This study compared the impression structure of streetscapes gained from field experiments with that from head-mounted display virtual reality experiments. The results were as follows: (1) the field experiment experience had a slight influence on the impressions reported from the head-mounted display experiment; (2) few items exhibited significant differences in impression values for the two experiments; (3) the impression structure comprised three factors—“Openness,” “Balance,” and “Activity”—in both experiments, and (4) no significant difference appeared between the two experiments relative to the subscale scores of these three factors. These results show that head-mounted display experiments can substitute field experiments.
EndoHYamadaH (2008)
A comparative study of psychology evaluation by on-site and using slide evaluation methods in street space with roadside trees.Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture71(5): 675–678.
HullRBStewartWP (1992)
Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements.Journal of Environmental Psychology12(2): 101–114.
4.
KobaNKishimotoT (2009)
Impression evaluation of streetscape by super high-rise buildings set-back In high-rise part: Streetscape analysis using virtual reality in Marunouchi-nakadori avenue.Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering74(645): 2435–2442.
5.
KuligaSFThrashTDaltonRC, et al. (2015)
Virtual reality as an empirical research tool – Exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 363–375.
6.
LinJJWDuhHBLParkerDE, et al. (2002) Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings, IEEE virtual reality 2002, Orlando, FL, USA, 24–28 March 2002, pp.164–171. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
7.
MaghelalPNatesanPNaderiJR, et al. (2011)
Investigating the use of virtual reality for pedestrian environments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research28(2): 104–117.
8.
ManabeSShinyaMShiraishiM (2015)
Oculus earth – A VR application utilizing Google Earth and HMD. ITE Technical Report39(14): 191–194.
9.
MatsuyaYMitsuhashiNKimJ (2008)
A study on evaluation of the streetscape in Tochigi City. Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting Architectural Institute of JapanF-1, pp.885–886.
10.
Mechanical Social Systems Foundation (2017) Strategy planning report on Immersive Image System with Head Mounted Display, Report, Digital Content Association of Japan, Japan, March.
11.
MiyamotoFTaniguchiH (1985)
Perceived semantic dimensions and stability: Planning of outdoor architectural space on campuses, Part 1.Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering348(2): 27–37.
12.
NapieralskiPEAltenhoffBMBertrandJW, et al. (2014)
An evaluation of immersive viewing on spatial knowledge acquisition in spherical panoramic environments.Virtual Reality18(3): 189–201.
13.
NatapovAFisher-GewirtzmanD (2016)
Visibility of urban activities and pedestrian routes: An experiment in a virtual environment.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems58: 60–70.
14.
NishioSItoF (2015)
The effect of sky factor and the change on impression of townscape: With the experiment for evaluation impression while walking.Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering80(710): 907–914.
15.
NishioSItoF (2016)
Experimental method for impression evaluation using HMD of street sequence, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting. Architectural Institute of Japan2016: 1063–1064.
16.
NomuraTAokiHHirasaY (1974)
Similarity in field survey and slide survey. Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting.Architectural Institute of Japan, Architecture and Planning49(8): 83–84.
17.
OhnoRAokiHSoedaM (2001)
A visual simulation by realtime CD overlaid on the video image of a scale model.AIJ Journal of Technology and Design12: 135–138.
18.
OrensteinDEZimroniHEizenbergE (2015)
The immersive visualization theater: A new tool for ecosystem assessment and landscape planning.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 347–355
19.
ParkJAkahoriAMunemotoJ, et al. (2009)
Study on inference of combination rules for facade elements by sensibility evaluation using virtual reality: Case of Sanneizaka preservation district for preservation of historic buildings. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering74(636): 363–370.
20.
PortmanMENatapovAFisher-GewirtzmanD (2015)
To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning,Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 376–384
21.
RieckeBEFreibergJBGrechkinTY (2015)
Can walking motions improve visually induced rotational self-motion illusions in virtual reality?Journal of Vision15(2): 1–15.
22.
SahmSCCreem-RegehrSHThompsonWB, et al. (2005)
Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments.ACM Transactions on Applied Perceptions2(1): 35–45.
23.
SetaSMatsumotoNOkajimaT, et al. (1997)
Development of the visual simulator directly connected with perceptual behavior.AIJ Journal of Technology and Design3(4): 92–96.
24.
ShushanYPortugaliJBlumenfeld-LieberthalE (2016)
Using virtual reality environments to unveil the imageability of the city in homogenous and heterogeneous environments.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems58: 29–38.
25.
SueshigeYMorozumiM (2005)
Assessment of the linked QTVR simulator for observing strolling activities of citizens: On the relationship of strolling activities and visual information given by the environment in downtown Kumamoto.Journal of Architecture and Planning70(597): 119–125.
26.
ThompsonWBWillemsenPGoochAA, et al. (2004)
Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments?Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments13(5): 560–571.
27.
YamagishiRUchidaS (1988)
On the way of studying visual environment. Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting.Architectural Institute of Japan1988: 111–112.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
