the Ear. Vol. 2. Berlin: Errant Bodies Press, pp.43–53.
54.
TorijaAJRuizDPRamos-RidaoAF (2013) Application of a methodology for categorizing and differentiating urban soundscapes using acoustical descriptors and semantic-differential attributes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America134(1): 791–802.
55.
Van PollR (1997) The perceived quality of the urban residential environment. A multi-attribute evaluation. PhD Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, 228p.
56.
Yang W, Moon HJ, Jeon JY. Comparison of Response Scales as Measures of Indoor Environmental Perception in Combined Thermal and Acoustic Conditions. Sustainability 2019; 11(14): 3975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143975
