Examining regional competitiveness and the pressures of rapid growth: An interpretive institutionalist account of policy responses in three city regions

Abstract

This paper is premised on the notion that actors play a central role in shaping their institutional contexts. The paper adds to scholarship in this area by bringing together three disparate cases with a common analytical entry point: the city region. Despite their multiple scales and different sites of governance, these cases are united by a common theme, exemplified in each city region: addressing the contradictions of rapid development, in particular rapid growth and competitiveness. Using the conceptual framework of interpretive institutionalism, we examine how dilemmas, in this case the pressure of rapid growth in regions, are informed by the different traditions for understanding the role of the market in delivering project outcomes. Our findings show this difference in institutional norms and the variance among the different paradigms.

Keywords

Growth sustainable development interpretive institutionalism city regions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Affolderbach

Carr

(2016) Blending scales of governance: Land‐use policies and practices in the small state of Luxembourg. Regional Studies 50: 944–955.

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2011) Challenging localism. Town and Country Planning 80(7/8): 314–317.

Anderson G (1998) Smart Growth A primer. Washington: ICMA.

Architect (2011, December 18). Personal Interview.

Barker

(2004) Barker review of housing supply. HM Treasury. Available at: www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consultations_and_legislation/barker/consult_barker_index.cfm (accessed 16 March 2018).

Barnes

(1996) The Logics of Dislocation. New York: Guilford.

Barnes TJ and Sheppard E (2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34(2): 193–214.

Becker

Krueger

Hesse

(2016) Hiding the hidden hand: Essentialism, anti-essentialism, and the science-policy interface. RGS-IBG Annual Conference, Paper presented at The Royal Geographical Society, London, August.

Bevir

(1999) Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies 47(2): 345–359.

10.

Bevir

(2003) Narrating the British state: An interpretive critique of New Labour’s institutionalism. Review of International Political Economy 10(3): 455–480.

11.

Bevir

(2006) The life, death and resurrection of British governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration 1(65): 59–69.

12.

Bevir

Rhodes

(2001) A decentered approach to governance: Rational choice, institutionalism and interpretation. Working Paper 2001- 10, UC Berkeley.

13.

Bevir

Rhodes

(2006) Governance Stories. London: Routledge.

14.

Bevir

Rod

Rhodes

et al . (2003) Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration 81(1): 1–17.

15.

Carr

(2011) Luxembourg sustainable spatial development policy: General milestones and circuits (SUSTAINLUX). Available at: https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/1853/1/SUSTAINLUX_WP2.pdf (accessed 16 March 2018).

16.

Carr

(2014) Discourse yes, implementation maybe: An immobility and paralysis of sustainable development policy. European Planning Studies 22(9): 1824–1840.

17.

Carr

(forthcoming) Sustainability in small states: Luxembourg as a post-suburban space under growth pressure in need of a cross-national sustainability. In: Brinkmann

Garren

(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability: Case Studies and Practical Solutions. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 1–12.

18.

Caritas (2012, January 27). Personal Interview.

19.

Chang ICC, Leitner H and Sheppard E (2016) A green leap forward? Eco-state restructuring and the Tianjin -Binhai eco-city model. Regional Studies 50(6): 929–943.

20.

Chilla

Schulz

(2015) Spatial development in Luxembourg: Mimetic evolution or emergence of a new planning culture? European Planning Studies 23(3): 509–528.

21.

Christmann

(2017) Wohnmobilität in der Großregion eine interurbane Diskursanalyse mit Fokus auf den Städten Arlon, Thionville und Trier . PhD Dissertation, the University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

22.

CLG (2012) National Planning and Policy Framework. CLG: London.

23.

Coaffee

Healey

(2003) ‘My voice: my place’: Tracking transformations in urban governance. Urban Studies 40(10): 1979–1999.

24.

DiGaetano

Strom

(2003) Comparative urban governance: An integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review 38(3): 356–395.

25.

Durant

(2006) Agency evolution, new institutionalism, and ‘hybrid' policy domains: Lessons from the ‘greening' of the U.S. military. Policy Studies Journal 22: 469–490.

26.

Former Communities and Local Government Staff member (2009, February 3). Personal Interview.

27.

Gertler

(2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3(1): 75–99.

28.

Gibbs

Krueger

(2012) Fractures in meta‐narratives of development: An interpretive institutionalist account of land use development in the Boston city‐region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(2): 363–380.

29.

Gibson-Graham JK (1997) The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Capital & Class 21(2): 186–188.

30.

González

Healey

(2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies 42(11): 2055–2069. no.

31.

Green Party (2011, November 23) Personal. Interview.

32.

Hesse

(2014) On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(4): 612–627. doi: 10.1177/0969776414528723

33.

Hesse

(2015) Gouvernementalität – Die “Steuerung der Steuerung”. Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg 350: 23–35.

34.

Hesse

Becker

(2010) Internationalisierung und Steuerung metropolitaner Wohnungsmärkte, Das Beispiel Luxemburg. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 5/6 403–415.

35.

Horan

(2009) The politics of competitive regionalism in Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Affairs 31(3): 349–369.

36.

Housing Lawyer (2011, December 8) Personal Interview.

37.

Irazábal

(2005) Urban Governance and City Making in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland. London: Ashgate.

38.

Jonas

While

Gibbs

(2010) Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces: The new territorial politics of collective provision. Regional Studies 44(2): 183–200.

39.

Krause GA and Meier KJ (Eds.) (2005) Politics, policy, and organizations: frontiers in the scientific study of bureaucracy. University of Michigan Press.

40.

Krieger

(2014) Den domme Bierger. Luxembourger Wort. Available at: http://www.krieger-avocats.lu/blog/blog-detail.html?blogidarticle=142&blogstartmonth=2&blogmonthback=-1#.Wfc7aEyZO9Y (accessed 30 October 2017).

41.

Krueger

Gibbs

(2010) Competitive global city regions and sustainable development': An interpretive institutionalist account in the South East of England. Environment and Planning A 42: 821–837.

42.

LDA (2009, January 29) Personal Interview.

43.

Lowndes V (2005) Something old, something new, something borrowed. . .How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance. Policy Studies 26 3(4): 291–309.

44.

Lowndes

Wilson

(2001) Social capital and local governance: Exploring the institutional design variable. Political Studies 49: 629–647.

45.

Mansfield

(2004) Rules of privatization: Contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(3): 565–584.

46.

MAPC (Metropolitan Area Planning Council) (2007) Which Way to a Greater Boston Region? Boston, MA: MAPC.

47.

MAPC (Metropolitan Area Planning Council) (2008) MetroFuture Regional Plan: Goals, Objectives, and Draft Implementation Strategies. Boston, MA: MAPC.

48.

Marom

(2014) Relating a city's history and geography with Bourdieu: One hundred years of spatial distinction in Tel Aviv. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(4): 1344–1362.

49.

Mayor of London (2017) London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015-16. London: Greater London Authority.

50.

Midheme

Moulaert

(2013) Pushing back the frontiers of property: Community land trusts and low-income housing in urban Kenya. Land Use Policy 35: 73–84.

51.

Ministère de L’Intérieur (MI) (2003) Programme Directeur D’Aménagement du Territoire. Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. National Planning Policy Framework. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf (accessed 16 March 2018).

52.

Ministère du Logement (ML) (2008) Pacte Logement. Available at: www.ml.public.lu/fr/politique-logement/pacte-logement/ (accessed 16 March 2018).

53.

Ministerium für Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Infrastrukturen (MDDI) and Spangenberg JH (2011) PNDD Luxembourg: Ein Nachhaltiges Luxembourg für Mehr Lebensqualität. Available at: www.developpement-durable-infrastructures.public.lu/fr/developpement-durable-infrastructures/version_integrale/PNDD_PDF_deutsch_integral.pdf (accessed 16 March 2018).

54.

Ministry of Housing (2012, January 7) Personal Interview.

55.

Mortgage Broker (2011, December 3) Personal Interview.

56.

Murphy

(2015) Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 73–91.

57.

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2012)

58.

North

(2015) The business of the Anthropocene? Substantivist and diverse economies perspectives on SME engagement in local low carbon transitions. Progress in Human Geography 40(4): 309–325.

59.

Olds

(2001) Globalization and Urban Change. Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

60.

Peck

(2004) Geography and public policy: constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography 28(3): 392–405.

61.

Peck

(2010) Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

62.

Planning Inspectorate (2012) Available at: www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/planninginspectorate (accessed 15 July 2015).

63.

Peck J (2013) Disembedding Polanyi: exploring Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A 45(7): 1536–1544.

64.

Raco

(2005) Sustainable development, rolled-out neo-liberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode 37(2): 324–346.

65.

Rhodes

RAW

(1997) From marketisation to diplomacy: It's the mix that matters. Australian Journal of Public Administration 56(2): 40–53.

66.

Romney Advisor (2006, June 21) Personal Interview.

67.

Rosol

(2013) Vancouver’s “EcoDensity” planning initiative: A struggle over hegemony? Urban Studies 50(11): 2238–2255. DOI: 0042098013478233

68.

Thrift

Olds

(1996) Refiguring the economic in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 20(3): 311–337.

69.

While

Gibbs

Jonas

(2013) The competition state, city-regions, and the territorial politics of growth facilitation. Environment and Planning A 45: 2379–2398.

70.

Yanow D (1999) Conducting interpretive policy analysis 47. Sage Publications.

71.

Yeung

Wai-Chung (2003) Practicing new economic geographies: A methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 442–462.

72.

Zegart AB (2000) Flawed by Design: The Evolution of the CIA, JCS, and NSC. Stanford University Press.