Traditional studies of residential segregation use a descriptive index approach with predefined spatial units to report the degree of neighbourhood differentiation. We develop a model-based approach which explicitly includes spatial effects at multiple scales, recognising the complexity of the urban environment while simultaneously distinguishing segregation at each scale net of all other scales. Moreover, this model distinguishes segregation as unevenness and as spatial clustering in the presence of stochastic variation. The modelling approach, unlike traditional index approaches, allows hypothesis evaluation concerning alternative scales and zonation through an accompanying badness-of-fit measure. Ultimately, this permits the identification of the scale and zonation regime where the spatial patterns come into focus thereby directly tackling the modifiable areal unit problem. The model is applied to Indian ethnicity in Leicester, UK, finding segregation as unevenness and as spatial clustering at multiple scales.
AmrheinC (1995) Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: Evidence from statistical simulations. Environment and Planning A27(1): 105–119.
2.
ArcayaMCSchwartzGSubramanianSV (2018) A multi-level modeling approach to understanding residential segregation in the United States. Environment and Planning B. Epub ahead of print 14 March 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2399808318760858.
3.
BrowneWJ (2017) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN 3.0, University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
4.
BrowneWJDraperD (2006) A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis1(3): 473–550.
BrowneWJSubramanianSVJonesKet al.(2005) Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A168(3): 599–613.
7.
BrunsdonCFotheringhamSCharltonM (2002, September) Geographically weighted local statistics applied to binary data. International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 38–50.
8.
BrunsdonC (2017) Quantitative methods II: Issues of inference in quantitative human geography. Progress in Human Geography41(4): 512–523.
9.
BullenNIJonesKDuncanC (1997) Modelling complexity: Analysing between-individual and between-place variation. Environment and Planning A29(4): 585–609.
10.
ByrneD (1998) Class and ethnicity in complex cities – The cases of Leicester and Bradford. Environment and Planning A30(4): 703–720.
11.
CarringtonWJTroskeKR (1997) On measuring segregation in samples with small units. Journal of Business and Economic Statistic15(4): 402–429.
12.
CaseyL (2016) The Casey Review: A Review into Opportunity and Integration, London: Queen's Printer and Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
13.
CharltonCJRasbashJBrowneWJet al.(2017) MLwiN Version 3.00, University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
14.
CockingsSHarfootAHornbyD (2009) Towards 2011 output geographies. Population Trends138(1): 38–49.
15.
DenhamJ (2001) Building cohesive communities: A report of the ministerial group on public order and community cohesion, London, UK: Community Cohesion Unit, Home Office.
16.
DubinR (2008) Spatial weights. In: FotheringhamASRogersonPA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis, London: Sage.
17.
DuncanCJonesK (2000) Using multilevel models to model heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis32(4): 279–305.
18.
DuncanODCuzzortRPDuncanB (1961) Statistical Geography: Problems in Analyzing Areal Data, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
19.
ElffersH (2003) Analysing neighbourhood influence in criminology. Statistica Neerlandica57(3): 347–367.
20.
Fielding A and Goldstein H (2006) Cross-classified and multiple membership structures in multilevel models. DES Research Report No. 791. University of Birmingham.
21.
FotheringhamASWongDWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning23(7): 1025–1044.
22.
HaggettP (1965) Scale components in geographical problems. In: HaggettPChorleyRJ (eds) Frontiers in Geographical Teaching, London: Methuen, pp. 164–185.
23.
HarrisR (2017) Measuring the scales of segregation: Looking at the residential separation of White British and other schoolchildren in England using a multilevel index of dissimilarity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(3): 432–444.
24.
HarrisR (2018) Developing a multilevel index of dissimilarity in R with a cases study looking at the changing scales of residential ethnic segregation in England and Wales between 2001 and 2011. Environment and Planning B.
25.
JohnstonRJJonesKManleyDet al.(2016) Macro-scale stability with micro-scale diversity: Modelling changing ethnic minority residential segregation. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS41(4): 389–402.
26.
JonesK (1991) Specifying and estimating multi-level models for geographical research. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS16(2): 148–159.
27.
JonesKGouldMIWattR (1998) Multiple contexts as cross-classified models. Geographical Analysis30(1): 65–93.
JonesKJohnstonRJManleyDet al.(2018) Ethnic and class residential segregation: exploring their intersection-a multilevel analysis of ancestry and occupational class in Sydney. Urban Studies55(6): 1163–1184.
30.
JonesKSubramanianVS (2013) Developing Multilevel Models for Analyzing Contextuality, Heterogeneity and Change using MLwiN Volume 2, University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
31.
JonesKSubramanianVS (2017) Developing Multilevel Models for Analysing Contextuality, Heterogeneity and Change using MLwiN 3.0, Volume 1, University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
32.
KwanMP (2012) The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(5): 958–968.
33.
LeckieGPillingerRJonesKet al.(2012) Multilevel modelling of social segregation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics37(1): 3–30.
34.
LeckieGFrenchRCharltonCet al.(2014) Modeling heterogeneous variance–covariance components in two-level models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics39(5): 307–332.
35.
LeeBAFirebaughGMatthewsSAet al.(2008) Beyond the census tract: Patterns and determinants of racial residential segregation at multiple scales. American Sociological Review73(5): 766–791.
36.
LiBLingsmaHFSteyerbergEWet al.(2011) Logistic random effects regression models: A comparison of statistical packages. BMC Medical Research Methodology11(1): 77.
37.
ManleyDFlowerdewRSteelD (2006) Scales, levels and processes: Studying spatial patterns of British census variables. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems30(2): 143–160.
38.
MartinD (2002) Geography for the 2001 Census in England and Wales. Population Trends108: 7–15.
39.
MazzaAPunzoA (2015) On the upward bias of the dissimilarity index and its corrections. Sociological Methods and Research44(1): 80–107.
40.
McCullochCENeuhausJM (2011) Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter. Statistical Science. 388–402.
NakayaT (2000) An information statistical approach to the modifiable areal unit problem in incidence rate maps. Environment and Planning A32: 91–109.
43.
OmerIBenensonI (2016) Investigating fine-scale residential segregation by means of local spatial statistics. Geography Research Forum22: 41–60.
44.
OpenshawS (1984) The Modifiable Area Unit Problem, Norwich: Geobooks.
45.
OpenshawSTaylorPJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the MAUP. In: WrigleyN (ed.) Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences, London: Pion, pp. 127–144.
46.
ÖsthJMalmbergBAnderssonEK (2014) Analysing segregation using individualised neighbourhoods. In: LloydCDShuttleworthIGWongDW (eds) Socio-Spatial Segregation: Concepts, Processes and Outcomes, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 135–162.
47.
PropperCJonesKBolsterAet al.(2005) Local neighbourhood and mental health: Evidence from the UK. Social Science and Medicine61(10): 2065–2083.
48.
SpiegelhalterDJBestNGCarlinBPet al.(2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B64(4): 583–640.
49.
SpiegelhalterDJBestNGCarlinBPet al.(2014) The deviance information criterion: 12 years on. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B76(3): 485–493.
50.
SubramanianSVDuncanCJonesK (2001) Multilevel perspectives on modelling census data. Environment and Planning A33(3): 399–417.
51.
TranmerMSteelDG (2001) Ignoring a level in a multilevel model: Evidence from UK census data. Environment and Planning A33(5): 941–948.
52.
WongDWS (1996) Aggregation effects in georeferenced data. In: ArlinghausSLGriffithDA (eds) Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics, Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 83–10.
53.
WongDWS (2009) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: FotheringhamASRogersonPA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis, London: SAGE, pp. 105–124.
54.
WrigleyN (1995) Revisiting the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy. In: CliffADGouldPRHoareAGet al.(eds) Diffusing Geography, Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
ZhangWLoganJR (2016) Global neighborhoods: Beyond the multiethnic metropolis. Demography53(6): 1933–1953.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
