ArroubAZahiBSabirE, et al. (2016) A literature review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems. In: 2016 International conference on wireless networks and mobile communications (WINCOM), pp. 180–186. Fez, Morocco: IEEE.
2.
BasuRFerreiraJ (2020) A LUTI microsimulation framework to evaluate long-term impacts of automated mobility on the choice of housing-mobility bundles. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1397–1417.
3.
BattyM (2013) The New Science of Cities.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
4.
CaiZWangBCongC, et al. (2020) Spatial dynamic modelling for urban scenario planning: a case study of Nanjing, China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1380–1396.
5.
DealBPanHPallathucherilV, et al. (2017a)
Urban resilience and planning support systems: the need for sentience. Journal of Urban Technology24(1): 29–45.
6.
DealBPanHTimmS, et al. (2017b)
The role of multidirectional temporal analysis in scenario planning exercises and planning support systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems64: 91–102.
7.
DealBSchunkD (2004)
Spatial dynamic modeling and urban land use transformation: a simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl. Ecological Economics51(1-2): 79–95.
8.
FothM (2011) Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City.
Hershey, PA:
Information Science Reference.
9.
GeertmanS (2006)
Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33(6): 863–880.
10.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (eds.) (2003) Planning Support Systems in Practice (Advances in Spatial Science).
Heidelberg:
Springer Verlag, 578 p.
11.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (eds.) (2009) Planning Support Systems: Best Practice and New Methods (Advances in Spatial Science).
New York:
Springer Publishers, pp.511.
12.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (2020a) Handbook of Planning Support Science.
Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.555.
13.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (2020b)
Planning support science: Developments and challenges. Environment and Planning B; Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1326–1342.
14.
HarrisB (1965)
New tools for planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners31(2): 90–95.
15.
HopkinsLD (1999)
Structure of a planning support system for urban development. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26(3): 333–343.
16.
JiaZChenLChenJ, et al. (2020)
Urban modeling for streets using vector cellular automata: Framework and its application in Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1418–1439.
17.
JiangHGeertmanSWitteP (2020) Does the PSS discourse have something to offer to the smart governance debate? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1343–1360.
18.
KingstonRCarverSEvansA, et al. (2000)
Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems24(2): 109–125.
19.
KlostermanRE (1997)
Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research17(1): 45–54.
20.
KontokostaC (2018)
Urban informatics in the science and practice of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18793716
21.
LautsoK (2003) The SPARTACUS system for defining and analysing sustainable urban land use and transport policies. In: Planning Support Systems in Practice.
Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer, pp.453–463.
22.
LimCKimKJMaglioPP (2018)
Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities82: 86–99.
23.
LowryIS (1964) A Model of Metropolis.
Santa Monica, CA:
The Rand Corporation, RM-4036-RC.
24.
MeerowSNewellJPStultsM (2016)
Defining urban resilience: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning147: 38–49.
25.
MikhailovAIChernyiAIGiljarevskijRS (1967)
Informatics–new name for the theory of scientific information. FID News Bulletin17(7): 70–74.
26.
PageJMörtbergUDestouniG, et al. (2020) Open-source planning support system for sustainable regional planning: A case study of Stockholm County, Sweden. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1508–1523.
27.
PanHDealB (2020)
Reporting on the performance and usability of planning support systems—towards a common understanding. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy13(1): 137–159.
28.
PanHChenSGaoY, et al. (2020) An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1456–1473.
29.
PelzerPGeertmanSvan der HeijdenR, et al. (2014)
The added value of planning support systems: a practitioner's perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems48: 16–27.
30.
PelzerPGeertmanSvan der HeijdenR (2016)
A comparison of the perceived added value of PSS applications in group settings. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems56: 25–35.
31.
PereiraGVMacadarMALucianoEM, et al. (2017)
Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context. Information Systems Frontiers19(2): 213–229.
32.
PettitCJ (2005)
Use of a collaborative GIS-based planning-support system to assist in formulating a sustainable-development scenario for Hervey Bay. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32(4): 523–545.
33.
PettitCShiYHanH, et al. (2020) A new toolkit for land value analysis and scenario planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(8): 1490–1507.
34.
PettitCBakelmunALieskeSN, et al. (2018)
Planning support systems for smart cities. City, Culture and Society12: 13–24.
35.
PuntEGeertmanSAfroozA, et al. (2020)
Life is a scene and we are the actors: assessing the usefulness of planning support theaters for smart planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems82: 101485.
36.
SchintlerLA (2017) The constantly shifting face of the digital divide: Implications for big data, urban informatics, and regional science. In: Schintler, L.A. and Chen, Z (eds) Big Data for Regional Science. UK, London: Routledge, pp.336–346.
37.
ThakuriahPVTilahunNYZellnerM (2017) Big data and urban informatics: innovations and challenges to urban planning and knowledge discovery. In: Seeing Cities through Big Data (pp. 11–45). Cham: Springer.
38.
van den BuuseDKolkA (2019)
An exploration of smart city approaches by international ICT firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change142: 220–234.
39.
VonkGGeertmanSSchotP (2005)
Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space37(5): 909–924.
40.
VoorheesAM (1959) “The Nature and Uses of Models in City Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25(2): 57–60.
41.
WaddellP (2002)
UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association68(3): 297–314.
42.
WegenerM (1982)
Modeling urban decline: a multilevel economic-demographic model for the Dortmund region. International Regional Science Review7(2): 217–241.
43.
WellischH (1972)
From information science to informatics: A terminological investigation. Journal of Librarianship4(3): 157–187.
44.
WhiteREngelenG (1993)
Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space25(8): 1175–1199.
45.
XuCHaaseDSuM, et al. (2020) Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1361–1379.
46.
YangPP-JChangSSahaN, et al. (2020) Data-driven planning support system for a campus design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1474–1489.
47.
YangT (2020)
Understanding commuting patterns and changes: Counterfactual analysis in a planning support framework. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(8): 1440–1455.
48.
YehH (2017)
The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: from citizens' perspectives. Government Information Quarterly34(3): 556–565.