This work addresses recent research in the area of pedestrian navigation aids that aims at finding alternatives to the widely used map-based turn-by-turn navigation systems in the context of Smart City environments. Four different approaches of pedestrian navigation systems were compared to each other in a user experiment that was conducted in a virtual environment: (1) map-based, (2) landmark-based, (3) augmented reality, and (4) public display navigation. The results of the experiment with 45 participants conducted in a virtual environment suggest that the augmented reality navigation performs best concerning efficiency and effectiveness and the landmark-based navigation performs worst in the context of Smart Cities.
ArmstrongRA (2014)
When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics34(5): 502–508.
2.
AtzoriLIeraAMorabitoG (2010)
The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks54(15): 2787–2805.
3.
BattyMAxhausenKWGiannottiF, Pozdnoukhov A and Bazzani A (2012)
Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics214: 481–518.
4.
BrunyéTTMoranJMHouckLA, Taylor HA and Mahoney CR (2016)
Registration errors in beacon-based navigation guidance systems: Influences on path efficiency and user reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies96: 1–11.
5.
CaragliuADel BoCNijkampP (2011)
Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology18(2): 65–82.
6.
FogliaroniPBucherDJankovicN, Giannopoulos I (2018) Intersections of our world. In: 10th international conference on geographic information science, Vol.
114, p. 3. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
7.
FogliaroniPMazurkiewiczBKattenbeckM, Giannopoulos I (2019)
Geographic-aware augmented reality for VGI. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA2: 3.
8.
GiannopoulosIKieferPRaubalM (2015) GazeNav: Gaze-based pedestrian navigation. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI ’15), pp. 337–346.
9.
GkonosCGiannopoulosIRaubalM (2017)
Maps, vibration or gaze? Comparison of novel navigation assistance in indoor and outdoor environments. Journal of Location Based Services11(1): 29–49.
10.
Gokl L, Mc Cutchan M, Mazurkiewicz B, Fogliaroni P, and Giannopoulos I, (2019)
Towards urban environment familiarity prediction. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA2: 5.
11.
HarrisonCEckmanBHamiltonR, Hartswick P, Kalagnanam J, Paraszczak J and Williams P (2010)
Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development54(4): 1–16.
12.
HartSGStavelandLE (1988)
Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology52: 139–183.
13.
HegartyMRichardsonAEMontelloDR, Lovelace K and Subbiah I (2002)
Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence30(5): 425–447.
14.
HollandSMorseDRGedenrydH (2002)
AudioGPS: Spatial audio navigation with a minimal attention interface. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing6(4): 253–259.
15.
KelleyJF (1983) An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp. 193–196.
16.
LaugwitzBHeldTSchreppM (2008)
Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. HCI and Usability for Education and Work4: 63–76.
17.
MayAJRossTBayerSH and Tarkiainen MJ (2003)
Pedestrian navigation aids: Information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing7(6): 331–338.
18.
OhmCBienkSKattenbeckM, Ludwig B and Müller M (2015)
Towards interfaces of mobile pedestrian navigation systems adapted to the user’s orientation skills. Pervasive and Mobile Computing26: 121–134.
19.
ParushAAhuviaSErevI (2007) Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: International conference on spatial information theory, Springer, pp. 238–254.
20.
PokricBKrcoSPokricM (2014) Augmented reality based smart city services using secure IoT infrastructure. In: 2014 28th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops (WAINA), IEEE, pp. 803–808.
21.
RaubalMWinterS (2002)
Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geographic Information Science2478(1): 243–259.
22.
RehrlKHäuslerELeitingerS, and Bell D (2014)
Pedestrian navigation with augmented reality, voice and digital map: Final results from an in situ field study assessing performance and user experience. Journal of Location Based Services8(2): 75–96.
23.
RichterKFDuckhamM (2008) Simplest instructions: Finding easy-to-describe routes for navigation. In: International conference on geographic information science, Springer, pp. 274–289.
24.
Richter, K. F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks: GIscience for intelligent services. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
25.
RukzioEMüllerMHardyR (2009) Design, implementation and evaluation of a novel public display for pedestrian navigation: The rotating compass. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’09), pp. 113–122.
26.
SchirmerMHartmannJBertelS, Echtler F (2015) Shoe me the way: A shoe-based tactile interface for eyes-free urban navigation. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM, pp. 327–336.
27.
SchreppMOlschnerSSchubertU (2013)
User experience questionnaire benchmark Praxiserfahrungen zum Einsatz im Business-Umfeld. Usability Professionals13.
28.
TaherFCheverstK (2011) Exploring user preferences for indoor navigation support through a combination of mobile and fixed displays. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, MobileHCI ’11, pp. 201–210. New York, NY: ACM.
29.
TakeuchiYPerlinK (2012) Clayvision: The (elastic) image of the city. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp. 2411–2420.
30.
WinterS (2003) Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: International conference on spatial information theory, Springer, pp. 349–361.
