This paper draws on interview data from a longitudinal project to examine the role of digital technologies to both harm and support survivors of domestic violence living in the island communities of Washington’s Puget Sound and Salish Sea region. Using a feminist geographic analytic, we highlight two distinct manifestations of technology-enabled coercive control (TECC) that rely on mundane technologies and the unique socio-spatial norms of the island communities that were part of our study. We also detail the geography-specific challenges that emerge for survivors as they navigate support resources for TECC and the way that digital technologies have emerged as tools for engaging support and protection in island communities. The findings from this project advance a feminist relational approach to understanding the multiple entanglements between and across material/virtual space, mainland/island geographies and physical/digital violence to examine the tactics that abusers utilize and the experiences of survivors seeking support and protection. We argue that examining the techno-socio-spatial entanglements of TECC allows us to better understand the nuanced and specific ways in which abusers simultaneously use digital technologies, place-based social norms, and geography to engage in coercive control.
AfrouzR (2021) The nature, patterns and consequences of technology-facilitated domestic abuse: a scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse24(2): 913–927.
2.
BancroftL (2003) Why Does He Do that? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Penguin.
3.
BelliniR (2023) Paying the price: when intimate partners use technology for financial harm. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘23). Association for Computing Machinery, 1–17.
4.
BelliniRETsengEMcDonaldN, et al. (2020) “So-called privacy breeds evil”: narrative justifications for intimate partner surveillance in online forums. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4(CSCW3): 1–27.
5.
BoethiusSÅkerströmMHydénM (2022) The double-edged sword – abused women’s experiences of digital technology. European Journal of Social Work26(3): 506–518.
6.
Bonner-ThompsonCMcDowellL (2021) Digital geographies of austerity: young men’s material, affective and everyday relationships with the digital. Geforum120: 113–121.
7.
Bork-HüfferTMahlknechtBKaufmannK (2020) (Cyber)bullying in schools – when bullying stretches across cON/OFFlating spaces. Children's Geographies19(2): 241–253.
8.
BowsteadJ (2017) Women on the move: theorising the geographies of domestic violence journeys in England. Gender, Place & Culture24(1): 108–121.
9.
BrickellK (2015) Towards intimate geographies of peace? Local reconciliation of domestic violence in Cambodia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40(3): 321–333.
ChandlerDPughJ (2018) Islands of relationality and resilience: the shifting stakes of the Anthropocene. Area52: 65–72.
12.
CockayneDRichardsonL (2020) Digital feminism. In: KobayashiA (ed) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, 329–333.
13.
CuomoDDolciN (2021) New tools, old abuse: technology-enabled coercive control (TECC). Geoforum126: 224–232.
14.
CuomoDDolciN (2022a) The entanglements of the law, digital technologies and domestic violence in Seattle. Gender, Place & Culture30(7): 903–923.
15.
CuomoDDolciN (2022b) The TECC clinic: an innovative resource for mitigating technology-enabled coercive control. Women's Studies International Forum92: 102596.
16.
CuomoDMassaroVA (2016) Boundary-making in feminist research: new methodologies for “Intimate Insiders”. Gender, Place & Culture23(1): 94–106.
17.
DávalosCZaragocínS (2022) Island feminism meets feminist geopolitics: the spatial dynamics of gender-based violence in the Galapagos islands. Area54: 313–321.
18.
ElwoodS (2020) Digital geographies, feminist relationality, black and queer code studies: thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography45: 209–228.
19.
ElwoodSLeszczynskiA (2018) Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture25(5): 616–629.
20.
FreedDPalmerJMinchalaD, et al. (2018) “A stalker’s paradise”: how intimate partner abusers exploit technology. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), New York, NY, USA, 21-26 April 2018, 1–13.
21.
GainiFPristed NielsonH (2020) Gender and Island Communities. Routledge.
22.
GrydehøjA (2019) Critical approaches to island geography. Area52(1): 2–5.
23.
GrydehøjACasagrandeM (2019) Islands of connectivity: archipelago relationality and transport infrastructure in Venice lagoon. Area52(1): 56–64.
24.
HarrisB (2018) Spacelessness, spatiality and intimate partner violence: technology-facilitated abuse, stalking and justice. In: Fitz-GibbonKWalklateSMcCullochJ, et al. (eds) Intimate Partner Violence, Risk and Security: Securing Women’s Lives in a Global World. Routledge, 52–70.
25.
HarrisBWoodlockD (2022) Spaceless violence: women’s experiences of technology-facilitated domestic violence in regional, rural and remote areas. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice644: 1–14.
26.
JeffersonBJ (2017) Digitize and punish: computerized crime mapping and racialized carceral power in Chicago. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(5): 775–796.
27.
KaridesM (2017) Why island feminism?Shima11(1): 30–39.
28.
KindonSPainRKesbyK (2007) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge.
29.
KinsleyS (2014) The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography38(3): 364–384.
30.
KoukopoulosNJanickyjMTanczerLM (2025) Defining and conceptualizing technology facilitated abuse (“tech abuse”): findings of a global Delphi study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence41: 249–275.
31.
LeszczynskiAElwoodS (2015) Feminist geographies of new spatial media. Canadian Geographer59(1): 12–28.
32.
LittleJ (2017) Understanding domestic violence in rural spaces. Progress in Human Geography41: 472–488.
33.
LonghurstR (2013) Using Skype to mother: bodies, emotions, visuality, and screens. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31: 664–679.
34.
MaalsenS (2023) Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges. Progress in Human Geography47(2): 197–214.
35.
MaalsenS (2024) Digital geographies 1: reality bytes. Progress in Human Geography48(6): 912–921.
36.
McLeanJMaalsenS (2021) Geographies of digital storytelling: care and harm in a pandemic. In: COVID-19 and Similar Futures: Pandemic Geographies. Springer International Publishing, 199–205.
37.
MottCCockayneD (2020) Understanding how hatred persists: situating digital harassment in the long history of white supremacy. Gender, Place & Culture28(11): 1521–1540.
38.
PainR (2014) Everyday terrorism: connecting domestic violence and global terrorism. Progress in Human Geography38: 531–550.
39.
PainRStaeheliL (2014) Introduction: intimacy, geopolitics and violence. Area46(4): 344–347.
40.
PedersenSMueller-HirthNMillerL (2023) Supporting victims of domestic violence in rural and island communities during COVID-19: the impact of the pandemic on service providers in North East Scotland and Orkney. Island Studies Journal18(2): 1–21.
41.
PughJ (2016) The relational turn in island geographies: bringing together island, sea and ship relations and the case of the landship. Social & Cultural Geography17: 1040–1059.
42.
RichardsonL (2018) Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 244–263.
43.
RishworthAKingBHolmesLM (2024) Digital geographies of care: telehealth landscapes of addiction treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health & Place89: e103296.
44.
ShulruffT (2022) Gender-based violence enabled by location technologies. International Journal of Geographical Information Science36(12): 2345–2351.
45.
SouhamiA (2022) Weather, light and darkness in remote island policing: expanding the horizons of the criminological imagination. British Journal of Criminology63(3): 634–650.
46.
StarkE (2007) Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Oxford University Press.
47.
TanczerLMLópez-NeiraIParkinS (2021) I feel like we’re really behind the game’: perspectives of the United Kingdom’s intimate partner violence support sector on the rise of technology-facilitated abuse. Journal of Gender-Based Violence5(3): 431–450.
