Virtual reality environments have created new opportunities for visualizing social spaces in three dimensions, which enable addition of a vertical dimension. This creates a topographical landscape based on socio-economic characteristics of the urban system. Quantification of the socio-economic disparities between city pairs in relation to the spatial distances is the social topography slope, where a steeper slope indicates greater inequality in dense environments. To illustrate the effect of this measure of social inequality, we ask, what is the relationship between the value of the slope (the interaction between social and geographical distance) and the rates of crimes committed by residents of neighboring localities in a major locality? We test the applicability of this new measure to explain spatial discrepancies in social problems and find that high social inequality is significantly correlated with crime (R2 = 0.50, P < 0.001) and mean income per capita to measure poverty (R2 = 0.36, P < 0.001).
Aharon-Gutman M, Schaap M and Lederman I (2018). Social topography: Studying spatial inequality using a 3D regional model. Journal of Rural Studies 62: 40–52.
2.
AlbuquerquePH (2007)
Shared legacies, disparate outcomes: Why American south border cities turned the tables on crime and their Mexican sisters did not. Crime, Law and Social Change47(2): 69–88.
3.
AnselinLBeraA (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: UllahAGilesDEA (eds) Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics.
New York:
Marcel Dekker, pp. 237–264.
4.
BallKJefferyRWCrawfordDA, et al. (2008)
Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Preventive Medicine47(3): 294–298.
5.
BardetG (1951)
Social topography. Town Planning Review22(3): 237.
6.
BattyM (2013)
Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography3(3): 274–279.
7.
BlauJRBlauPM (1982)
The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review47(1): 114–129.
8.
BourdieuP (1989)
Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
9.
BragaAAWeisburdD (2010) Policing Problem Places: Crime Hot Spots and Effective Prevention.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
10.
BraithwaiteJ (2013) Inequality, Crime and Public Policy (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.
11.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ (1993)
Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology13(1): 3–28.
12.
BrowningCRDietzRDFeinbergSL (2004)
The paradox of social organization: Networks, collective efficacy, and violent crime in urban neighborhoods. Social Forces83(2): 503–534.
13.
BurckLKababiaY (1996) Characterization and Ranking of Local Authorities According to the Socio-Economic Level of the Population in 1995. Publication No. 1039. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.
14.
Comaroff J and Comaroff J (2007). Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Social Anthropology 15(2): 133–152.
15.
Central Bureau of Statistics (2000) Characterization and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population. 1995 Census of Population and Housing Publications No. 13. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.
16.
Central Bureau of Statistics (2008) Characterization and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population, 2008.
Jerusalem:
Central Bureau of Statistics.
17.
Central Bureau of Statistics (2013) Characterization and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population, 2013.
Jerusalem:
Central Bureau of Statistics.
Central Bureau of Statistics (2015) Characterization and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population, 2015.
Jerusalem:
Central Bureau of Statistics.
Fleishman L, Gubman Y and Tur-Sinai A (2015)
Dwelling price ranking versus socioeconomic clustering: Possibility of imputation. Journal of Official Statistics31(2): 205–229.
29.
GansHJ (2002)
The sociology of space: A use-centered view. City and Community1(4): 329–339.
30.
GouldEDWeinbergBAMustardDB (2002)
Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979–1997.Review of Economics and Statistics84(1): 45–61.
31.
HayekUW (2011)
Which is the appropriate 3D visualization type for participatory landscape planning workshops? A portfolio of their effectiveness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38(5): 921–939.
32.
HealyKMoodyJ (2014)
Data visualization in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology40: 105–128.
33.
HelmutAKGerhardsJRomoFP (1995)
Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: Examining Bourdieu’s social topography. American Journal of Sociology100(4): 859–903.
34.
HopkinJLynchJ (2016)
Winner-take-all politics in Europe? European inequality in comparative perspective. Politics & Society44(3): 335–343.
35.
JacksonEKupkeVRossiniP (2007) The relationship between socio-economic indicators and residential property values in Darwin. In: Paper presented at the 13th annual Pacific-Rim real estate society conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.
36.
Jeffery CR (1971) Crime prevention through environmental design (Vol. 91). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
37.
JolliffeIT (2002) Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.
KellyM (2000)
Inequality and crime. Review of Economics and Statistics82(4): 530–539.
40.
KitchinR (2014)
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal79(1): 1–14.
41.
LeaoSBishopIEvansD (2001)
Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling33(4): 289–313.
42.
LobaoL (1996)
A sociology of the periphery versus a peripheral sociology: Rural sociology and the dimension of space. Rural Sociology61(1): 77–102.
43.
LobaoLMHooksGTickamyerAR (2007) Introduction: Advancing the sociology of spatial inequality. In: The Sociology of Spatial Inequality. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 1–25.
44.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
45.
MennisJGuoD (2009)
Spatial data mining and geographic knowledge discovery – An introduction. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems33(6): 403–408.
46.
NeumayerE (2005)
Inequality and violent crime: Evidence from data on robbery and violent theft. Journal of Peace Research42(1): 101–112.
47.
Newman O & National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice (1973) Architectural design for crime prevention (pp. 2700–00161). Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
48.
OlaussonPOVageroD (1991)
Miscellanea, a Swedish classification into social classes based on census information and comparable to the British classification – A proposal.Journal of Official Statistics7: 93–103.
49.
OrensteinDEZimroniHEizenbergE (2015)
The immersive visualization theater: A new tool for ecosystem assessment and landscape planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 347–355.
50.
PainR (2000)
Place, social relations and the fear of crime: A review. Progress in Human Geography24(3): 365–387.
51.
PattilloME (1998)
Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Managing crime in a black middle-class neighborhood. Social Forces76(3): 747–774.
52.
PetersonRDKrivoLJ (2010) Divergent Social Worlds: Neighborhood Crime and the Racial-Spatial Divide.
New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
Pink B (2006). An introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
54.
PortmanMENatapovAFisher-GewirtzmanD (2015)
To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 376–384.
55.
RatcliffeJH (2004)
The hotspot matrix: A framework for the spatio‐temporal targeting of crime. Police Practice and Research5(1): 5–23.
56.
RegenbrechtHDonathD (1997) Architectural education and virtual reality aided design (VRAD). In: Designing Digital Space: An Architects Guide to Virtual Reality, Wiley, pp.155–176.
57.
Rose D and Pevalin DJ (2001) The National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification: unifying official and sociological approaches to the conceptualisation and measurement of social class, ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2001-04, University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Colchester.
58.
ShermanL (1995)
Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies4: 35–52.
59.
ShermanLWGartinPRBuergerME (1989)
Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology27(1): 27–56.
60.
Sherman LW and Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice quarterly 12(4): 625–648.
61.
ShortaMBBrantinghambPJBertozzicAL, et al. (2010)
Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America107(9): 3961–3965.
62.
TaylorRBGottfredsonSDBrowerS (1984)
Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency21(4): 303–331.
63.
TickamyerAR (2000)
Space matters! Spatial inequality in future sociology. Contemporary Sociology29(6): 805–813.
64.
ToblerW (1970)
A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region.Economic Geography46(Supplement): 234–240.
65.
VertovecS (2007)
Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1024–1054.
66.
VigneswaranD (2014)
The contours of disorder: Crime maps and territorial policing in South Africa. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31: 91–107.
67.
WangNLiuLEckJE (2014)
Analyzing crime displacement with a simulation approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design41(2): 359–374.
68.
Weisburd D (2004) The emergence of crime places in crime prevention. Punishment, Places and Perpetrators, 155.
69.
WeisburdD (2015)
The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology53(2): 133–157.
70.
WeisburdDAmramS (2014)
The law of concentrations of crime at place: The case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Practice and Research15(2): 101–114.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
