The article offers a critical analysis of the United Nations 2030 Global Development Agenda, whose stated aim is to "transform the world" in such a way that no one is left behind. Drawing on post-Marxist theory, we argue that the 2030 Global Development Agenda is a fantasmatic narrative seeking to conceal the conflictual causes and the antagonistic origins of global development and sustainability issues. Within this fantasmatic narrative, ‘sustainable development’ is the empty signifier that articulates and sustains the agenda’s discourse. Our analysis of the ontological assumptions underpinning the documents that frame the agenda shows that, rather than transforming, the agenda naturalizes and consolidates the existing status quo: a status quo that has created (and continues to perpetuate) the global problems that the agenda aims to solve.
AdelmanS (2017) The sustainable development goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In: FrenchDKotzéL (eds) Global Goals: Law, Theory and Implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 15–40.
2.
BaylissKvan WaeyenbergeE (2018) Unpacking the public private partnership revival. The Journal of Development Studies54(4): 577–593.
3.
BerndtCH (2015) Behavioural economics, experimentalism and the marketization of development. Economy and Society44(4): 567–591.
4.
BexellMJönssonK (2017) Responsibility and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Forum for Development Studies44(1): 13–29.
5.
BrownT (2016) Sustainability as empty signifier: Its rise, fall, and radical potential. Antipode48(1): 115–133.
CarrollTJarvisDSL (2015) The new politics of development: Citizens, civil society, and the evolution of Neoliberal Development Policy.Globalizations12(3): 281–304.
8.
CooperRNCramtonPEdenhoferO, et al. (2017) Why Paris did not solve the climate dilemma. In: CramtonPMacKayDJCOckenfelsA, et al. (eds) Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.1–7.
9.
CritchleySMarchartO (2004) Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge.
10.
DavidsonM (2010) Sustainability as ideological praxis: The acting out of planning’s mater signifier. City14(4): 390–405.
11.
de CleenBGlynosJ (2021) Beyond populism studies. Journal of Language and Politics20(1): 178–195.
12.
DenkA (2016) Sustainable development goals. An (alternative) future scenario. Transcience7(1): 47–50.
13.
FletcherRRammeltC (2017) Decoupling: A key fantasy of the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Globalizations14(3): 450–467.
14.
Fukuda-ParrS (2016) From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development24(1): 1–10.
15.
Garcia-AriasJ (2015) International financialization and the systemic approach to international financing for development. Global Policy6(1): 24–33.
16.
Garcia-AriasJMaciasAFernandez-HuergaE (2014) Innovative financing for development: A deus ex machina for funding post-2015 development agenda?Revista de Economía Mundial36: 49–70.
17.
GerasN (1987) Post-Marxism?New Left Review163: 40–82.
18.
GerasN (1990) Discourses of Extremity: Radical Ethics and Post-Marxist Extravagances. London: Verso.
19.
GlynosJ (2021) Critical fantasy studies. Journal of Language and Politics20(1): 95–111.
20.
GlynosJHowarthD (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
21.
GlynosJHowarthDFlitcroftR, et al. (2021) Logics, discourse theory and methods: Advances. Journal of Language and Politics20(1): 62–78.
22.
GlynosJHowarthDNorvalA, et al. (2009) Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods. London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review.
23.
GunderM (2006) Sustainability: Planning’s saving grace or road to perdition?Journal of Planning Education and Research26(2): 208–221.
24.
HickelJ (2019) The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development27(5): 873–884.
25.
HowarthD (2000) Discourse. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
26.
HowarthD (2013) Poststructuralism and After. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
27.
HowarthD (2015) Ernesto Laclau. Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique. London: Routledge.
28.
KunzRMaisenbacherJPaudelLN (2020) The financialization of remittances: Governing through emotions. Review of International Political Economy. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1785923
29.
KedirAElhiraikaAChinzaraZ, et al. (2017) Growth and development finance required for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Africa. African Development Review29(S1): 15–26.
30.
KoehlerG (2016) Assessing the SDGs from the standpoint of eco-social policy: Using the SDGs subversively. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy32(2): 149–164.
LaclauE (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
33.
LaclauE (1996) Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
34.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso
35.
LaclauEMouffeC (2014) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
36.
LangfordM (2016) Lost in transformation? The politics of the sustainable development goals. Ethics & International Affairs30(2): 167–176.
37.
LuebkerM (2017) Poverty, employment and inequality in the SDGs: Heterodox discourse, orthodox policies? International Institute of Social Sciences Working Papers, no. 626. International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
38.
Macharia K, Chasek P and O’Connor D (2018) Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy. The Inside Story of the Sustainable Development Goals. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
39.
MarchartO (2007) Post-Foundational Political Thought. Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
40.
MarchartO (2018) Thinking Antagonism. Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
41.
MediavillaJGarcia-AriasJ (2019) Philanthrocapitalism as a neoliberal (development agenda) artefact: Philanthropic discourse and hegemony in (financing for) international development. Globalizations16(6): 857–875.
42.
MertA (2015) Environmental Governance through Partnerships. A Discourse Theoretical Study. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, UK.
43.
Methmann C, Rothe D and Stephan B (eds.) (2013) Interpretive Approaches to Global Climate Governance. (De)Constructing the Greenhouse. Routledge: Oxon, UK.
44.
NicolaiSHoyCBerlinerT, et al. (2015), Projecting Progress. Reaching the SDGs by 2030. London: Overseas Development Institute.
45.
NietoJCarpinteroOMiguelLJ (2018) Less than 2°C? An Economic-Environmental evaluation of the Paris agreement. Ecological Economics146: 69–84.
46.
ParriqueTBarthJBriensF, et al. (2019). Decoupling Debunked: Evidence and Arguments against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability. Brussels: European Environmental Bureau.
47.
RafteryAZimmerAFriersonD, et al. (2017) Less than 2°C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nature Climate Change7(9): 637–641.
48.
RemlingE (2018) Depoliticizing adaptation: A critical analysis of EU climate adaptation policy. Environmental Politics27(3): 477–497.
49.
SachsW (2017) The sustainable development goals and Laudato si’: Varieties of post-development?Third World Quarterly38(12): 2573–2587.
50.
ScheyvensRBanksGHughesE (2016) The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustainable Development24(6): 371–382.
51.
SexsmithKMcmichaelP (2015) Formulating the SDGs: Reproducing or reimagining state-centered development?Globalizations12(4): 581–596.
52.
SoederbergS (2017) Universal access to affordable housing? Interrogating an elusive development goal. Globalizations14(3): 343–359.
53.
SpannM (2017) Politics of poverty: The post-2015 sustainable development goals and the business of agriculture. Globalizations14(3): 360–378.
54.
SpashCL (2016) This changes nothing: The Paris agreement to ignore reality. Globalizations13(6): 928–933.
55.
StokkeO (2009) The UN and Development. From Aid to Cooperation, United Nations Intellectual History Project Series. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
56.
TelleriaJ (2018) Can we ‘transform our world’ without affecting international power relations? A political analysis of the United Nations development agenda. Globalizations15(5): 655–669.
57.
TelleriaJ (2019) Policies without politics. In: KoehlerGCimadamoreADKiwanF, et al. (eds) The Politics of Social Inclusion. Bridging Knowledge and Policies towards Social Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 99–114.
58.
TelleriaJ (2020) Deconstructing Human Development. From the Washington Consensus to the 2030 Agenda. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
59.
UN (2015a) Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution A/RES/70/1, adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations.
60.
UN (2015b) Addis Ababa Action Agenda. Resolution A/RES/69/313 adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2015. In: Third International conference on financing for development. New York: United Nation, 1–68.
61.
UN (2019) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. New York: United Nations.
62.
UNFCCC (2016) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. UN Doc FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. (29 January 2016) Decision 1/CP.21, annex ('Paris Agreement').
63.
von StechowCMinxJRiahiK, et al. (2016) 2°C and SDGs: United they stand, divided they fall?Environmental Research Letters11: 1–16.
64.
WardJDSuttonPCWernerAD, et al. (2016) Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible?PLoS One11(10): e0164733.
65.
WeberH (2017) Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 sustainable development goals agenda. Globalizations14(3): 399–394.
