Scenic landscapes,visual accessibility and premium values in a single family housing market: A spatial hedonic approach

Abstract

This article uses a hedonic modelling approach to assess the implicit willingness to pay for the visual accessibility of voluntarily protected, privately owned, scenic lands based on single family houses. These lands are perpetually protected to preserve natural, historic, and scenic characteristics. The capitalized house premium was captured using a visual accessibility variable, which was a combined weighted measure of ‘view’ and ‘proximity,’ referred to here as the Gravity Inspired Visibility Index. Both global (adjusted R² = 0.52, AICc = 29,828) and geographically weighted regression models (adjusted R² = 0.59, AICc = 29,729) estimated the price effect but the geographically weighted regression model outperformed the global model. The results from the geographically weighted regression model indicated an average 3.4% price premium on the mean value of homes in the study area. The paper offers a useful framework for evaluating the effect of land protection for planning and real estate purposes. It also offers useful insights for conservation agencies, local governments, professional planners, and real estate professionals for prioritizing land sites with scenic views.

Keywords

Real estate valuation environmental amenities hedonic model geographical information systems spatial analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asabere

Huffman

(1996) Negative and positive impacts of golf course proximity on home prices. Appraisal Journal 64(4): 351–355. .

Bark

Osgood

Colby

et al. (2011) How do homebuyers value different types of green space?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 36(2): 395–415. .

Benson

Hansen

Schwartz

et al. (1997) The influence of Canadian investment on US residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research 13(3): 231–249.

Benson

Hansen

Schwartz

et al. (1998) Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 16(1): 55–73.

Bin

Crawford

Kruse

et al. (2008) Viewscapes and flood hazard: Coastal housing market response to amenities and risk. Land Economics 84(3): 434–448.

Bjorkund

Soderberg

Wilhelmsson

. Wang

Wolverton

(2002) An Investigation of Property Price Studies in Real Estate Valuation Theory, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 67.

Bond

Seiler

(2002) Residential real estate prices: A room with a view. Journal of Real Estate Research 23(1/2): 129–138.

Bourassa

Hoesli

Sun

(2004) What's in a view?. Environment and Planning A 36: 1427–1450.

Bourassa

Hoesli

Sun

(2005) The price of aesthetic externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature 13(2): 165–188.

10.

Brander

Koetse

(2011) The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 92(10): 2763–2773.

11.

Brunsdon

Fotheringham

Charlton

(1996) Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis 28(4): 281–298.

12.

Cho

S-H

Clark

Park

et al. (2009) Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space. Land Economics 85(1): 51–73.

13.

Conroy

Milosch

(2011) An estimation of the coastal premium for residential housing prices in San Diego County. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 42: 211–228.

14.

Conway

Wolch

et al. (2010) A spatial autocorrelation approach for examining the effects of urban greenspace on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 41: 150–169.

15.

Crespo

Regamey

(2013) Local hedonic house-price modelling for urban planners: Advantages of using local regression techniques. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 664–682.

16.

Crompton

(2005) The impact of parks on property values: Empirical evidence from the past two decades in the United States. Managing Leisure 10(4): 203–218.

17.

Fotheringham

Brunsdon

Charlton

(2002) Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

18.

Geoghegan

Lynch

Bucholtz

(2003) Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1): 33–45.

19.

Ham

Loomis

Champ

(2015) Relative economic values of open space provided by national forest and military lands to surrounding communities. Growth and Change 46(1): 81–96.

20.

Hammer

Coughlin

HornIV

(1974) The effect of a large urban park on real estate value. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40(4): 274–277.

21.

Huff

Jenks

(1968) A graphic interpretation of the friction of distance in gravity models. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 58(4): 814–824.

22.

Irwin

Bockstael

(2001) The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 698–704. .

23.

Kadish

Netusil

(2012) Valuing vegetation in an urban watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning 104(1): 59–65. .

24.

Kestens

Thériault

DesRosiers

(2004) The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on single-family house prices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31(4): 539–567.

25.

Lake

Lovett

Bateman

et al. (1998) Modeling environmental influences on property prices in an urban environment. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 22(2): 121–136.

26.

Lake

Lovett

Bateman

et al. (2000) Using GIS and large-scale digital data to implement hedonic pricing studies. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14(6): 521–541.

27.

Lancaster

(1966) A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.

28.

Lansford

Jones

(1995) Marginal price of lake recreation and aesthetics: An hedonic approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27: 212–223.

29.

Saphores

(2012) A spatial hedonic analysis of the value of urban land cover in the multifamily housing market in Los Angeles. Urban Studies 49(12): 2597–2615.

30.

Lin

Xia

Robinson

et al. (2016) Enhanced Huff model for estimating Park and Ride (PnR) catchment areas in Perth, WA. Journal of Transport Geography 54: 336–348. .

31.

Lindsey

Man

Payton

et al. (2004) Property values, recreation values, and urban greenways. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 22(3): 69–90.

32.

Matthews

Yang

(2012) Mapping the results of local statistics: Using geographically weighted regression. Demographic Research 26: 151–166.

33.

Mittal

(2014) Value capitalization effect of protected properties – A comparison of conservation easement with mixed-bag open spaces. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate 6(1): 23–46. .

34.

Mittal

Byahut

(2016) Value capitalization effects of golf courses, waterfronts, parks, open spaces, and green landscapes – A cross disciplinary review. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate 8(1): 32–94.

35.

Mooney

Eisgruber

(2001) The influence of riparian protection measures on residential property values: The case of the Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22(2–3): 273–286.

36.

Nakaya T (2014) GWR4 user manual: Windows application for Geographically Weighted Regression modelling. Available at: https://geodacenter.asu.edu/drupal_files/gwr/GWR4manual.pdf (accessed 2 February 2016).

37.

Netusil

(2005) The effect of environmental zoning and amenities on property values: Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 81(2): 227–246.

38.

Nicholls

Crompton

(2005) The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 37(3): 321.

39.

Office of Federal Housing Enterprise (2009) The House Prices Indexes Quarterly Data. Available at: www.ofheo.gov/hpi_download.aspx (accessed 3 January 2009); www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Downloads/Pages/House-Price-Index-Datasets.aspx#qexe (accessed 19 February 2016).

40.

Orford

(2002) Valuing locational externalities: A GIS and multilevel modelling approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29: 105–127.

41.

Payton

Lindsey

Wilson

et al. (2008) Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(6): 717–736. .

42.

Powe

Garrod

Brunsdon

et al. (1997) Using a geographic information system to estimate a hedonic price model of the benefits of woodland access. Forestry 70(2): 139–149.

43.

Sander

Manson

(2007) Heights and locations of artificial structures in viewshed calculation: How close is close enough?. Landscape and Urban Planning 82: 257–270.

44.

Sander

Polasky

Haight

(2010) The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics 69(8): 1646–1656.

45.

Saphores

(2012) Estimating the value of urban green areas: A hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Landscape and Urban Planning 104(3): 373–387.

46.

Shultz

Schmitz

(2008) View shed analyses to measure the impact of lake views on urban residential properties. The Appraisal Journal 76(3): 224–232.

47.

Shultz

Schmitz

(2009) Augmenting housing sales data to improve hedonic estimates of golf course frontage. Journal of Real Estate Research 31(1): 63–79.

48.

Simons

Saginor

(2006) A meta-analysis of the effect of environmental contamination and positive amenities on residential real estate values. Journal of Real Estate Research 28(1): 71–104.

49.

Sirmans

MacDonald

Macpherson

et al. (2006) The value of housing characteristics: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 33(3): 215–240.

50.

Troy

Grove

(2008) Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning 87: 233–245.

51.

Walls

Kousky

Chu

(2015) Is what you see what you get? The value of natural landscape views. Land Economics 91(1): 1–19.

52.

Wolverton

(1997) Empirical study of the relationship between residential lot price, size and view. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment 15(1): 45–57.

53.

Wright

(1994) Designing and applying conservation easements. Journal of the American Planning Association 60(3): 380–388.

54.

Wyman

Hutchison

Tiwari

(2014) Testing the waters: A spatial econometric pricing model of different waterfront views. Journal of Real Estate Research 36(3): 363–382. .

55.

Xiao

Orford

Webster

(2016) Urban configuration, accessibility, and property prices: A case study of Cardiff, Wales. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43: 108–129.

56.

Yin

Hastings

(2007) Capitalizing on views: Assessing visibility by using 3D visualization and GIS technologies for hotel development in the City of Niagara Falls, New York. Journal of Urban Technology 14(3): 59–82.