The theme issue Departures charts the formative significance of space, spatiality, and geography in the Frankfurt School tradition of critical theory and its political relevance to the present. For Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, and others associated with the first generation of the Institute for Social Research, the spatial experience of displacement, exile, and migration played a crucial role in shaping the orientation of critical thought. And yet, while geographical motifs of negativity, unmooring, and boundary crossing imbue the writings of the Frankfurt School theorists, the actual relationship between space and critical theory has received relatively little scholarly attention. The theme issue develops a robust spatial reading of critical theory by fostering a collective dialogue among scholars across disciplines, drawing on the Frankfurt School tradition to investigate the problem of space in its connection to everyday praxis, critique, and struggles for social transformation.
AdornoTW (1997) Aesthetic Theory. London: The Athlone Press.
2.
AdornoTWHorkheimerM (2011) Towards a New Manifesto. Verso.
3.
AllenA (2016) The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Columbia University Press.
4.
AndreottiLLahijiN (2016) The Architecture of Phantasmagoria: Specters of the City. Routledge.
5.
BachmannVMoisioS (2020) Towards a constructive critical geopolitics – Inspirations from the Frankfurt School of critical theory. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(2): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419869016
6.
BarguB (2024) Disembodiment: Corporeal Politics of Radical Refusal. Oxford University Press.
BissellDRoseMHarrisonP (2021) Negative Geographies: Exploring the Politics of Limits. University of Nebraska Press.
12.
Buck-MorssS (1995) The city as dreamworld and catastrophe. October73(Summer): 3–26.
13.
CallinicosA (2023) The New Age of Catastrophe. Polity Press.
14.
CassegårdC (2021) Toward a Critical Theory of Nature: Capital, Ecology, and Dialectics. Bloomsbury Academic.
15.
CatlinJ (2025) Marcuse’s “catastrophe of liberation” for the Anthropocene. In: SantosEACFastJMayberryNKSimpsonSid (eds). The Marcusean Mind. Routledge, 255–270.
16.
CharnockG (2018) Space, form, and urbanity. In: BestBBonefeldWO’KaneC (eds) The Sage Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. Sage, pp. 1450–1466.
17.
ConroyW (2023) Background check: spatiality and relationality in Nancy Fraser’s expanded conception of capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(5): 1091–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221143118
18.
CrawfordR (2023) A contest over titles: the canonisation of the Frankfurt School as “permanent exiles.”. Radical Philosophy2(15): 39–56.
FörtnerMBelinaBNaumannM (2021) The revenge of the village? The geography of right-wing populist electoral success, anti-politics, and austerity in Germany. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39(3): 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420951803
23.
FosterJBClarkB (2016) Marx’s universal metabolism of nature and the Frankfurt School: dialectical contradictions and critical syntheses. In: OrmrodJS (ed) Changing Our Environment, Changing Ourselves: Nature, Labour, Knowledge and Alienation. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 101–135.
24.
GillochG (1996) Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the City. Polity Press.
25.
HannahMG (2018) Direction and Socio-spatial Theory: A Political Economy of Oriented Practice. Routledge.
26.
HorkheimerM (1989) The state of contemporary social philosophy and the tasks of an institute for social research. In: BronnerSEKellnerDM (eds) Critical Theory and Society. Routledge, pp. 25–36.
27.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford University Press.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Blackwell.
32.
LeslieE (2007) Kracauer’s Weimar geometry and geomancy. New Formations61(1): 34–48.
33.
MarascoR (2017) Critical theory and the pursuit of a political education. Theory & Event20(3): 756–768.
34.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. Sage.
35.
O’KaneC (2018) “Society maintains itself despite all the catastrophes that may eventuate”: critical theory, negative totality, and crisis. Constellations25(2): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12341
36.
PhiloC (2021) Nothing-much geographies, or towards micrological investigations. Geographische Zeitschrift109(2–3): 73–95. https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2021-0006
37.
PhiloC (2025) Adorno and the Antifascist Geographical Imagination. Edinburgh University Press.
RitivoiAD (2014) Intimate Strangers: Arendt, Marcuse, Solzhenitsyn, and Said in American Political Discourse. Columbia University Press.
40.
SavageM (1995) Walter Benjamin’s urban thought: a critical analysis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13(2): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130201
41.
SmithN (2008) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. University of Georgia Press.
42.
SojaEW (1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Verso.
43.
SojaEW (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press.
44.
ThompsonMJ (2016) The Domestication of Critical Theory. Rowman and Littlefield.
45.
TombaM (2019) Insurgent Universality: An Alternative Legacy of Modernity. Oxford University Press.
46.
Vázquez-ArroyoAY (2025) “After Frankfurt”: sedimentations, colonialism, and critical theory. New German Critique52(2): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-11793062
47.
VidlerA (1991) Agoraphobia: spatial estrangement in Georg Simmel and Siegfried Kracauer. New German Critique54: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/488425
48.
WaggonerM (2018) Unhoused: Adorno and the Problem of Dwelling. Columbia University Press.
49.
WalkerMA (2022) Spatializing Marcuse: Critical Theory for Contemporary Times. Bristol University Press.
