Our study aims to explore whether simultaneous municipal autonomy and institutional fragmentation foster urban sprawl. We discuss the hypothesis that in such a setting, competition between municipalities to attract development leads to high degrees of urban sprawl. A comparison of the 26 Swiss cantons was carried out using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis combining the aforementioned conditions with other urban sprawl drivers. As a result, four consistent, sufficient combinations of conditions were identified. These combinations show that municipal autonomy and institutional fragmentation are indeed linked to high degrees of urban sprawl. This is especially true when municipal autonomy and institutional fragmentation are combined with the economic triggers of competition between municipalities and oversized designated building zones. These results draw attention to the necessity of stronger supra-municipal coordination within the framework of Swiss land use planning policy.
AscherF (2001) Les Nouveaux Principes de L’urbanisme.
La Tour d’Aigues:
L’aube.
2.
BuzbeeWW (2009)
Urban sprawl, federalism, and the problem of institutional complexity. Fordham Law Review68(1): 57–136.
3.
CouchCLeontidouLPetschel-HeldG (eds) (2007) Urban Sprawl in Europe. Landscape, Land-Use Change and Policy.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
4.
EEA (European Environment Agency) and FOEN (Swiss Federal Office for the Environment) (2016) Urban sprawl in Europe. Joint EEA-FOEN report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-sprawl-in-europe (accessed 8 October 2018).
5.
EwingR (1997)
Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?Journal of the American Planning Association63(1): 107–126.
6.
FOSD – Swiss Federal Office for Spatial Development (2012) Statistique Suisse des Zones à Bâtir 2012.
Bern:
FOSD.
7.
GennaioMPHerspergerAMBürgiM (2009)
Containing urban sprawl – Evaluating effectiveness of urban growth boundaries set by the Swiss Land Use Plan.Land Use Policy26: 224–232.
8.
HamelPKeilR (eds) (2015) Suburban Governance: A Global View.
Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division.
9.
HardinG (1968)
The tragedy of the commons.Science162(3859): 1243–1248.
10.
JaegerJAGBertillerRSchwickC, et al. (2010)
Urban permeation of landscapes and sprawl per capita: New measures of urban sprawl.Ecological Indicators10(2): 427–441.
11.
JaegerJAGSchwickC (2014)
Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted urban proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland.Ecological Indicators38: 294–308.
12.
KammermannL (2018)
Factors driving the promotion of hydroelectricity: A qualitative comparative analysis.Review of Policy Research35(2): 213–237.
13.
KeatingM (1995) Size, efficiency and democracy: Consolidation, fragmentation and public choice. In: JudgeD, et al. (eds) Theories of Urban Politics.
London:
Thousand Oaks, pp.117–134.
14.
KnoepfelPNahrathS (2007) Environmental and spatial development policy. In: KlötiU (ed) Handbook of Swiss Politics.
Zurich:
NZZ, pp.705–733.
15.
KüblerD (2005) La Métropole et le Citoyen. Les Agglomérations Urbaines en Suisse Vues par Leurs Habitants.
Lausanne:
PPUR.
16.
MahaimR (2014) Le Principe de Durabilité et L’aménagement du Territoire. Le Mitage du Territoire à L’épreuve du Droit.
Genève:
Schulthess.
17.
MannS (2009)
Institutional causes of urban and rural sprawl in Switzerland.Land Use Policy26: 919–924.
18.
MuggliR (2014) Ist der Föderalismus an der Zersiedelung Schuld?
Zurich:
NZZ Libro.
19.
NortonA (1994) International Handbook of Local and Regional Government. A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Democracies.
Aldershot/Brookfield:
Edward Elgar.
20.
OFS – Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2000) Recensement de la Population 2000.
Berne:
OFS.
OFS – Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2018) Encyclopédie Statistique de la Suisse. Demographic and economic data collected by the author for different years. Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/population.html (accessed 8 October 2018).
25.
OstromVOstromE (1971)
Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration.Public Administration Review31(2): 203–216.
26.
PagliarinS (2018) Linking processes and patterns: Spatial planning, governance and urban sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan metropolitan regions. Urban Studies 55(16): 3650--3668
PendallR (1999)
Do land-use controls cause sprawl?Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26(4): 555–571.
29.
PhelpsNAWoodAM (2011)
The new post-suburban politics?Urban Studies48: 2591–2610.
30.
RaginC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
31.
RaginC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond.
Chicago, IL/London:
University of Chicago Press.
32.
RaginCDaveyS (2017) fs/QCA [Computer Programme], Version 3.0.
Irvine:
University of California.
33.
RihouxBRaginC (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques.
Los Angeles, CA:
SAGE.
34.
SCB – Statistiska centralbyrån (2018) Statistical database. Demographic data collected online by the author for 2014. Available at: http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se (accessed 8 October 2018).
35.
SchneiderCWagemannC (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
36.
SchwickCJaegerJAGBertillerR, et al. (2012) Urban Sprawl in Switzerland – Unstoppable? Quantitative Analysis 1935 to 2002 and Implications for Regional Planning.
Bern:
Haupt Verlag.
37.
SchwickCJaegerJAGHerspergerA, et al. (2018) Zersiedelung Messen und Begrenzen. Massnahmen und Zielvorgaben für die Schweiz, ihre Kantone und Gemeinden. [Measuring and Limiting Urban Sprawl. Measures and Targets for Switzerland, its Cantons and Municipalities].
Zürich:
Bristol-Stiftung; Bern: Haupt-Verlag.
38.
SiedentopSFinaS (2012)
Who sprawls most? Exploring the patterns of urban growth across 26 European countries.Environment and Planning A44: 2765–2784.
39.
SquiresGD (2002) Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences & Policy Responses.
Washington, DC:
The Urban Institute Press.
40.
ThomannE (2015)
Customizing Europe: Transposition as bottom-up implementation.Journal of European Public Policy22(10): 1368–1387.
TieboutC (1956)
A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64(5): 416–424.
43.
TosicsISzemzőHIllésD, et al. (2010) National spatial planning policies and governance typology. Deliverable report 2.2.1 PLUREL. Available at: http://www.plurel.org/images/D221.pdf (accessed 11 October 2018).
44.
WeilenmannBSeidlISchulzT (2017)
The socio-economic determinants of urban sprawl between 1980 and 2010 in Switzerland.Landscape and Urban Planning157: 468–482.
45.
WilsonBChakrabortyA (2013)
The environmental impacts of sprawl: Emergent themes from the past decade of planning research.Sustainability5: 3302–3327.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
