Counter-hegemonic struggle and the framing practices of the anti-nuclear platform in Turkey (2002

Abstract

Since winning its first electoral victory in 2002, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has promoted nuclear energy as crucial for satisfying rising energy needs, triggering economic development and increasing competitiveness of Turkey. This hegemonic discourse has been challenged by the anti-nuclear platform (ANP) that has framed nuclear energy as posing a threat to human life and the nature. Based on an engagement between the framing perspective and the Gramscian approach, this study considers the framing activities of the ANP as a counter-hegemonic strategy to challenge the hegemonic discourses articulated by AKP on nuclear energy over the past 15 years. Analyzing the data from primary sources, such as reports, bulletins, pamphlets, and press releases produced by the ANP and interviews with ANP representatives, this study reveals the ways the platform exercises power through their framing practices and counter-hegemonic discourses to delegitimize the official frame promoting nuclear energy in Turkey.

Keywords

Counter-hegemony framing authoritarian neoliberal space anti-nuclear platform Turkey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adaman

Akbulut

Arsel

(2017) Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdogan. London: I.B. Tauris.

Adaman

Arsel

Akbulut

(2019) Neoliberal developmentalism, authoritarian populism, and extractivism in the countryside: The Soma mining disaster in Turkey. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46(3): 514–536.

Akbulut

Adaman

Arsel

(2017) The radioactive inertia: Deciphering Turkey’s anti-nuclear movement. In: Adaman

Akbulut

Arsel M (eds) Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdogan. London: I.B.Tauris, pp. 175–189.

Andrée

(2011) Civil society and the political economy of GMO failure in Canada: A neo-Gramscian analysis. Environmental Politics 20(2): 173–191.

Anti-Nuclear Platform (ANP) (2017a) İnsanlığın geleceği için nükleere hayır! 11 March. Available at: http://portal.nukleerkarsitiplatform.org/insanligin-gelecegi-icin-nukleere-hayir (accessed 20 March 2018).

ANP (2017b) Çernobil 31.yılında unutma! 26 April. Available at: http://portal.nukleerkarsitiplatform.org/cernobil-31-yilinda-unutma/(accessed 30 April 2018).

Arrighi

Hopkins

Immanuel

(1989) Anti-Systemic Movements. New York, NY: Verso.

Arsel

(2005) The Bergama imbroglio. In: Adaman

Arsel

(eds) Environmentalism in Turkey: Between Democracy and Development?. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 263–276.

Arsel

Akbulut

Adaman

(2015) Environmentalism of the malcontent: Anatomy of an anti-coal power plant struggle in Turkey. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42(2): 371–395.

10.

Aydın

(2019) Identifiying ecological conflicts around the inter-regional flow of energy in Turkey: A mapping exercise. Frontiers in Energy Research 7(33): 1–19.

11.

Aydın CI (2020) Nuclear energy debate in Turkey: Stakeholders, policy alternatives, and governance issues. Energy Policy 136: 1--17.

12.

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 611–639.

13.

Bernardi

Morales

Lühiste

, et al. (2018) The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: A two-step comparative examination. Environmental Politics 27(1): 42–68.

14.

Bianet (2008) Opposition to nuclear energy raising its voice. 13 February. Available at: http://bianet.org/bianet/science/104883-opposition-to-nuclear-energy-raising-its-voice (accessed 6 January 2018).

15.

Bilgiç

(2018) Reclaiming the national will: Resilience of Turkish authoritarian neoliberalism after Gezi. South European Society and Politics 23(2): 259–280.

16.

Carragee

Roefs

(2004) The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication 54(2): 214–233.

17.

Carroll

(2010) Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony: In search of the new. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 2(2): 168–198.

18.

Carroll

Ratner

(1996) Master frames and counter-hegemony: Political sensibilities in the new social movements. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 33(4): 407–435.

19.

Chamber of Electrical Engineers (EMO) (2013) Nükleer Enerji Raporu [Nuclear Energy Report]. Ankara. Available at: http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/d28ac2cf3783f23_ek.pdf.(accessed 17 January 2018).

20.

Chamber of Electrical Engineers (EMO) (2016) Nükleer Enerji Raporu II [Nuclear Energy Report II]. Ankara. Available at: http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/ec9abf11f8841ad_ek.pdf (accessed 17 January 2018).

21.

Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center (CNIC) (2014) Report from Turkey Sinop says no to nuclear info Tokyo no.159, 30 March. Available at: http://www.cnic.jp/english/?p=2895 (accessed 12. February 2018).

22.

Ecology Collective (2008) Ekoloji kolektifi bülteni. no. 3. Available at: http://ekolojikolektifi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/kolektifdergi_03.pdf (accessed 12 March 2018).

23.

Ecology Collective (2011) Kolektif: Ekososyalist dergi. no. 9. Available at: http://ekolojikolektifi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/kolektifdergi_09.pdf (accessed 12 March 2018).

24.

Erdem

(2011) Emek ve doğa için birleşik mücadele. Kolektif: Ekososyalist Dergisi 9: 3–5. Available at: http://ekolojikolektifi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/kolektifdergi_09.pdf (accessed 14 March 2018).

25.

Erensü

(2016) Fragile Energy: Power, Nature, and the Politics of Infrastructure in the ‘New Turkey’. PhD Thesis. University of Minnesota, USA.

26.

Eschle

(2018) Nuclear (in)security in the everyday: Peace campers as everyday security practitioners. Security Dialogue 49(4): 289–305.

27.

Featherstone

(2003) Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: The maps of grievance of the Inter-Continental caravan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28(4): 404–421.

28.

Gamson

Wolfsfeld

(1993) Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528(1): 114–125.

29.

Gramsci

(1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

30.

Gürbüz

(2017) Sinop’ta hayırlı miting. Portal.nukleerkarsitiplatform.org. Available at: http://portal.nukleerkarsitiplatform.org/sinopta-hayirli-miting (accessed 10 December 2018).

31.

Hetland

Goodwin

(2013) The strange disappearance of capitalism from social movement studies. In: Laurence

Cox

Nilsen

(eds) Marxism and Social Movements. Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 83–102.

32.

Hürriyet (2011) Kadıköy’de nükleer karşıtı miting. 24 April. Available at: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kadikoyde-nukleer-karsiti-miting-17626754 (accessed 19 February 2018).

33.

İşeri

Günay

Almaz

(2018) Contending narratives on the sustainability of nuclear energy in Turkey. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(1): 160–177.

34.

Jessop

(2005) Gramsci as a spatial theorist. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(4): 421–437.

35.

Kadirbeyoğlu

Adaman

Özkaynak

, et al. (2017) The effectiveness of environmental civil society organizations: An integrated analysis of organizational characteristics and contextual factors. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28(4): 1717–1741.

36.

Karriem

(2009) The rise and transformation of the Brazilian landless movement into a counter-hegemonic political actor: A Gramscian analysis. Geoforum 40(3): 316–325.

37.

Kitschelt

(1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 57–85.

38.

Kökkılıç

Aksakoğlu

(2007) Nükleer karşıtı platform deneyimi Dr . Ümit Şahin. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi. Konferans Yazıları. no. 6.

39.

Künar

(2002) Don Kişotlar Akkuyu’ya Karşı: Anti-Nükleer Hikayeler. Ankara: Elektrik Mühendisleri Odası.

40.

Kurtz

(2003) Scale frames and counter‐scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental justice. Political Geography 22(8): 887–916.

41.

Leitner

Sheppard

Sziarto

(2008) The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33(2): 157–172.

42.

Malin

(2015) The Price of Nuclear Power: Uranium Communities and Environmental Justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

43.

Malin

Alexis-Martin

(2020) Embedding the atom: Pro-neoliberal activism, Polanyi, and sites of acceptance in American uranium communities. The Extractive Industries and Society 7(2): 535–543.

44.

Martin

Miller

(2003) Space and contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 8(2): 143–156.

45.

Miller

Martin

(2000) Missing geography? Social movements on the head of a pin. In: B Miller (ed.) Geography and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–38.

46.

Moen

(1998) Analysis of social transformative movements in advanced capitalism: A neo-Gramscian approach. Journal of Policy and Culture 3: 117–133.

47.

Noakes

(2005) Official frames in social movement theory: The FBI, HUAC, and the communist threat in hollywood. In: H. Johnston H and Noakes JH (eds) Frames of Protest. Lanham: Rowmann & Littlefield, pp. 89–111.

48.

Noakes

Johnston

(2005) Frames of protest: A road map to a perspective. In: Johnston

Noakes JH (eds) Frames of Protest. Lanham: Rowmann & Littlefield, pp. 1–29.

49.

Öniş

(1998) State and Market: The Political Economy of Turkey in Comparative Perspective. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.

50.

Özen

(2009) Located locally, disseminated nationally: The Bergama movement. Environmental Politics 18(3): 408–423.

51.

Paker

(2017) The ‘politics of serving’ and neoliberal developmentalism: The megaprojects of the AKP as tools of hegemony building. In: Adaman F, Akbulut B, and Arsel M (eds) Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdogan. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 119–129.

52.

Routledge

(2003) Convergence space: Process geographies of grassroots globalisation networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28(3): 333–349.

53.

Rucht

(1990) Campaigns, skirmishes and battles: Anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and west Germany. Industrial Crisis Quarterly 4(3): 193–222.

54.

Snow

Benford

(1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1: 197–217.

55.

Snow

Benford

(1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. In: Morris

Mueller

(eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 133–155.

56.

Snow

Rochford

Worden

, et al. (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51(4): 464–481.

57.

Swidler

(1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51(2): 273–286.

58.

Tansel

(2018) Authoritarian neoliberalism and democratic backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the narratives of progress. South European Society and Politics 23(2): 197–217.

59.

Tansel

(2019) Reproducing authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey: Urban governance and state restructuring in the shadow of executive centralization. Globalizations 16(3): 320–335.

60.

Tarrow

(1992) Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: Constructing meanings through action. In: Morris AD and Mueller CM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 174–202.

61.

Temocin

(2018) Framing opposition to nuclear power: The case of Akkuyu in southeast Turkey. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 6(2): 353–377.

62.

Türk Mühendis ve Odalar Birliği (TMMOB) (2016) TMMOB press release TMMOB’den dünya enerji kongresi’ne tepki. Birlik Haberleri 170: 14.

63.

TMMOB (2008a) Saldırı küresel, direnişimiz de! Birlik Haberleri 118: 9–10.

64.

TMMOB (2008b) Nükleer santral macerasından bir an önce vazgeçilmeli, nükleer santral ihalesi iptal edilmelidir. Birlik Haberleri 122: 12.

65.

Tünay

(1993) The Turkish new right’s attempt at hegemony. In: Eralp A, Tünay M and Yeşilada B (eds) The Political and Socioeconomic Transformation of Turkey. London: Praeger, pp. 11–31.

66.

Yalman

(2002) The Turkish state and bourgeoisie in historical perspective: A relativist paradigm or a panoply of hegemonic strategies?. In: Balkan N and Savran S. (eds) The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey. New York, NY: Nova Science, pp. 21–54.

67.

Yaşın

(2019) Contextualizing the rise of environmental movements in Turkey: Two instances of anti-gold mining resistance. In: İnal O and Turhan E (eds) Transforming Socia-Natures in Turkey Landsacapes, State and Environmental Movements. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 137–165.

68.

Yeldan

Ünüvar

(2015) An assessment of the Turkish economy in the AKP era. Research and policy on Turkey. Available at: http://yoksis.bilkent.edu.tr/pdf/files/12116.pdf (accessed 20 February 2020).

Counter-hegemonic struggle and the framing practices of the anti-nuclear platform in Turkey (2002–2018)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References