Most local authorities deploy exclusionary regulations towards informal street vending, while recent studies suggest that some cities also adopt inclusive policies. This paper examines the case of Puyang City in China, revealing that street-level bureaucrats utilize affective governance techniques to balance these opposing regulatory approaches. The diverse future routines of affective governance—such as “uncertainty,” “hope,” and “waiting”—primarily focus on the tension between the actual and the virtual. Drawing on observations, interviews in Puyang, and critical discourse analyses of relevant official documents and news reports, I examine the affective tactics—“designed surprise”—to uncover the ambiguous governance strategies employed by street-level bureaucrats in navigating the tension between exclusionary regulations and inclusive policies. The interruptions that occur between the actual and the virtual, manifested as “surprise” allow us to enrich the understanding of temporal structure by exploring the directional interplay between pastnesses and the future. My study contributes to the politics of temporality by exploring the coexistence of multiple temporalities.
AdeyPAndersonB (2011) Anticipation, materiality, event: the Icelandic ash cloud disruption and the security of mobility. Mobilities6: 11–20.
2.
AhmedS (2014) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
3.
AndersonB (2006) Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 733–752.
4.
AndersonB (2010) Preemption, precaution, preparedness: anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 777–798.
5.
AndersonB (2018) Affective materialism. Dialogues in Human Geography8: 229–231.
6.
AndersonB (2021) Affect and critique: a politics of boredom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39(2): 197–217.
7.
AndersonB (2023) Boredom and the politics of climate change. Scottish Geographical Journal139(1-2): 133–141.
8.
AndersonBFentonJ (2008) Editorial introduction: spaces of hope. Space and Culture11(2): 76–80.
9.
AndersonBHoldenA (2008) Affective urbanism and the event of hope. Space and Culture11: 142–159.
10.
AyDPenpeciogluM (2023) Politics of “waiting for transformation” in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space42: 1026–1044.
11.
CarswellGChambersTDe NeveG (2019) Waiting for the state: gender, citizenship and everyday encounters with bureaucracy in India. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space37(4): 597–616.
12.
ChakkalakalSRenJ (2022) Un/doing future, unsettling temporalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research46(5): 845–850.
13.
CuviJ (2019) The peddlers’ aristocracy: social closure, path-dependence, and street vendors in São Paulo. Qualitative Sociology42: 117–138.
14.
DawneyL (2013) The interruption: investigating subjectivation and affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31: 628–644.
15.
DonovanMG (2008) Informal cities and the contestation of public space: the case of Bogotá's street vendors, 1988—2003. Urban Studies45(1): 29–51.
16.
DuboisV (2012) The Bureaucrat and the Poor Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Routledge.
17.
GuoWEDongBPalmatierRW (2025) Understanding surprise: toward a theory of surprise marketing. Journal of Retailing101: 7–24.
18.
HanZ (2008) The action logic and responsibility control of the street-level-bureaucrat. Journal of Public Management1: 121–122.
19.
HanZZhangZ (2020) How is cooperation structured? — Technical analysis centered on urban management law enforcement. Public Administration and Policy Review5: 19–31.
20.
HuangGXueDLiZ (2014) From revanchism to ambivalence: the changing politics of street vending in Guangzhou. Antipode46(1): 170–189.
21.
JakimowT (2020) The familiar face of the state: affect, emotion and citizen entitlements in Dehradun, India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(3): 429–446.
22.
JinYZhaoY (2022) The informal constitution of state centrality: governing street businesses in (post‐) pandemic Chengdu, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research46(4): 631–650.
23.
JohannessenLE (2019) Negotiated discretion: redressing the neglect of negotiation in “Street‐Level Bureaucracy”. Symbolic Interaction42(4): 513–538.
24.
JonesVJ (2022) Feeling in suspension: waiting in COVID-19 shopping queues. GeoHumanities8(2): 537–554.
25.
KaufmanJ (2020) Intensity, moderation, and the pressures of expectation: calculation and coercion in the street‐level practice of welfare conditionality. Social Policy and Administration54(2): 205–218.
26.
KistlerMGnassounouB (2007) Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
27.
KnoxH (2017) Affective infrastructures and the political imagination. Public Culture29: 363–384.
28.
KovachevaANikolovaHLambertonC (2022) Will he buy a surprise? Gender differences in the purchase of surprise offerings. Journal of Retailing98(4): 667–684.
29.
LaveeECohenN (2019) How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: the case of urban renewal. Governance32: 475–492.
30.
LipskyM (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
LoewensteinG (1994) The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin116(1): 75–98.
32.
LyonsMSnoxellS (2005) Creating urban social capital: some evidence from informal traders in Nairobi. Urban Studies42(7): 1077–1097.
33.
MassumiB (1995) The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique(31): 83–109.
34.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
35.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoMC (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. University of Michigan Press.
36.
MusahAUmarFYakubuKN, et al. (2020) Assessing the impacts of various street-level characteristics on the burden of urban burglary in Kaduna, Nigeria. Applied Geography114: 102–126.
37.
NewlandSALiuJC (2021) Ethnic identity and local government responsiveness in Taiwan. Governance34(3): 875–892.
38.
NguyenTVelayuthamS (2018) Street‐level discretion, emotional labour and welfare frontline staff at the Australian employment service providers. Australian Journal of Social Issues53(2): 158–172.
39.
NogueiraM (2021) The ambiguous labour of hope: affective governance and the struggles of displaced street vendors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39: 863–879.
40.
OberfieldZW (2014) Becoming Bureaucrats: Socialization at the Front Lines of Government Service. University of Pennsylvania Press.
41.
OnodugoVAEzeadichieNHOnwunemeCA, et al. (2016) The dilemma of managing the challenges of street vending in public spaces: the case of Enugu city, Nigeria. Cities59: 95–101.
42.
PykettJJuppESmithF (2016) Introduction: governing with feeling. In: PykettJJuppESmithF (eds) Emotional States: Sites and Spaces of Affective Governance. Taylor & Francis Group, 1–17.
43.
RecchiS (2021) Informal street vending: a comparative literature review. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy41(7/8): 805–825.
44.
ReichleLR (2023) Between depression and hope: affective mediations of urban restructuring in Leipzig, East Germany. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research47(4): 546–562.
45.
ResnickDSivasubramanianBIdiongIC, et al. (2022) The enabling environment for informal food traders in Nigeria’s secondary cities. In: Transforming Urban Food Systems in Secondary Cities in Africa. Springer International Publishing, 103–131.
46.
ReyesRM (2013) Crime, street vendors and the historical downtown in post-Giuliani Mexico City. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology2: 186–198.
47.
RogersonCM (2016) Progressive rhetoric, ambiguous policy pathways: street trading in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit31(1-2): 204–218.
48.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.
49.
SchindlerS (2014) Producing and contesting the formal/informal divide: regulating street hawking in Delhi, India. Urban Studies51(12): 2596–2612.
50.
SimandanD (2020) Being surprised and surprising ourselves: a geography of personal and social change. Progress in Human Geography44(1): 99–118.
51.
SlovicPFinucaneMLPetersE, et al. (2013) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. In: The Feeling of Risk. Routledge, 21–36.
52.
SunFWangL (2021) The moral dilemmas of street-level bureaucrats: a literature review. Public Administration and Policy Review3: 158–168.
53.
SwansonK (2007) Revanchist urbanism heads south: the regulation of indigenous beggars and street vendors in Ecuador. Antipode39(4): 708–728.
54.
ThriftN (2004) Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography86(1): 57–78.
55.
TuckerJL (2017) Affect and the dialectics of uncertainty: governing a Paraguayan frontier town. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(4): 733–751.
56.
TuckerJLDevlinRT (2019) Uncertainty and the governance of street vending: a critical comparison across the North/South divide. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(3): 460–475.
57.
WangCM (2023) Governing the rural futures: anxiety machine, anticipatory actions and rural affective politics. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space41(7): 1407–1423.
58.
Watkins-HayesC (2009) The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. University of Chicago Press.
59.
WilkinsonSKitzingerC (2006) Surprise as an interactional achievement: reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly69(2): 150–182.
60.
WoodwardA (2009) Engaging frontline workers in times of organizational change. Public Administration Review69(1): 25–28.
61.
ZackaB (2017) When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
